AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 records an average benchmark score of 58,657, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE records 42,723. The V710 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile.

Q: How do the two cards compare in DirectX 12 gaming workloads?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 2,336, which is 63.5% higher than the PRO V710's score of 853. This is a decisive win for the RX 7650 GRE in this particular workload.

Q: Which card wins in OpenCL compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 40.1% ahead of the RX 7650 GRE's 83,109. The data indicates the V710 holds a substantial lead in this compute-oriented benchmark.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 features 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Are both cards based on the same architecture?

A: Yes, both cards use RDNA 3.0 architecture, but they are built on different process nodes and chips. The PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip on a 5 nm process, while the RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm process.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each card in the database?

A: The PRO V710's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 (0.2% difference), AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.5%), and Intel Arc A570M (0.7%). The RX 7650 GRE's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (1.2% lower), NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (1.2% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (1.3% lower).

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 establishes its dominance in compute-heavy workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL result of 116,460 against 83,109 for the RX 7650 GRE represents a 40.1% advantage. This aligns with the card's professional positioning. Its nearest rivals in the database, such as the NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, sit within 0.5% of its average score, meaning the V710 competes in a performance tier populated by capable workstation and high-end gaming parts. The 28 GB memory capacity and 504.0 GB/s bandwidth give it a clear edge in memory-intensive professional applications, even if the database does not directly measure those workloads.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins decisively in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, scoring 2,336 versus 853 for the V710, a 63.5% margin. This is a gaming-oriented workload, and the RX 7650 GRE's higher boost clock of 2695 MHz compared to 2000 MHz on the V710 contributes to its strong showing. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, which scores only 1.2% higher on average, placing the RX 7650 GRE in a competitive gaming segment. The card also carries display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1), whereas the V710 has no display outputs, making the RX 7650 GRE the only option of the two for direct display connection.

The split is clean: the V710 takes compute and memory capacity, the RX 7650 GRE takes gaming performance and connectivity. Users who need raw OpenCL throughput and massive memory will favor the V710, while those seeking DX12 gaming performance and display connectivity will favor the RX 7650 GRE.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs share the RDNA 3.0 architecture, but they diverge significantly in implementation. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with the codename Wheat Nas, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is notable: 5 nm versus 6 nm gives the V710 a density advantage, as reflected in its 81.2M transistors per mm² versus 65.2M for the RX 7650 GRE.

The transistor counts differ substantially. The V710 packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the RX 7650 GRE contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The V710's die is larger and denser, which supports its higher shading unit count of 3,456 versus 2,048, its 216 texture mapping units versus 128, and its 96 raster operations pipelines versus 64. Ray tracing cores also differ: the V710 has 54, while the RX 7650 GRE has 32.

Clock behavior reveals a different design philosophy. The V710 runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, which is conservative. The RX 7650 GRE runs at a base clock of 1720 MHz but boosts to 2695 MHz, with a game clock of 2350 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE clearly prioritizes higher clock speeds, while the V710 relies on a wider configuration of compute units running at lower frequencies.

Memory architecture differs as well. The V710 uses a 224-bit bus with 28 GB of GDDR6, while the RX 7650 GRE uses a 128-bit bus with 8 GB. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, but the wider bus on the V710 yields 504.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s on the RX 7650 GRE.

The PCIe interface also differs: the V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the V710 has double the PCIe lanes available, which can matter for data transfer in professional workloads.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification category. The V710 has a 5 nm process node versus 6 nm for the RX 7650 GRE. Transistor count: 28,100 million versus 13,300 million. Die size: 346 mm² versus 204 mm². Transistor density: 81.2M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm².

Clock speeds: the V710's base clock is 1900 MHz versus 1720 MHz, but the RX 7650 GRE's boost clock is 2695 MHz versus 2000 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE also lists a game clock of 2350 MHz, while the V710 does not report one. Memory clock is identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory: 28 GB versus 8 GB, 224-bit versus 128-bit bus, 504.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: the V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores. The RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. Neither card has tensor cores.

Rates: the V710 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 432.0 GTexel/s texture rate, while the RX 7650 GRE achieves 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance: 27.65 TFLOPS for the V710 versus 22.08 TFLOPS for the RX 7650 GRE, both at a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical design: the V710 has a TDP of 158 W and is single-slot, while the RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and is dual-slot. Both use a single 8-pin power connector and recommend a 450 W PSU. The V710 has no display outputs; the RX 7650 GRE has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The RX 7650 GRE measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height; the V710's dimensions are not recorded. The RX 7650 GRE's production status is Active, and its predecessor is Navi II with successor Navi IV. The V710's predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega, and its successor is not recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two recorded head-to-head benchmarks tell a story of specialization. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins with a score of 2,336. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853, which means the RX 7650 GRE outperforms it by 63.5%. This is the largest single-benchmark gap between the two cards in either direction. The RX 7650 GRE's higher boost clock of 2695 MHz likely drives much of this advantage, as the DX12 workload benefits from higher frequency execution.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins with a score of 116,460. The RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109, giving the V710 a 40.1% advantage. This benchmark rewards the V710's wider compute configuration: 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 54 RT cores, combined with 28 GB of memory and 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS further supports this result.

The delta percentages are asymmetric. The RX 7650 GRE's 63.5% lead in DX12 is larger than the V710's 40.1% lead in OpenCL. However, the OpenCL test is the more compute-intensive workload, and the V710's win there is substantial in absolute terms: a difference of 33,351 points. The DX12 win for the RX 7650 GRE is also large in absolute terms: a difference of 1,483 points.

The database also places each card in a competitive context. The V710's nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, scores 58,528, a mere 0.2% below the V710's 58,657 average. The RX 7650 GRE's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, scores 43,223, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 7650 GRE's 42,723. This means the V710 is essentially tied with its closest competitor, while the RX 7650 GRE trails its closest competitor by a small margin.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct use cases rather than a single winner. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the choice for compute-oriented workloads. Its 40.1% OpenCL advantage, 28 GB of memory, 504.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it the stronger card for professional compute tasks. Its 88th percentile ranking and average score of 58,657 place it ahead of the RX 7650 GRE's 83rd percentile and 42,723 average score. The V710 also has a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and a single-slot form factor, which suits dense workstation builds. Its lack of display outputs is not a drawback in a compute server context, where cards are expected to run headless.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the choice for gaming and direct display workloads. Its 63.5% DX12 advantage in 3DMark Steel Nomad demonstrates clear gaming superiority. It is the only one of the two with display outputs, and its dual-slot design with a 204 mm length fits standard consumer cases. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, and its 83rd percentile ranking shows it is a competitive gaming card. The RX 7650 GRE also has a lower average score of 42,723, but in gaming workloads the data shows it is the better performer.

Users who need compute throughput, large memory capacity, and high bandwidth should select the PRO V710. Users who need gaming performance, display connectivity, and higher clock speeds should select the RX 7650 GRE. The two cards do not overlap in their strengths, and the benchmark data supports a clear division of roles.