AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc B390 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison recorded in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and the result is decisive. The Intel Arc B390 scores 1482 points, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853 points. This represents a delta of -42.4% for the AMD part, meaning the Intel Arc B390 is approximately 73.8% faster in this specific workload. The Intel Arc B390 wins the sole head-to-head benchmark, giving it a 1-0 win record over the AMD Radeon PRO V710.

The average benchmark score tells a different story when broader data is considered. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1,482, placing it in the 9th percentile. This stark contrast indicates that the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is positioned far higher in the overall performance hierarchy, despite losing the single Steel Nomad test.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 in the database include the NVIDIA P102-100 with an average score of 58,528 (0.2% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT with 58,392 (0.5% slower), the Intel Arc A570M with 58,239 (0.7% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM with 58,085 (1.0% slower). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, showing that the AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits in a tightly contested performance band.

For the Intel Arc B390, the nearest rivals are dramatically lower in the performance spectrum. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX has an average score of 1,463 (1.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1,460 (1.5% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1,446 (2.5% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1,443 (2.7% slower). The Intel Arc B390 leads these rivals by small margins, confirming its position at the low end of the database's performance rankings.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The chip is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc B390 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The chip is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. The transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown in the database, and no transistor density figure is available.

Clock behavior differs substantially between the two. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel Arc B390 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, but its memory clock is listed as "System Shared," meaning it relies on system memory rather than dedicated VRAM.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a discrete add-in board with a single-slot form factor, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested power supply. It has a TDP of 158 W. The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with an 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU rating. Its display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs at all, indicating its intended use as a compute or rendering accelerator rather than a display adapter.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B390 wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with a score of 1482 versus 853 for the AMD Radeon PRO V710. This indicates that in this particular DX12 workload, the Intel part delivers superior performance despite its lower overall standing in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins on raw computational throughput based on the recorded specifications. It delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 7.680 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc B390. The AMD part also offers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel Arc B390 provides 15.36 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines, compared to 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs for the Intel Arc B390.

Memory capacity is another area where the AMD Radeon PRO V710 dominates. It has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc B390 uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, which places it at a significant disadvantage for memory-intensive workloads.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 also leads in pixel and texture throughput. It achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s, compared to 60.00 GPixel/s and 120.0 GTexel/s for the Intel Arc B390. The AMD part has 54 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc B390 has 12.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU won the head-to-head benchmark between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the Intel Arc B390?

A: The Intel Arc B390 won the only head-to-head benchmark, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, scoring 1482 against the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 853, a delta of -42.4% for the AMD part.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1,482, placing it in the 9th percentile.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS.

Q: What type of memory does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B390 uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc B390 uses a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the TDP for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W. The Intel Arc B390 has a TDP of 80 W.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Intel Arc B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture. The AMD part is built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The Intel part uses a 3 nm Intel process with unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock speeds differ, with the AMD Radeon PRO V710 running at 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, while the Intel Arc B390 runs at 300 MHz base and 2500 MHz boost. Memory configurations are entirely different: the AMD part has 28 GB GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part uses system shared memory.

Compute resources differ significantly. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc B390 has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. Pixel rates are 192.0 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 432.0 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS for the AMD part versus 7.680 TFLOPS for the Intel part. FP16 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) for the AMD part versus 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Intel part. TDP is 158 W for the AMD part versus 80 W for the Intel part. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot card with one 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, while the Intel Arc B390 is an IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs, while the Intel Arc B390 has portable device dependent outputs. The AMD part uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface. Release dates differ, with the AMD part launched on 2024-10-02 and the Intel part on 2026-01-26. The AMD part's production status is not recorded, while the Intel part is listed as active.

The Verdict

The data presents a split picture. In the single head-to-head benchmark available, the Intel Arc B390 is the clear winner, outperforming the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 42.4% in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. However, the overall benchmark averages indicate that the AMD Radeon PRO V710 operates in a completely different performance class, with an average score of 58,657 compared to 1,482 for the Intel part.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 belongs in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, competing with the NVIDIA P102-100, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, all within 1% of its average score. The Intel Arc B390 sits in the 9th percentile, competing with legacy NVIDIA parts like the GeForce GT 520MX and GeForce GT 710.

The architecture differences reinforce this divide. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a discrete workstation accelerator with 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated GPU with system shared memory and 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The AMD part targets compute-heavy workloads that benefit from high memory capacity and bandwidth, while the Intel part is designed for portable devices where power efficiency (80 W TDP) and integration matter.

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Arc B390 wins the specific DX12 workload tested, but the broader database positions the AMD Radeon PRO V710 as the higher-performing GPU by a wide margin. The choice between them depends on the workload: the Intel Arc B390 shows an advantage in the recorded Steel Nomad DX12 test, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 offers substantially higher theoretical throughput, more memory, and a higher overall benchmark standing.