AMD Radeon 840M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data set contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon 840M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. However, the recorded measurements for the RTX 5070 Ti provide a clear picture of its performance tier. The RTX 5070 Ti holds an average benchmark score of 49,957 across all recorded tests, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Radeon 840M has a percentile rank of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, indicating that no benchmark entries exist for the integrated part.

For the RTX 507 Ti, the strongest recorded result comes from the Geekbench Vulkan test with a score of 225,122, followed closely by Geekbench OpenCL at 212,363. In the Passmark suite, the G3D score reaches 32,974, while the GPU compute score sits at 20,203. DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 results register at 351 and 300 respectively, with DirectX 10 at 192 and DirectX 12 at 127. The G2D score of 1,332 reflects 2D desktop performance. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the card records 6,604.

Relative to its nearest rivals in the database, the RTX 5070 Ti shows a mixed competitive position. Against the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which has an average score of 50,001, the RTX 5070 Ti trails by 0.1 percent. Against the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with an average of 50,951, the deficit is 2 percent. The RTX 5070 Ti leads the Intel Arc A550M (average 49,737) by 0.4 percent and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (average 48,477) by 3.1 percent. These margins place the RTX 5070 Ti in a narrow band around the RX Vega 64 and RX 6900 XT, with performance differences that are statistically small but measurable.

Since the Radeon 840M has no benchmark scores recorded, the database cannot establish a direct quantitative comparison. The absence of data for the integrated GPU means all head-to-head analysis relies solely on the RTX 5070 Ti's measured outputs and its standing among discrete graphics cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti achieves an average benchmark score of 49,957 across all recorded tests in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti trails the RX Vega 64 by 0.1 percent. The RX Vega 64 has an average score of 50,001, while the RTX 5070 Ti averages 49,957.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 840M have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Radeon 840M, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti ranks in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the Radeon 840M ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which benchmark produces the highest score for the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Geekbench Vulkan test produces the highest recorded score at 225,122, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 212,363.

Q: What is the difference between the RTX 5070 Ti and the Intel Arc A550M in average score?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti leads the Intel Arc A550M by 0.4 percent. The Arc A550M has an average score of 49,737.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 840M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its chip is designated Krackan Point, and it belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process, also from TSMC, with the GB203 chip in the GeForce 50 series.

The Radeon 840M contains 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 render output units. It features 4 ray tracing cores but no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, packs 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The transistor counts differ enormously: the RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The Radeon 840M's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Memory architecture separates the two completely. The Radeon 840M uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, meaning it draws from the host system's RAM. The RTX 5070 Ti comes with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for the RTX 5070 Ti is listed at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, while the Radeon 840M's memory clock is system dependent.

Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The Radeon 840M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti operates at a base of 2295 MHz and boosts to 2452 MHz. The power envelope is equally distinct: the Radeon 840M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 Ti draws 300 W and uses a single 16-pin connector, with a suggested PSU of 700 W.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interfaces differ, with the Radeon 840M using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the RTX 5070 Ti using PCIe 5.0 x16. The RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the Radeon 840M is an IGP with no physical slot width.

The Verdict

The data points to a complete separation in performance class. The RTX 5070 Ti is a high-end discrete graphics card with a substantial transistor budget, dedicated GDDR7 memory, and a 300 W power envelope. Its average benchmark score of 49,957 and 86th percentile ranking demonstrate strong performance among all recorded GPUs. The Radeon 840M, with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking, serves a fundamentally different role as a low-power integrated solution.

For users seeking maximum graphics throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only choice supported by measured data. Its nearest rivals in the database, the RX Vega 64 and RX 6900 XT, sit within 0.1 to 2 percent of its average score, confirming that it competes at the upper tier of discrete graphics. The RTX 5070 Ti's 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, features absent from the Radeon 840M's 4 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

The Radeon 840M's 15 W TDP and system shared memory make it suitable for portable devices where power efficiency is paramount. Its 4 nm process node and RDNA 3.5 architecture represent modern integrated graphics design, but the absence of benchmark data means no quantitative performance claims can be made. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, has verified performance across multiple test suites, including 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs:

• Architecture: RDNA 3.5 vs Blackwell 2.0
• Process Node: 4 nm vs 5 nm
• Transistors: unknown vs 45,600 million
• Die Size: unknown vs 378 mm²
• Transistor Density: not listed vs 120.6M / mm²
• Base Clock: 400 MHz vs 2295 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2900 MHz vs 2452 MHz
• Memory Size: System Shared vs 16 GB
• Memory Type: System Shared vs GDDR7
• Memory Bus Width: System Shared vs 256 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent vs 896.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 256 vs 8,960
• TMUs: 16 vs 280
• ROPs: 8 vs 96
• RT Cores: 4 vs 70
• Tensor Cores: not listed vs 280
• Pixel Rate: 23.20 GPixel/s vs 235.4 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 46.40 GTexel/s vs 686.6 GTexel/s
• FP32: 1,484.8 GFLOPS vs 43.94 TFLOPS
• FP16: 1,484.8 GFLOPS (1:1) vs 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 15 W vs 300 W
• Slot Width: IGP vs Dual-slot
• Power Connectors: None vs 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: not listed vs 700 W
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 vs PCIe 5.0 x16
• Display Outputs: Portable Device Dependent vs 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• Dimensions: not listed vs 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti dominates in every measurable performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is orders of magnitude higher than the Radeon 840M's 1,484.8 GFLOPS. The texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s versus 46.40 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s versus 23.20 GPixel/s further illustrate the gap. The RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a memory advantage that the Radeon 840M cannot match with system shared memory.

The Radeon 840M wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 15 W TDP allows deployment in thin and light portable devices without discrete cooling solutions. The absence of power connectors and IGP form factor mean no additional power supply requirements. The 4 nm process node provides a manufacturing advantage over the 5 nm node used by the RTX 5070 Ti, though this does not translate into performance gains.

In terms of API support, both GPUs offer identical DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan versions, so software compatibility does not differentiate them. The RTX 5070 Ti's tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for AI and deep learning workloads, a capability the Radeon 840M lacks entirely. The RTX 5070 Ti's 70 ray tracing cores enable hardware ray tracing, while the Radeon 840M's 4 ray tracing cores offer minimal RT capability.

For compute-intensive tasks such as rendering, simulation, or machine learning, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice based on its measured performance and hardware feature set. For ultra-portable computing where battery life and thermal output are primary concerns, the Radeon 840M's 15 W envelope and integrated design serve a distinct purpose. The database records no benchmark wins for either GPU in direct comparison, but the RTX 5070 Ti's extensive benchmark results and 86th percentile ranking establish its performance class unequivocally.