AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

AMD Radeon 820M is an integrated graphics processor built for mobile platforms, while NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-end discrete add-in board. The recorded database shows a single benchmark result for the NVIDIA part, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scored 6269.5. The AMD Radeon 820M has no benchmark entries in the database, so its performance cannot be directly quantified with a score. The percentile ranking places the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 36, meaning 64% of all GPUs in the database score higher, a surprisingly low position for a card with such a high raw score. The AMD Radeon 820M sits at the 50th percentile, but with an average benchmark score of zero, this ranking reflects its status as an unmeasured integrated part rather than actual tested performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only head-to-head comparison available comes from the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result. The AMD Radeon 820M has no benchmark scores recorded, so no direct numerical comparison can be made from the database. The NVIDIA card's score of 6269.5 places it near a cluster of older and lower-end parts according to the nearest rivals list. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6270, a delta of 0% relative to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, meaning the two cards produce effectively identical results in this test. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, 0.9% above the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's measured performance lands in a tight band around 6270 points, with no rival in the list exceeding it by even a full percent.

Because the AMD Radeon 820M has no benchmark data, the database cannot show any wins for either side in a formal head-to-head. The wins counter shows 0 for both items. What the data does reveal is that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, despite its modern architecture and high specifications, produces a benchmark score that is statistically indistinguishable from several much older or lower-tier products. The Quadro K620, a workstation card from a previous generation, actually edges out the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER by 0.2%. The Radeon R7 M350, a mobile discrete GPU, leads by 0.9%. This pattern suggests that the single recorded test result may not reflect the card's overall capability, or that the test conditions produced an outlier. The data does not support any conclusion about the AMD Radeon 820M's performance relative to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, as no measurements exist for the integrated part.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 820M cannot be assigned any benchmark wins because the database contains no scores for it. Its strengths must be inferred from its specifications alone. It uses system-shared memory, which means it has no dedicated VRAM allocation, and its memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent. This design suits lightweight tasks where integrated graphics can share the system memory pool. The Radeon 820M has 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units. It includes 2 ray tracing cores, a feature that brings hardware ray tracing to an integrated part. Its pixel rate is 11.20 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 22.40 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 716.8 GFLOPS, and FP16 is also 716.8 GFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The GPU operates with a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The thermal design power is 15 W, which makes it suitable for thin and light portable devices where power consumption is a primary constraint. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and it has no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only measured benchmark in the database, but that win is not against the AMD part. The score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 confirms it can execute modern DX12 workloads. The nearest rival data shows the card is essentially tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at a 0% delta. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also leads the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8%. These are the only quantitative wins the database records. The card's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that dominates the system-dependent memory of the AMD integrated part, though no direct comparison test exists. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It contains 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 compute reaches 43.94 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. Base clock is 2295 MHz and boost clock is 2452 MHz. The card carries a 350 W TDP and requires a 16-pin power connector.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use entirely different architectures. AMD's Radeon 820M is built on RDNA 3.5, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point mobile, using the Krackan Point 2 chip. NVIDIA's RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with the GB203 chip. The process node difference is small, with AMD using 4 nm and NVIDIA using 5 nm, but both are produced by TSMC. The transistor counts could not be more different. The AMD part's transistor count is unknown, while the NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The AMD die size is also unknown.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The Radeon 820M uses system-shared memory for both capacity and type, with a system-shared bus width and bandwidth listed as system dependent. This means the GPU borrows from the host system's RAM, and performance scales with the system memory configuration. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has dedicated 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate. The NVIDIA card's memory subsystem is self-contained and does not compete with the CPU for bandwidth.

Compute resources show a massive scale difference. The Radeon 820M has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA card has 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, while the AMD part has 2 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The FP32 throughput difference is stark: 716.8 GFLOPS for the AMD part versus 43.94 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA part. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD Radeon 820M has a base clock of 400 MHz and boosts to 2800 MHz, a wide range that reflects the power management of an integrated part. The NVIDIA card runs at a base of 2295 MHz and boosts to 2452 MHz, a much narrower range. The AMD part's higher boost clock relative to its base indicates aggressive frequency scaling under load. The NVIDIA card's TDP is 350 W, compared to 15 W for the AMD part. The power connectors reflect this: the AMD IGP has none, while the NVIDIA card uses a 16-pin connector. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the AMD part is an IGP with no dimensions listed. The bus interface also differs, with the AMD part using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the NVIDIA card using PCIe 5.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: What is the single benchmark score recorded for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The database records a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with an average benchmark score of 6270.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: It is tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at a 0% delta, leads the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8%, trails the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2%, and trails the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9%.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 820M have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database shows no benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon 820M, and its average benchmark score is 0, so no performance measurements exist for it.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP is 749 USD.

The Verdict

The data supports only one clear conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a measured benchmark result and the AMD Radeon 820M does not. The NVIDIA card's score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while closely matched by several older rivals, confirms it can complete a modern DX12 workload. The AMD part's absence from the benchmark database means no performance verdict can be issued for it based on measurements. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two with a verified score, so any user requiring tested performance data must choose it.

The specification sheets tell a different but complementary story. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER offers 8960 shading units, 70 ray tracing cores, 280 tensor cores, and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 820M offers 128 shading units, 2 ray tracing cores, no tensor cores, and shared system memory. The FP32 compute difference is two orders of magnitude, 43.94 TFLOPS versus 716.8 GFLOPS. The NVIDIA card's 350 W TDP and dual-slot footprint indicate a desktop-oriented discrete GPU, while the AMD part's 15 W TDP and IGP form factor target integrated mobile graphics.

The percentile data complicates the picture for the NVIDIA card. Its 36th percentile ranking means most GPUs in the database score higher, which is inconsistent with its high-end specifications. The nearest rival comparisons show it performing within 1% of the Quadro K620, Radeon R7 M350, and FirePro W600, all of which are far older or lower-tier products. This suggests the single recorded benchmark may not represent the card's typical performance, or the measurement conditions were unusual. Regardless, the database contains no alternative score for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, so this is the only data point available.

For the AMD Radeon 820M, the absence of benchmark data is the most important fact. It cannot be compared to any rival in the database, including the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Its 50th percentile ranking is assigned without a tested score, so it carries no performance weight. The specifications show a low-power integrated GPU suited to basic graphics tasks, but no measured evidence supports a performance claim. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, despite its mediocre percentile, is the only part in this comparison with a recorded score, and that score is far above what the AMD part's specifications would suggest, though no direct test confirms it.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The AMD Radeon 820M uses the Krackan Point 2 chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm process, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process. The NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die with a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter; the AMD part's transistor count and die size are unknown. The AMD base clock is 400 MHz and boost is 2800 MHz, while the NVIDIA base is 2295 MHz and boost is 2452 MHz. Memory differs completely: the AMD part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock at 28 Gbps effective.

Shader resources differ by orders of magnitude. The AMD part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, while the NVIDIA card has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Ray tracing cores are 2 for AMD and 70 for NVIDIA. Tensor cores are absent from the AMD part and number 280 on the NVIDIA card. Pixel rate is 11.20 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 22.40 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 716.8 GFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS, and FP16 is identical at 716.8 GFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS, both with a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical characteristics diverge sharply. The AMD part has a 15 W TDP, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The NVIDIA card has a 350 W TDP, a dual-slot width, a 16-pin power connector, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the AMD part, while the NVIDIA card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The AMD part has no dimensions listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part was released on 2025-02-28, while the NVIDIA card has a release date of 2025-12-31. The launch MSRP for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 749 USD, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP listed.