GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP

CORE STATE Raphael
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A750

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
2,612
geekbench_opencl
N/A
98,554
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
85,631
passmark_directx_10
N/A
65
passmark_directx_11
N/A
72
passmark_directx_12
N/A
70
passmark_directx_9
N/A
181
passmark_g2d
N/A
732
passmark_g3d
N/A
12,534
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
5,368

Analysis: AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP vs Intel Arc A750

The graphics card comparison between the Arc A750 and GeForce AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP demonstrates surprisingly competitive results. The two GPUs trade victories throughout different games, with not one establishing a clear lead. The score results validates this observation. None of the option excels reliably. Those confront a actual selection between them.

If gaming capability is this close, value and features get the deciding elements. Consider RT performance support, DLSS/FSR support, power consumption, and ecosystem maturity when selecting between the Arc A750 and GeForce AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP. All these factors can affect the scales. Weigh holistically. This complete perspective plays a role.

Playing games results similarly show similar performance between the Arc A750 and GeForce AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP. Frame rates deltas generally sit under margin of error. This minor deltas are hardly detectable during real gaming sessions. Either cards provide responsive experiences. Gaming enthusiasts could decide comfortably between both cards.

All things considered, this evaluation between the Arc A750 and GeForce AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP results in a near deadlock. Frame rate gaps are minimal and doubtful to affect real-world scenarios. Direct your determination on cost, software preferences, and individual functionality needs. Each are strong picks. This balance is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Graphics 128SP
A750
Core Specs
Shading Units
128
3,584 +2700.0%
Shaders
128
3,584 +2700.0%
TMUs
8
224 +2700.0%
ROPs
8
112 +1300.0%
Compute Units
2
Execution Units
448
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
268.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
563.2 GFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
35.20 GFLOPS (1:16)
2.150 TFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
1,126.4 GFLOPS (2:1)
34.41 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
2
28 +1300.0%
XMX Cores
448
Power
TDP
15 W
225 W
TDP (W)
15
225 +1400.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Raphael
DG2-512
Generation
Navi II IGP (Raphael)
Alchemist (Arc 7)
Process Size
5 nm
6 nm
Transistors
3,400 million
21,700 million
Die Size
264 mm²
406 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
12.9M / mm²
53.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
289 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Xe Graphics
Successor
Navi III IGP
Battlemage
View Radeon Graphics 128SP Details View Arc A750 Details