AMD Radeon 840M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 840M

CORE STATE Krackan Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2475 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

Analysis: AMD Radeon 840M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 840M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 occupy completely different segments of the graphics hardware spectrum. The Radeon 840M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built into the Krackan Point mobile chip, designed for power-conscious portable devices. The RTX 4070 AD103 is a discrete, dual-slot desktop graphics card from the GeForce 40-series, built for high-performance desktop workloads.

The Radeon 840M wins in power efficiency and system integration. Its 15 W TDP is dramatically lower than the RTX 4070 AD103's 200 W TDP. The IGP requires no power connectors, uses system-shared memory, and has no physical dimensions listed, as it is embedded into the processor package. It targets devices where portability and battery life take priority over raw performance.

The RTX 4070 AD103 wins in every performance category. It delivers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 1,484.8 GFLOPS for the Radeon 840M. It has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, while the Radeon 840M relies on system-shared memory with bandwidth that is system dependent. The RTX 4070 AD103 has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations units, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The Radeon 840M has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores.

The RTX 4070 AD103 is also the only one of the two with a dedicated tensor core count, making it suitable for AI-accelerated workloads. The Radeon 840M has no tensor cores listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature support is identical.

The RTX 4070 AD103 has a 240 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width, requiring a dual-slot cooling solution and a 16-pin power connector. The Radeon 840M is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and display outputs that are portable device dependent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS, which is approximately 19.6 times the 1,484.8 GFLOPS of the Radeon 840M.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 840M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Radeon 840M has a 15 W TDP, while the RTX 4070 AD103 has a 200 W TDP. The Radeon uses no power connectors, whereas the RTX card requires a 16-pin connector and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 4070 AD103 has 46 ray tracing cores. The Radeon 840M has 4 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for each?

A: The Radeon 840M uses TSMC's 4 nm process node. The RTX 4070 AD103 uses TSMC's 5 nm process node and has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: The Radeon 840M is listed as Active, with a release date of 2025-02-28. The RTX 4070 AD103 is listed as End-of-life, with a release date of 2024-02-29.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. Neither GPU has any benchmark entries in the database, and both have an average benchmark score of zero. Both GPUs sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database's ranking system.

The absence of measured benchmark data means direct performance comparisons must be derived from the specification differences. The FP32 compute gap is the most pronounced: 29.15 TFLOPS versus 1,484.8 GFLOPS. This represents a 19.6x advantage for the RTX 4070 AD103. In pixel throughput, the RTX card achieves 158.4 GPixel/s against 23.20 GPixel/s for the Radeon 840M, a 6.8x difference. Texture rate shows 455.4 GTexel/s versus 46.40 GTexel/s, a 9.8x gap.

Memory bandwidth separates the two even further. The RTX 4070 AD103 provides 504.2 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth, while the Radeon 840M's bandwidth is classified as system dependent with no fixed value. The RTX card also has a fixed memory clock of 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, whereas the Radeon uses system-shared memory with no specified clock.

The RTX 4070 AD103 has a higher base clock at 1920 MHz versus 400 MHz, but the Radeon 840M has a higher boost clock at 2900 MHz versus 2475 MHz. The Radeon's boost advantage does not compensate for its far lower shading unit count: 256 versus 5,888.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Radeon 840M has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4070 AD103 has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 46 ray tracing cores. The RTX card also has 184 tensor cores, while the Radeon has none listed.

The process nodes differ: the Radeon uses 4 nm, the RTX card uses 5 nm. The RTX card has a known transistor count of 45,900 million and a die size of 379 mm², with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Radeon's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Memory configurations are fundamentally different. The Radeon uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RTX card uses 12 GB of GDDR6X with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Power requirements diverge sharply. The Radeon has a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX card has a 200 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W PSU.

The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the Radeon versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX card. Display outputs also differ: the Radeon's outputs are portable device dependent, while the RTX card provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Physical dimensions apply only to the RTX card: 240 mm length, 110 mm height, 40 mm width, and dual-slot width. The Radeon is classified as an IGP with no dimensions.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon 840M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on the Krackan Point chip, belonging to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. Its predecessor is the Navi II IGP. It has a 4 nm process node from TSMC.

The RTX 4070 AD103 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD103 chip, belonging to the GeForce 40-series generation. Its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. It uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC.

The Radeon 840M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. Its FP16 performance is 1,484.8 GFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32. The RTX card has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. Its FP16 performance is 29.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32.

The Radeon has no tensor cores, while the RTX card has 184 tensor cores, reflecting NVIDIA's dedicated AI acceleration hardware. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX card's launch MSRP was 599 USD. Its production status is end-of-life, while the Radeon remains active. The Radeon's release date is 2025-02-28, and the RTX card's release date is 2024-02-29.

The Radeon 840M's memory clock is listed as "System Shared," and its memory type is also "System Shared." The RTX card's memory clock is 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, using GDDR6X memory. The RTX card's rasterization rates are 158.4 GPixel/s and 455.4 GTexel/s, versus 23.20 GPixel/s and 46.40 GTexel/s for the Radeon.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
840M
RTX 4070 AD103
Core Specs
Shading Units
256
5,888 +2200.0%
Shaders
256
5,888 +2200.0%
TMUs
16
184 +1050.0%
ROPs
8
64 +700.0%
Compute Units
4
—
SM Count
—
46
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1920 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2475 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
12,288
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
504.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
1024 KB
36 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
46.40 GTexel/s
455.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1,484.8 GFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
92.80 GFLOPS (1:16)
455.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
1,484.8 GFLOPS (1:1)
29.15 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
4
46 +1050.0%
Tensor Cores
—
184
Power
TDP
15 W
200 W
TDP (W)
15
200 +1233.3%
Suggested PSU
—
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Krackan Point
AD103
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 40
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,900 million
Die Size
unknown
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
—
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
240 mm 9.4 inches
Height
—
110 mm 4.3 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
599 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 30
Successor
—
GeForce 50
View Radeon 840M Details View GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 Details