AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Comparison

# AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB occupy different corners of the Radeon lineup, despite sharing the AMD brand and similar API support. The PRO V710 is a workstation-oriented card built on RDNA 3.0 with a massive 28 GB frame buffer, while the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a consumer gaming card from the RDNA 2.0 generation. Benchmark data shows the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB winning the only direct head-to-head test, yet the PRO V710 holds a higher average benchmark score and percentile ranking, creating an interesting split between synthetic DX12 performance and overall compute averages.

Where Each One Wins

The data paints a clear division of labor. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB wins the only shared benchmark in the head-to-head comparison: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 2402 against the PRO V710’s 853, a delta of -64.5% in favor of the RX 6750 GRE. This is a massive margin, indicating the consumer card is far stronger in this particular DirectX 12 workload, likely tied to its higher boost clock and gaming-oriented design.

However, the PRO V710 wins on overall compute muscle. Its average benchmark score of 58657 surpasses the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB’s 55698, and its percentile ranking of 88 beats the RX 6750 GRE’s 87. In Geekbench OpenCL, the PRO V710 posts 116460, though the RX 6750 GRE has no comparable OpenCL result in the pack—only a Geekbench Vulkan score of 108994. The PRO V710’s FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is more than double the RX 6750 GRE’s 13.21 TFLOPS, suggesting compute-heavy tasks like rendering or simulation would favor the workstation card. The RX 6750 GRE counters with a higher FP16 rate of 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1), nearly matching the PRO V710’s 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1), though the PRO V710 achieves this without the 2:1 shader packing trick.

The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB also wins on clock speeds and power efficiency per clock, but the PRO V710’s architectural advantages in raw throughput and memory capacity make it the choice for workloads that scale with compute units and VRAM. The RX 6750 GRE is the pick for gaming and DX12-centric tasks; the PRO V710 is the pick for compute density.

Architecture Differences

The two cards represent two distinct generations of RDNA. The PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Wheat Nas," while the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB uses the Navi 22 chip on RDNA 2.0. This generational gap shows up in the process node: the PRO V710 is fabbed on TSMC’s 5 nm process, versus the RX 6750 GRE’s 7 nm process. Transistor counts reflect this: the PRO V710 packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a density of 81.2 million transistors per mm². The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, at 51.3 million per mm². The PRO V710’s die is only 11 mm² larger but holds nearly 11 billion more transistors.

The PRO V710’s compute configuration is substantially larger: 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster output pipelines, and 54 ray tracing cores. The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. This translates into higher pixel and texture rates for the PRO V710: 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s versus the RX 6750 GRE’s 165.2 GPixel/s and 413.0 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 12 GB on a 192-bit bus, at 432.0 GB/s. Both run the same memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The PRO V710’s 16 GB extra capacity is the headline feature, more than doubling the consumer card’s VRAM.

Power and physical design differ too: the PRO V710 is a single-slot card with a 158 W TDP and a single 8-pin connector, suggesting a 450 W PSU. The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is dual-slot, 250 W TDP, with a 6-pin plus 8-pin connector and a 600 W PSU recommendation. The RX 6750 GRE also has display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a), while the PRO V710 has no outputs—it is compute-only.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single head-to-head benchmark is decisive. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 2402, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853. The delta is -64.5% relative to the RX 6750 GRE, meaning the PRO V710 trails by nearly two-thirds. This is a massive gap for a single test, but it fits the cards’ positioning. Steel Nomad is a DirectX 12 gaming-centric workload, and the RX 6750 GRE is built for that: its boost clock of 2581 MHz versus the PRO V710’s 2000 MHz gives it a 29% clock advantage, and its game clock of 2439 MHz is still well above the PRO V710’s base clock of 1900 MHz.

Yet the PRO V710’s average benchmark score of 58657 versus the RX 6750 GRE’s 55698 shows the workstation card wins in aggregate compute. The PRO V710’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 116460 is its strongest result, and while the RX 6750 GRE lacks an OpenCL score, its Geekbench Vulkan score of 108994 suggests strong API-specific performance. The PRO V710’s FP32 rate of 27.65 TFLOPS is over double the RX 6750 GRE’s 13.21 TFLOPS, which explains why the average benchmark score favors the PRO V710 despite the DX12 loss. The RX 6750 GRE’s FP16 rate of 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) is closer, but the PRO V710’s 1:1 FP16 ratio at 27.65 TFLOPS means it does not lose throughput when switching precision.

The nearest rival data contextualizes this. The PRO V710’s closest competitors are the NVIDIA P102-100 (avg score 58528, delta 0.2%), AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, delta 0.5%), Intel Arc A570M (58239, delta 0.7%), and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, delta 1%). The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB’s rivals are AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, delta -0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56083, delta -0.7%), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, delta 1.6%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (54247, delta 2.7%). The PRO V710 sits in a higher performance tier, while the RX 6750 GRE is a step below.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every key specification except for manufacturer, memory type, bus interface, and API support (both are PCIe 4.0 x16 with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4).

• Chip: Navi 32 (PRO V710) vs Navi 22 (RX 6750 GRE)
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 vs RDNA 2.0
• Process Node: 5 nm vs 7 nm
• Transistors: 28,100 million vs 17,200 million
• Die Size: 346 mm² vs 335 mm²
• Transistor Density: 81.2M/mm² vs 51.3M/mm²
• Base Clock: 1900 MHz vs 2321 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2000 MHz vs 2581 MHz
• Game Clock: Not available vs 2439 MHz
• Memory Size: 28 GB vs 12 GB
• Memory Bus Width: 224-bit vs 192-bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 504.0 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 3456 vs 2560
• TMUs: 216 vs 160
• ROPs: 96 vs 64
• RT Cores: 54 vs 40
• Pixel Rate: 192.0 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 432.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 27.65 TFLOPS vs 13.21 TFLOPS
• FP16: 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 158 W vs 250 W
• Slot Width: Single-slot vs Dual-slot
• Power Connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
• Suggested PSU: 450 W vs 600 W
• Display Outputs: No outputs vs 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Dimensions: Not available vs 267 mm length, 110 mm height, 40 mm width
• Production Status: Not available vs Active
• Release Date: 2024-10-02 vs 2023-10-16
• Predecessor: Radeon Pro Vega vs Navi
• Successor: Not available vs Navi III

The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has a launch MSRP of 334 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more VRAM?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 12 GB. The PRO V710’s capacity is more than double.

Q: Why does the RX 6750 GRE win the 3DMark Steel Nomad test by such a large margin?

A: In the head-to-head 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the RX 6750 GRE scores 2402 versus the PRO V710’s 853, a delta of -64.5% relative to the RX 6750 GRE. The RX 6750 GRE’s boost clock of 2581 MHz is significantly higher than the PRO V710’s 2000 MHz.

Q: Which card has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The PRO V710 has 27.65 TFLOPS FP32, while the RX 6750 GRE has 13.21 TFLOPS FP32. The PRO V710 also achieves 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), compared to the RX 6750 GRE’s 26.43 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Q: How do the two cards compare in average benchmark scores?

A: The PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has an average score of 55698, in the 87th percentile.

Q: Are there physical size differences?

A: Yes. The PRO V710 is a single-slot card with no listed dimensions, while the RX 6750 GRE is dual-slot, measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Q: Which card has display outputs?

A: The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The PRO V710 has no display outputs, indicating it is designed for compute-only workloads.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. Choose the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB if your priority is DirectX 12 gaming performance—it wins the only head-to-head benchmark decisively (2402 vs 853 in Steel Nomad), has a much higher boost clock (2581 MHz vs 2000 MHz), and includes display outputs for direct monitor connection. It is also smaller in transistor count and die density, but that matters less than its gaming-oriented design.

Choose the AMD Radeon PRO V710 if you need compute density and memory capacity. It delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 versus the RX 6750 GRE’s 13.21, offers 28 GB of VRAM versus 12 GB, and achieves a higher average benchmark score (58657 vs 55698) and percentile (88 vs 87). Its single-slot design and lower 158 W TDP make it easier to integrate into dense systems, though it requires a separate GPU for display output. The RX 6750 GRE is the gaming card; the PRO V710 is the compute workhorse.