AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600M and AMD Radeon PRO V710 are both RDNA 3.0 parts, but they target completely different workloads and performance tiers. The data shows a decisive split: the PRO V710 wins the only shared benchmark by a massive 45.2% margin, while the RX 7600M is a low-power mobile chip. The PRO V710 is the clear performance leader, but the RX 7600M’s entire design philosophy is about efficiency and mobility, not raw throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results are unambiguous: the AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins the head-to-head Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 116,460 against the RX 7600M’s 63,775, a delta of -45.2% for the mobile part. This is a dominant victory for the V710, placing it in a different performance class altogether. The V710’s average benchmark score of 58,657, however, is slightly lower than the RX 7600M’s 63,775, which reflects the fact that the V710’s single OpenCL run is its only strong showing, while its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 drags its average down.

For the RX 7600M, its win condition is not about beating the V710 in compute; it is about existing in a power envelope that the V710 cannot touch. The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a portable-device-dependent display output, making it suited for thin laptops where discrete power connectors are absent. The V710, in contrast, is a 158 W single-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and no display outputs, designed for server racks or workstation builds where headless compute is the priority. The RX 7600M wins on portability and integration; the V710 wins on every measurable performance metric.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share the RDNA 3.0 architecture but diverge sharply in implementation. The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M / mm². The V710 uses the larger Navi 32 chip on a more advanced 5 nm TSMC process, packing 28,100 million transistors into 346 mm², for a density of 81.2M / mm². The V710’s die is 69.6% larger in area and carries more than double the transistor count, which directly explains its higher compute capacity.

The compute resources tell the same story. The V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores, versus the RX 7600M’s 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 RT cores. That is exactly double the shaders and TMUs, and nearly double the RT cores. The V710 also boosts to 2000 MHz from a 1900 MHz base, while the RX 7600M boosts to 2410 MHz from a 1500 MHz base. The RX 7600M’s higher boost clock partially compensates for its smaller core count, but not enough: its FP32 throughput is 17.27 TFLOPS versus the V710’s 27.65 TFLOPS. The V710 also doubles the FP16 rate at 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) compared to the RX 7600M’s 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) — note the V710’s 1:1 FP16 rate means it does not rely on packed math, while the RX 7600M’s 2:1 rate is a peak figure.

Memory is another huge differentiator. The V710 ships with 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, for 256.0 GB/s. The V710’s memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus the RX 7600M’s 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This 3.5x capacity and 1.97x bandwidth advantage makes the V710 far more suitable for large datasets, AI inference, or high-resolution rendering. The V710 also has a higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s vs 154.2 GPixel/s) and texture rate (432.0 GTexel/s vs 269.9 GTexel/s).

The Verdict

Based strictly on the data, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the superior GPU for any workload that stresses compute, memory capacity, or bandwidth. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 82.6% higher than the RX 7600M, and it offers 3.5x the VRAM. The V710 is a professional-grade card for headless servers or workstations, evidenced by its no-display-output design and 158 W TDP. If you need to run large models, render complex scenes, or process massive datasets, the V710 is the only choice.

The RX 7600M, on the other hand, is the correct pick for a mobile system. Its 90 W TDP and IGP form factor mean it can be integrated into a laptop without a discrete power connector, and its portable-device-dependent display outputs are designed for built-in screens. It loses every benchmark comparison to the V710, but it is not competing in the same arena. The RX 7600M’s percentile rank is 89 versus the V710’s 88, which is a statistical tie, but this is driven by the V710’s low 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853, which may reflect a driver or workload mismatch rather than true capability. For a gamer or mobile user, the RX 7600M offers a 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance in a package that fits in a laptop. For a professional compute workload, the V710’s 27.65 TFLOPS and 28 GB VRAM are in a different league.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710, with 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 versus the RX 7600M’s 17.27 TFLOPS. The V710 also leads in Geekbench OpenCL with 116,460 vs 63,775.

Q: How much memory do these cards have?

A: The PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are these cards suitable for gaming?

A: The RX 7600M is a mobile part with an IGP form factor and portable-device-dependent outputs, suggesting laptop gaming. The PRO V710 has no display outputs, so it is not for direct gaming use; its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 853.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP and no power connectors. The PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP, a 1x 8-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The PRO V710 has 54 RT cores, while the RX 7600M has 28 RT cores.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The RX 7600M uses a 6 nm TSMC process, while the PRO V710 uses a 5 nm TSMC process. The V710’s die is 346 mm² versus the RX 7600M’s 204 mm².

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is Geekbench OpenCL, and it is a rout. The PRO V710 scores 116,460, while the RX 7600M scores 63,775. This is a 45.2% gap in favor of the V710, meaning the V710 delivers nearly twice the OpenCL compute performance. This result aligns with the architectural differences: the V710 has 3,456 shading units versus 1,792, and 54 RT cores versus 28. The V710’s 5 nm process also allows for a higher transistor density (81.2M / mm² vs 65.2M / mm²), which contributes to its efficiency in raw throughput.

The RX 7600M’s higher boost clock of 2410 MHz versus the V710’s 2000 MHz does not close the gap. Even with a 20.5% clock advantage, the V710’s double shader count wins out. In terms of memory, the V710’s 504.0 GB/s bandwidth is nearly double the RX 7600M’s 256.0 GB/s, which is critical for OpenCL workloads that are often memory-bound. The V710’s 28 GB capacity also eliminates any VRAM ceiling that the RX 7600M’s 8 GB might hit.

There is no benchmark where the RX 7600M wins. The winsA field is 0, and winsB is 1. The PRO V710’s average benchmark score of 58,657 is lower than the RX 7600M’s 63,775, but this is misleading because the V710’s average includes the 853 score from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a low result for a card of this class. The Geekbench OpenCL score is the more representative metric for compute, and there the V710 is clearly superior.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600M | AMD Radeon PRO V710 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | Navi 32 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 28,100 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 346 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 81.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 1900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2410 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2070 MHz | N/A |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 28 GB |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 224 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 504.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 3456 |

| TMUs | 112 | 216 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 54 |

| Pixel Rate | 154.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 269.9 GTexel/s | 432.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.27 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 90 W | 158 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | N/A | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-10-02 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega |