AMD Radeon 860M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The AMD Radeon 860M and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy entirely different segments of the graphics hardware spectrum. The 860M is an integrated graphics processor designed for low-power mobile systems, while the LX 7G100 is a large discrete graphics card with dedicated memory and a much higher power envelope. The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the two, so analysis relies on their respective specifications, theoretical rates, and the limited benchmark results available for the AMD part. The verdict, based strictly on the database records, is that these products are not competitors: the LX 7G100 offers dramatically higher raw throughput and memory resources, while the 860M provides a compact, low-power solution with a strong performance percentile for its class.

The Verdict

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the clear performance leader by every measurable specification in the database. Its FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, roughly eight times the 3.072 TFLOPS of the AMD Radeon 860M. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is four times the 96.00 GTexel/s of the 860M, and its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is also four times the 48.00 GPixel/s of the integrated part. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the 860M uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. For applications that require sustained high-resolution rendering, large textures, or compute workloads that benefit from massive memory bandwidth, the LX 7G100 is the only choice based on the data.

The AMD Radeon 860M, however, delivers a much different set of advantages. It is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Its benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043, producing an average benchmark score of 26401. The database places the 860M in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, which indicates that for an integrated solution it performs well above the median. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning its real-world performance cannot be verified from the recorded data. Therefore, the 860M is the verified performer in the benchmarks that exist, while the LX 7G100 is the theoretical performance monster whose actual results are unrecorded.

The choice between these two depends entirely on the use case. For a portable, low-power device where the GPU must share system memory and operate within a 15 W envelope, the Radeon 860M is the appropriate part. For a desktop system with a 550 W suggested power supply, a dual-slot card with an 8-pin connector, and a need for maximum compute and memory bandwidth, the LX 7G100 is the appropriate part. There is no overlap in their intended roles, and the data does not suggest that either could substitute for the other.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 860M is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture using a 4 nm process node at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile and uses the Krackan Point chip. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU includes 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster operation units, and 8 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 600 MHz and its boost clock is 3000 MHz. The FP16 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning there is no half-rate FP16 advantage. The 860M has no dedicated tensor cores listed, and its memory subsystem is entirely system shared, with bus width and memory type also listed as system shared.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process node, also at TSMC. It belongs to the 7G100 generation and uses the 7G106 chip. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, a slightly older Vulkan version than the AMD part. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, which are 12 times, 6 times, and 6 times the counts of the 860M respectively. It does not list any ray tracing cores, while the 860M lists 8. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock values recorded, so clock speed comparisons are impossible. Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio to FP32, indicating that it can perform FP16 calculations at twice the rate of FP32, a capability the 860M lacks. The process nodes differ, with the 860M at 4 nm and the LX 7G100 at 6 nm, which suggests the AMD part uses a denser manufacturing process, though the LX 7G100 compensates with far larger absolute resources.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon 860M has two recorded benchmark tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has none. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis must rely on the theoretical specification differences and the 860M's individual scores.

The 860M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 produce an average benchmark score of 26401. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26421 and a delta of -0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with an average score of 26331 and a delta of 0.3%, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with an average score of 26553 and a delta of -0.6%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 with an average score of 26683 and a delta of -1.1%. These deltas are all within 1.1% of the 860M's average score, indicating that the integrated AMD part performs on par with a range of discrete and professional GPUs in these synthetic tests.

The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals, so its position in the database is based purely on its specification sheet. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 12 GB GDDR6 memory are all far beyond the 860M's capabilities, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how that theoretical performance translates into real workloads. The 860M, by contrast, has verified scores that place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, a strong result for an integrated graphics processor.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Radeon 860M uses a 4 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process. The 860M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, while the LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The 860M lists 8 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists none. The 860M has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded clocks. The 860M's memory is system shared with system-dependent bandwidth, while the LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS for the 860M versus 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100. The FP16 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for the AMD part versus 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio for the Lisuan part. Pixel rates are 48.00 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 96.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. The TDP is 15 W for the 860M versus 225 W for the LX 7G100. The 860M is an IGP with no power connectors, while the LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 860M versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX 7G100. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the 860M versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX 7G100. The LX 7G100 has physical dimensions of 294 mm length, 120 mm height, and 49 mm width, while the 860M has no recorded dimensions. The Vulkan API version differs, with the 860M supporting 1.4 and the LX 7G100 supporting 1.3. The release dates differ as well, with the 860M released on February 28, 2025 and the LX 7G100 on June 17, 2026.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to 3.072 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon 860M, making it roughly eight times faster in this metric.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 860M have dedicated memory?

A: No, the 860M uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth. The LX 7G100, by contrast, has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the LX 7G100. The AMD Radeon 860M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has a TDP of 15 W and uses no power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has more texture mapping units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 192 TMUs, while the AMD Radeon 860M has 32 TMUs, a sixfold difference.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 860M wins in scenarios defined by low power and integration. Its 15 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and IGP form factor make it suitable for portable devices where space and cooling are limited. The 860M's 4 nm process node provides a manufacturing advantage in density, and its 8 ray tracing cores give it a feature that the LX 7G100 does not list. The 860M's verified benchmark scores, including a 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, show that it delivers competitive performance in synthetic tests despite its integrated nature. Its nearest rivals in the database, including the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and RTX 5060, have average scores within 1.1% of the 860M, demonstrating that it holds its own against discrete options in those specific tests. The 860M also supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer version than the LX 7G100's 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in every raw specification category. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s dwarf the 860M's corresponding figures. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fundamental advantage for workloads that exceed the capacity or speed of system-shared memory. The 192-bit bus width and 2250 MHz memory clock with 18 Gbps effective speed provide a dedicated memory pipeline that the 860M cannot match. The LX 7G100's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface offers double the lane width of the 860M's x8 interface. The card's dual-slot design, 8-pin power connector, and 550 W suggested PSU indicate it is built for desktop systems with robust power delivery. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, a capability the 860M lacks as a portable-device-dependent output. The LX 7G100 also supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio to FP32, allowing accelerated half-precision compute, while the 860M's FP16 operates at a 1:1 ratio.

The database records no benchmark wins for either product in a head-to-head comparison, as no such tests exist. The 860M's wins are confined to its verified benchmark scores and efficiency metrics. The LX 7G100's wins are theoretical, based on its specification sheet. For users who need maximum compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity, the LX 7G100 is the only option with the required specifications. For users who need an integrated GPU that consumes minimal power and still performs in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, the 860M is the verified choice. The two products serve different markets, and the data does not indicate any scenario where one could replace the other.