AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast in benchmark availability between these two parts. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has two recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc G3 has no recorded benchmarks in the database. This absence of data for the Arc G3 makes a direct numerical comparison impossible, but the available scores for the AMD part provide a clear reference point.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it achieves a significantly higher score of 116,460. The average benchmark score for the V710 is 58,657, which places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database.

The Intel Arc G3 has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, though this percentile ranking is based on its position relative to other parts without any actual performance scores of its own. The lack of any benchmark entries for the G3 means the database shows zero wins for either side in head-to-head comparisons.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architectural split between these two GPUs is substantial. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, under the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake chip based on Xe3-LPG architecture, and it is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation.

Manufacturing processes differ significantly. The AMD part is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel part uses a 3 nm process at Intel, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The compute resources are heavily skewed toward the AMD card. The Radeon PRO V710 features 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also includes 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc G3 has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. These numbers indicate the AMD part has roughly 2.7 times the shading units, 5.4 times the TMUs, and 4.8 times the ROPs compared to the Intel part.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The AMD card has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Intel part has a much lower base clock of 300 MHz but a higher boost clock of 2400 MHz. The boost behavior suggests the Intel part can reach higher peak frequencies, though its base operating point is considerably lower.

Memory configurations are entirely different classes. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc G3 uses system shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent rather than fixed specifications.

The resulting throughput rates reflect the architectural gap. The AMD card delivers 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 432.0 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 27.65 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 27.65 TFLOPS (at a 1:1 ratio). The Intel part delivers 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio). The AMD card is roughly 4.5 times faster in FP32 compute and 4 times faster in pixel throughput.

Power characteristics differ just as dramatically. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and requires a suggested power supply of 450 W. It is a single-slot card. The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W, uses no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics processor with no suggested PSU requirement.

API support is identical for both parts. Each supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release dates are far apart. The AMD card was released on October 2, 2024. The Intel part has a release date of May 31, 2026, and its production status is marked as active.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every measured performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is 4.5 times higher than the Intel Arc G3's 6.144 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s gives the AMD card a 4 to 1 advantage in rasterization throughput. Texture rate follows the same pattern, with 432.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem is a decisive advantage for the AMD part. The 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth is a discrete GPU configuration. The Intel part relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, which means its performance scales with whatever platform it is integrated into.

The Intel Arc G3 wins in power efficiency on paper. Its 25 W TDP is substantially lower than the 158 W TDP of the AMD card. The Intel part requires no power connectors and operates as an integrated processor, while the AMD card needs a discrete power connection and a 450 W power supply recommendation.

The boost clock also favors the Intel part. Its 2400 MHz boost clock exceeds the AMD card's 2000 MHz boost clock. However, the base clock of 300 MHz for the Intel part is far below the AMD card's 1900 MHz base clock, indicating a much wider dynamic range for the integrated part.

The AMD card has a documented benchmark presence with an average score of 58,657 and a percentile ranking of 88. The Intel card has no benchmark scores recorded, making its actual performance unverified in the database.

For use cases, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is positioned for workloads that demand high compute throughput, substantial memory capacity, and dedicated graphics processing. The Intel Arc G3 is positioned for portable devices where power consumption is critical, as indicated by its 25 W TDP and portable device dependent display outputs.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is 4.5 times higher than the Intel Arc G3's 6.144 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc G3 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W and requires a 450 W power supply. The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors.

Q: Are the API feature sets different?

A: No, both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the release dates for these GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 was released on October 2, 2024. The Intel Arc G3 has a release date of May 31, 2026.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 54 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc G3 has 10 ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the clear performance leader in every measurable category. Its FP32 compute of 27.65 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s all dwarf the Intel Arc G3's corresponding figures of 6.144 TFLOPS, 48.00 GPixel/s, and 96.00 GTexel/s. The AMD card's 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a level of memory performance that the Intel part's system shared memory cannot match.

The Intel Arc G3's advantages are limited to power consumption and integration. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD card's 158 W TDP, and its integrated nature with no power connectors makes it suitable for portable devices where power draw is the primary constraint. The 2400 MHz boost clock is also higher than the AMD part's 2000 MHz boost clock, though the Intel part's 300 MHz base clock indicates a much lower sustained operating point.

The database shows the AMD card has verified performance with an average benchmark score of 58,657 and an 88th percentile ranking. The Intel card has no recorded benchmarks, so its actual performance remains unproven in the database.

Users who need dedicated graphics performance with substantial memory capacity and high compute throughput should select the AMD Radeon PRO V710. Users who prioritize minimal power consumption and integrated graphics in a portable device should consider the Intel Arc G3, provided its unverified performance meets their requirements. The data supports the AMD card for any workload where raw graphics throughput matters, while the Intel part only makes sense where power envelope is the decisive factor.