AMD Radeon 860M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

AMD Radeon 860M and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum. The 860M is an integrated graphics processor built for mobile efficiency, while the LX ULTRA is a large discrete add-in card with dedicated memory and a much higher power envelope. The recorded data shows two fundamentally different designs with distinct performance profiles, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are absent. The 860M has two measured scores, the LX ULTRA has none. The analysis below is based on the available measurements and the architectural specifications in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, derived from its Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 72.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: The LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50. The database contains no measured performance data for this card.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 860M sits within a tight cluster. It is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (average score 26421), 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (average score 26331), 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (average score 26553), and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (average score 26683).

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Radeon 860M uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and memory clock of 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the power draw of each GPU?

A: The Radeon 860M has a 15 W TDP and is an IGP with no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a higher version of Vulkan?

A: The Radeon 860M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What are the release dates for these GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M was released on 2025-02-28. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16, which is later in the database timeline.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation by use case. The AMD Radeon 860M is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark results. Its average score of 26401 places it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs in the database. This is a functional integrated solution that delivers competitive performance for its class, as shown by its near parity with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and the RTX 5060 in the nearest rival cluster. The 860M also has a very low 15 W TDP, making it suitable for portable systems where power consumption is a primary constraint. The Vulkan score of 30043 is notably higher than its OpenCL score of 22759, indicating strong performance under that specific API.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA cannot be assessed on measured performance because the database has no benchmark entries for it. Its percentile of 50 is a positional value, not a performance measurement. What the specifications show is a high-end discrete card: 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16. These figures are far above the 860M in raw throughput. The LX ULTRA also has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. This is a desktop component designed for sustained heavy workloads, not for power-limited mobile systems.

For a system builder choosing between these two, the decision rests on form factor and workload demands. If the requirement is an integrated GPU with verified benchmark scores, low power draw, and no additional cooling or power infrastructure, the Radeon 860M is the only option with data. If the requirement is a discrete card with dedicated memory and high compute throughput, the LX ULTRA offers the specifications, but no measured verification in the database. The 860M is the safer choice for validated performance; the LX ULTRA is the choice for raw capability on paper.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for the AMD Radeon 860M versus the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The wins count for both GPUs is 0. This means no direct comparison of the two cards under identical test conditions exists in the recorded data.

The only measurable performance data comes from the Radeon 860M. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 22759, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 30043. The difference between the two scores is significant. The Vulkan result is 7284 points higher than the OpenCL result. This indicates that the 860M delivers better performance under the Vulkan API in the recorded tests. The average of the two scores, 26401, is the figure used for its percentile ranking.

The nearest rival data for the 860M provides additional context. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 has an average score of 26421, which is 0.1% higher than the 860M. This is a negligible margin. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has an average score of 26331, which is 0.3% lower than the 860M. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary has an average score of 26553, which is 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 has an average score of 26683, which is 1.1% higher. The 860M is positioned in the middle of this group, with the largest gap being the 1.1% deficit to the RTX A4000. These deltas are all small, showing that the 860M performs at a level consistent with these discrete and professional cards in the database, despite being an integrated part.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and no head-to-head results. The database does not provide any measured performance comparison for this card. Its specifications suggest high throughput, but the absence of data means it cannot be placed in the same performance ranking as the 860M or the 860M's rivals.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification field.

Memory: The Radeon 860M uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective. The LX ULTRA has a fixed, dedicated memory pool; the 860M has no dedicated memory of its own.

Compute units: The Radeon 860M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The LX ULTRA has 12 times the shading units, 6 times the TMUs, and 6 times the ROPs.

Ray tracing: The Radeon 860M has 8 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded ray tracing core count.

Clocks: The Radeon 860M has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded base or boost clock.

Rates and throughput: The Radeon 860M has a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA is 4 times faster in pixel rate, 4 times faster in texture rate, 8 times faster in FP32, and 16 times faster in FP16.

Power and cooling: The Radeon 860M has a 15 W TDP, is an IGP with a slot width of IGP, and has no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Bus interface: The Radeon 860M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: The Radeon 860M has portable device dependent display outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Dimensions: The Radeon 860M has no recorded dimensions, as it is an integrated part. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length (10.6 inches), 112 mm in height (4.4 inches), and 40 mm in width (1.6 inches).

Process node: Both are built by TSMC, but on different nodes. The Radeon 860M uses a 4 nm process. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process.

Vulkan support: The Radeon 860M supports Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release date: The Radeon 860M was released on 2025-02-28. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 860M is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture. Its chip is called Krackan Point, and it belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The architecture includes 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The FP16 to FP32 ratio is 1:1, meaning the card delivers equal throughput in both precision formats. The 860M is a successor to the Navi II IGP generation, and its production status is active.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is built on an architecture called TrueGPU. Its chip is designated 7G105, and it belongs to the 7G100 generation. It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The architecture includes 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. There is no recorded ray tracing core count for this card. The FP16 to FP32 ratio is 2:1, meaning FP16 throughput is double the FP32 throughput. The LX ULTRA has no recorded predecessor or successor in the database.

The architectural differences are substantial. The LX ULTRA uses a larger process node (6 nm versus 4 nm), but compensates with a much larger compute configuration. The shading unit count of 6144 versus 512 gives the LX ULTRA a 12 fold advantage in raw shader throughput. The TMU count of 192 versus 32 gives a 6 fold advantage in texture operations. The ROP count of 96 versus 16 gives a 6 fold advantage in pixel output. These differences align with the throughput figures: the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 3.072 TFLOPS for the 860M, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 3.072 TFLOPS.

The ray tracing capability differs. The 860M includes 8 ray tracing cores, a feature of the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The LX ULTRA has no recorded ray tracing core count, which may indicate the architecture does not implement dedicated ray tracing hardware or that the data is simply not available. The API support is nearly identical, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan versions differ (1.4 for the 860M, 1.3 for the LX ULTRA), which aligns with the newer release date of the 860M.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The 860M relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth dependent on the host system. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement is typical of discrete GPUs, while the shared memory arrangement is typical of integrated graphics.

The power architecture also differs. The 860M draws 15 W and requires no external power connectors, fitting the IGP form factor. The LX ULTRA draws 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and needs a 550 W suggested PSU. The physical size difference is notable: the LX ULTRA is 268 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, while the 860M has no dimensions because it is integrated into a processor package.

The release timeline shows the 860M appearing first, with a release date of 2025-02-28. The LX ULTRA has a later release date of 2026-03-16. The 860M is noted as an active production part with a predecessor, the Navi II IGP. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor or successor listed. The manufacturer for the LX ULTRA is listed as unknown, with the chip and generation names (7G105, 7G100) being the only identifiers. The 860M is clearly attributed to AMD with the Krackan Point chip.

The process node difference (4 nm for the 860M, 6 nm for the LX ULTRA) suggests the 860M uses a denser manufacturing process. The LX ULTRA uses a larger node but far more compute resources. The combination of a larger node and a much larger chip explains the 225 W power draw. The 860M's 15 W power draw reflects both the smaller node and the reduced compute configuration. The two designs are optimized for different constraints: the 860M for low power and integration, the LX ULTRA for high throughput and dedicated memory.