AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc A380E x2 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the Intel Arc A380E x2. The recorded measurements include only two benchmark entries for the AMD part, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores at all.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 58,657, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc A380E x2 holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating that no completed benchmark runs are present in the dataset for this configuration.

The nearest rivals for the AMD card provide context for its positioning. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, which is 0.2% behind the AMD part. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58,392, a 0.5% deficit. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58,239, trailing by 0.7%. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58,085, sitting 1.0% behind. These margins are narrow, all within a single percentage point, indicating that the PRO V710 clusters tightly with a group of mid-to-high-range cards in aggregate performance.

The absence of head-to-head results means the comparison rests on architectural and specification differences rather than direct measurements. The Intel card's lack of benchmark data prevents any quantitative performance delta from being established between the two products.

FAQ

Q: Does the database include any direct benchmark comparison between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the Intel Arc A380E x2?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the Intel Arc A380E x2 has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has two recorded benchmark entries: 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 rank relative to other GPUs in the database?

A: The AMD card sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 58,657. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, averages 58,528, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT trails by 0.5%, the Intel Arc A570M by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 1.0%.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc A380E x2 uses 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W and requires a 450 W suggested power supply with a single 8-pin power connector. The Intel Arc A380E x2 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a 300 W suggested power supply with a single 6-pin power connector.

Q: Which display outputs does each card provide?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs. The Intel Arc A380E x2 provides 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no production status listed in the database. The Intel Arc A380E x2 is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor listed as Xe Graphics and its successor as Battlemage.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture under the codename Wheat Nas, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc A380E x2 uses the DG2-128 chip with Xe-HPG architecture under the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation.

The process nodes differ substantially. AMD fabricates the Navi 32 on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while Intel fabricates the DG2-128 on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor counts reflect this difference: the AMD chip packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The Intel chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a density of 45.9M per mm².

The compute pipelines diverge sharply. The AMD card carries 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel card carries 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. Neither card lists tensor cores in the database.

Memory architecture also differs. The AMD card uses a 224-bit bus with 28 GB of GDDR6 running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card uses a 96-bit bus with 6 GB of GDDR6 running at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The FP16 compute ratio differs between the two architectures. The AMD card achieves 27.65 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, a 1:1 ratio. The Intel card achieves 4.096 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS for FP16, a 2:1 ratio where FP16 throughput doubles FP32 throughput.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Intel card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Intel Arc A380E x2 has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, meaning its base clock matches its boost clock.

The memory subsystems are far apart. The AMD card offers 28 GB, the Intel card 6 GB. The AMD bus width is 224 bit versus 96 bit. The AMD bandwidth is 504.0 GB/s versus 186.0 GB/s. The AMD memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, the Intel memory clock is 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective.

The render output capabilities scale with the core counts. The AMD card delivers 192.0 GPixel/s of pixel rate and 432.0 GTexel/s of texture rate. The Intel card delivers 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications differ. The AMD card consumes 158 W with a 450 W suggested power supply and a single 8-pin connector. The Intel card consumes 130 W with a 300 W suggested power supply and a single 6-pin connector. Both are single-slot cards.

The display output situation is fundamentally different. The AMD card has no display outputs at all, while the Intel card provides 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connectors. The Intel card has recorded physical dimensions of 265 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, while the AMD card has no dimensions listed.

The Intel card is marked end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, while the AMD card has no production status or successor listed. The AMD card's predecessor is listed as Radeon Pro Vega; the Intel card's predecessor is Xe Graphics.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins decisively on raw compute resources. Its 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs dwarf the Intel card's 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Its FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is roughly 6.75 times the Intel card's 4.096 TFLOPS, based on the recorded figures. Its 54 ray tracing cores compare to 8 on the Intel part. The 28 GB memory capacity, 224-bit bus, and 504.0 GB/s bandwidth position the AMD card for workloads that need large working sets and high memory throughput. The 1:1 FP16 ratio means FP16 workloads do not gain a throughput advantage over FP32 on the AMD card, which may matter for mixed-precision workflows.

The Intel Arc A380E x2 wins on integration and physical flexibility. Its 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs make it suitable for display-intensive configurations, which the AMD card cannot serve because it has no outputs. Its smaller die size of 157 mm² and lower transistor count of 7,200 million indicate a smaller physical footprint, and its 130 W TDP with a 300 W suggested PSU lowers the system power envelope compared to the AMD card's 158 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU. The Intel card's 2:1 FP16 ratio provides doubled throughput for FP16 workloads relative to its own FP32 rate, which could benefit compute tasks that operate in half precision. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface uses fewer lanes than the AMD card's x16 interface, which may simplify platform integration in some systems.

The AMD card's 88th percentile ranking versus the Intel card's 50th percentile, combined with the Intel card's lack of recorded benchmark scores, indicates that the database contains no evidence of the Intel card outperforming the AMD card in any measured test. The AMD card's nearest rivals all sit within 1.0% of its average score, while the Intel card has no rivals listed because it has no benchmark data.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split in intended use. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the compute-oriented part. Its 28 GB memory, 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and 88th percentile ranking place it in a performance tier that the Intel Arc A380E x2 cannot approach based on the recorded specifications. The lack of display outputs confirms that this card is meant for rendering, simulation, or other GPU compute workloads where video output is not required.

The Intel Arc A380E x2 is the display-centric part. Its 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs provide multi-display capability that the AMD card simply does not offer. Its lower power draw of 130 W, smaller die, and x8 PCIe interface make it a lighter integration burden. The 2:1 FP16 ratio provides half-precision throughput that exceeds its own FP32 rate, which may benefit certain compute tasks, though its absolute FP16 throughput of 8.192 TFLOPS remains far below the AMD card's 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 figure.

The production statuses reinforce the positioning. The Intel card is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage, while the AMD card shows no production status and no successor. The AMD card released on 2024-10-02, after the Intel card's 2024-03-31 release. Neither card has a launch MSRP recorded in the database, so no pricing comparison is possible from the available data.

For workloads that demand maximum compute throughput per the recorded numbers, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only choice between these two. For workloads that require driving multiple displays from a single card with modest power requirements, the Intel Arc A380E x2 has a functional advantage that no amount of compute performance can replace. The database provides no benchmark evidence that the Intel card competes with the AMD card on raw performance, and its 50th percentile ranking with zero recorded scores confirms that its role is different. Choose based on the job: compute goes to AMD, display output goes to Intel.