AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 represent two extremes of the GPU spectrum, separated by nearly a decade of architectural evolution and a massive gulf in target use cases. The data shows that while the Radeon Pro 560 is a legacy mobile-class part built for efficiency, the RTX 5090 D V2 is a current-generation behemoth aimed at maximum compute and rendering throughput. Comparing them directly is less about finding a winner and more about understanding which workload each was designed to service.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is competitive in legacy compute and general-purpose workloads, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 dominates in modern, high-end rendering tasks. The Radeon Pro 560’s average benchmark score of 17,551 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being integrated graphics like the AMD Radeon 780M and professional cards like the Tesla K40c. This suggests it is a capable workhorse for its era, handling 1080p-class workloads and older APIs with ease.

In contrast, the RTX 5090 D V2, with its sole benchmark score of 16,504 in the demanding 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, sits in the 59th percentile. This is not a sign of weakness; rather, it reflects the test’s extreme nature, where it competes with modern workstation cards like the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and the RX 5700 XT. The Radeon Pro 560's wins come from its compatibility and efficiency in older software environments, where its GCN architecture and 14 nm process provide stable, low-power performance. The RTX 5090 D V2 wins in any scenario requiring massive memory bandwidth, ray tracing, or the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate features, where its sheer scale of resources delivers results the older card cannot approach.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards is generational. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on the GCN 4.0 architecture, using the Polaris 21 chip, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This chip contains 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 24.4M per mm². Its memory subsystem is based on 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 81.28 GB/s of bandwidth. The card features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, with a memory clock of 1270 MHz (5.1 Gbps effective). It has no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores, as those concepts were not part of the GCN design philosophy.

The RTX 5090 D V2 is a completely different beast. It uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. This chip packs 92,200 million transistors onto a 750 mm² die, for a density of 122.9M per mm². Its memory is 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. The compute resources are staggering: 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 dedicated ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. It runs at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). This architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Radeon Pro 560 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no shared benchmark scores between the two cards in the provided data, making a direct numerical comparison impossible. However, we can interpret their relative standing through their nearest rivals and respective scores. The Radeon Pro 560’s average score of 17,551 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509) and 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468). It is also 0.2% lower than the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588) and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639). This places the Radeon Pro 560 right in the middle of a pack of modern integrated graphics and entry-level discrete cards, showing that its raw compute in OpenCL and Metal-style workloads is still competitive.

The RTX 5090 D V2’s single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0% delta) and 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415). It is 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408) and 0.9% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361). This suggests that in a specific, modern DX12 test, the RTX 5090 D V2 is performing in line with professional workstation cards, which is a strong indicator of its capability in high-end CAD and content creation. The data implies that while the Radeon Pro 560 excels in generalized compute benchmarks, the RTX 5090 D V2 is designed to excel in the specific, heavy geometry and feature-set tests that modern games and pro applications use.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher raw compute throughput (FP32)?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has a FP32 rating of 104.8 TFLOPS, which is vastly superior to the AMD Radeon Pro 560’s 1.858 TFLOPS.

Q: Are these cards comparable in terms of memory capacity?

A: No. The Radeon Pro 560 has 4 GB of GDDR5, while the RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7, a six-fold difference in capacity and a generational leap in type.

Q: Does the NVIDIA card support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5090 D V2 includes 170 dedicated ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 has no ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the production status of these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is marked as End-of-life, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is listed as Active.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s, compared to the Radeon Pro 560’s 14.51 GPixel/s.

Q: What is the power connector requirement for each?

A: The Radeon Pro 560 requires no power connectors, while the RTX 5090 D V2 requires a single 16-pin connector.

The Verdict

The data clearly dictates who should pick which card. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is for users with legacy systems or specific workloads that require a low-power, integrated form factor (IGP) with no external power needs. Its 75 W TDP and PCIe 3.0 x8 interface make it suitable for compact or older Mac Pro systems where space and power are at a premium. Its benchmark performance is comparable to modern iGPUs, meaning it is best suited for basic 2D acceleration, office tasks, or older game titles that do not demand modern API features.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is for professionals and enthusiasts who need uncompromised performance in modern DirectX 12 Ultimate applications, ray-traced rendering, and AI-accelerated tasks via its tensor cores. With a 575 W TDP, a suggested 950 W PSU, and a dual-slot design, it is a desktop-only component. Its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth are essential for large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and data-heavy compute loads. If you are building a new high-end workstation or gaming rig, the RTX 5090 D V2 is the only choice. The Radeon Pro 560 is simply not a competitor in any modern, demanding scenario, but it remains a functional relic of its time.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 3,000 million | 92,200 million |

| Die Size | 123 mm² | 750 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 24.4M / mm² | 122.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | None | 2017 MHz |

| Boost Clock | None | 2407 MHz |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | 128 bit | 384 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 1.34 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 21760 |

| TMUs | 64 | 680 |

| ROPs | 16 | 176 |

| RT Cores | None | 170 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 680 |

| Pixel Rate | 14.51 GPixel/s | 423.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 58.05 GTexel/s | 1,636.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 1.858 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 75 W | 575 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.3 | 1.4 |