AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc B770 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the Intel Arc B770. The Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark entries in our database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO V710, by contrast, has two recorded benchmark results: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Because the Intel Arc B770 lacks any measured scores, the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the AMD card's nearest rival data. The Radeon PRO V710 sits 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100 (average score 58,528), 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58,392), 0.7% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M (average score 58,239), and 1.0% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (average score 58,085). These deltas are narrow, indicating the V710 clusters tightly with mid-range cards from the prior generation rather than pulling decisively ahead of any single competitor.

The absence of any Arc B770 benchmark data means no direct wins can be assigned to either card. The database records zero wins for each product in head-to-head testing. The only measurable conclusion from the benchmark section is that the Radeon PRO V710 holds a clear performance advantage over the Arc B770 in terms of recorded evidence, since the latter has no recorded performance whatsoever. The 88th percentile ranking for the AMD card versus the 50th percentile for the Intel card further underscores that gap, though the Intel figure reflects a lack of data rather than a measured performance level.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better recorded benchmark performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has recorded results in two tests, with an average benchmark score of 58,657 and an 88th percentile ranking. The Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, meaning no performance data exists for it in the database.

Q: How much faster is the Radeon PRO V710 compared to its closest rivals?

A: The V710 leads the NVIDIA P102-100 by 0.2%, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 0.5%, the Intel Arc A570M by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 1.0% in average benchmark score.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B770 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the clock speeds for the two GPUs?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Arc B770 has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The Arc B770 delivers 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 but 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). In FP32 the AMD card is ahead, while in FP16 the Intel card leads.

Q: What display outputs does each card provide?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs. The Intel Arc B770 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations with distinct design priorities. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture under the codename Wheat Nas, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Arc 7) generation. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but their transistor counts diverge sharply. The AMD chip integrates 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The Intel chip's transistor count is unknown, but its die size is larger at 368 mm².

The compute unit layouts differ in every category. The Radeon PRO V710 contains 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation pipelines, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Arc B770 contains 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. Despite having fewer shading units and TMUs, the AMD card achieves higher FP32 throughput at 27.65 TFLOPS versus 19.66 TFLOPS for Intel, indicating different per-unit efficiency characteristics. The FP16 situation reverses: the Radeon delivers 27.65 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc B770 delivers 39.32 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning Intel's hardware processes two FP16 operations per FP32 operation.

Rasterization and texture rates follow the raw unit counts. The Arc B770 produces 307.2 GPixel/s pixel fill rate and 614.4 GTexel/s texture fill rate, both higher than the Radeon's 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility does not differentiate them.

The memory architecture also differs fundamentally. The Radeon PRO V710 pairs 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus for 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc B770 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a wider 256-bit bus for slightly higher bandwidth at 512.0 GB/s. The AMD card's larger capacity targets memory-intensive workloads, while Intel's narrower-but-wider bus configuration prioritizes raw bandwidth per gigabyte.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. The Radeon PRO V710 measures 346 mm² die size versus 368 mm² for the Arc B770, with the AMD card having 28,100 million transistors while Intel's count remains unknown. Process nodes match at 5 nm from TSMC, but the Radeon's density is listed at 81.2M per mm² with no density figure for Intel.

Clock speeds favor Intel: 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost versus 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost for AMD. Memory clocks go the other way, with AMD at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and Intel at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Total memory capacity strongly favors AMD at 28 GB versus 16 GB, while bus width favors Intel at 256-bit versus 224-bit. Bandwidth is nearly identical at 504.0 GB/s for AMD and 512.0 GB/s for Intel.

Compute resources split between the two. Intel has more shading units (4,096 vs 3,456), more TMUs (256 vs 216), more ROPs (128 vs 96), but fewer ray tracing cores (32 vs 54). FP32 output favors AMD at 27.65 TFLOPS versus 19.66 TFLOPS, while FP16 output favors Intel at 39.32 TFLOPS versus 27.65 TFLOPS. Pixel rate and texture rate both favor Intel at 307.2 GPixel/s and 614.4 GTexel/s against AMD's 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, is single-slot, uses one 8-pin power connector, and requires a 450 W suggested PSU. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W, is dual-slot, uses one 6-pin plus one 8-pin connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The AMD card has no display outputs, while the Intel card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Both use PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces. Release dates differ, with the Radeon PRO V710 dated 2024-10-02 and the Arc B770 dated 2025-12-31. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel card's predecessor is Alchemist.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in scenarios where measured performance matters. Its recorded average benchmark score of 58,657 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460. Its 28 GB memory capacity is double the Intel card's 16 GB, which suits workloads that require large datasets resident in VRAM. The 54 ray tracing cores exceed Intel's 32, and the 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 output outpaces the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. At 158 W TDP with a single-slot design and one 8-pin connector, it also demands less power and board space.

The Intel Arc B770 wins in raw throughput categories that favor its wider execution resources. Its 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs all exceed AMD's counts. The 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 614.4 GTexel/s texture rate are substantially higher than the Radeon's 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s. The FP16 output of 39.32 TFLOPS is 11.67 TFLOPS higher than AMD's 27.65 TFLOPS, making it stronger for workloads that leverage packed math. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth edges out AMD's 504.0 GB/s, and the 256-bit bus provides a wider path for memory transactions. Display connectivity is exclusive to the Intel card, which offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, whereas the AMD card has no outputs at all.

The power envelope favors AMD, but the performance-per-watt story is not directly computable from the recorded data since neither card has a measured score for the Arc B770. The Arc B770's higher TDP of 225 W and dual-slot cooling requirement suggest it targets performance-oriented installs, while the Radeon PRO V710's 158 W TDP and single-slot form factor suit dense or power-constrained environments.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split between the two cards based on available evidence. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only one with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 58,657. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.0% of its score, meaning it delivers competitive mid-range performance with a slight edge over the NVIDIA P102-100, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM. For buyers who need a working GPU with verified performance, the Radeon PRO V710 is the only choice supported by measurements.

The Intel Arc B770 presents a different profile. With no benchmark scores, no average score, and no rival comparisons, its performance cannot be validated from the database. Its specification sheet shows higher clock speeds, more shading units, more texture units, more ROPs, faster pixel and texture rates, higher FP16 throughput, and more display outputs. Those specifications indicate a card built for rasterization-heavy and FP16-packed workloads, but without recorded data, any performance claim remains unverified.

The memory comparison favors AMD for capacity and Intel for bandwidth. The Radeon's 28 GB versus the Arc's 16 GB is a 12 GB difference, which matters for large models or high-resolution texture sets. The Arc's 512.0 GB/s versus the Radeon's 504.0 GB/s is a narrow 8 GB/s margin, unlikely to be decisive in practice. The 256-bit bus on Intel versus 224-bit on AMD does not translate into a meaningful bandwidth advantage.

The Radeon PRO V710 also holds the edge in power efficiency, with a 158 W TDP versus 225 W, a single-slot cooler versus dual-slot, and a single 8-pin connector versus 6-pin plus 8-pin. The suggested PSU of 450 W for AMD versus 550 W for Intel reinforces the lower system-level requirements for the Radeon card.

For compute workloads requiring FP32 precision, the Radeon's 27.65 TFLOPS exceeds the Arc's 19.66 TFLOPS by a wide margin. For FP16 throughput, the Arc's 39.32 TFLOPS doubles AMD's 27.65 TFLOPS with its 2:1 ratio, making it the stronger option for AI inference or other packed-math operations. Ray tracing core counts favor AMD at 54 versus 32, though no benchmark data confirms a practical advantage.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the validated performer with measured scores, a high percentile ranking, and a narrow but consistent lead over its nearest rivals. The Intel Arc B770 remains an unmeasured specification sheet with promising raw numbers but zero evidence of actual performance. Anyone requiring confirmed benchmark results should select the Radeon PRO V710. Anyone prioritizing the theoretical capabilities of more shading units, higher clocks, faster fill rates, and FP16 throughput, and who can tolerate a higher power draw and no measured performance, may consider the Arc B770, but the database provides no support for that choice.