AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results between the AMD Radeon 820M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. The Radeon 820M has no recorded benchmark scores, while the RTX 5070 Ti has ten recorded tests. This makes a direct comparison impossible on a test-by-test basis. Instead, the comparison relies on the RTX 5070 Ti's absolute scores and its position relative to other GPUs in the database.

The RTX 5070 Ti delivers substantial compute performance across multiple APIs. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 225122, which is its highest recorded result. Its OpenCL score is 212363, slightly lower but still in the same performance class. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU achieves 6604, a result that reflects its DirectX 12 rendering capability. PassMark G3D shows 32974, while PassMark GPU Compute records 20203. Legacy DirectX tests show lower scores: PassMark DirectX 9 at 351, DirectX 11 at 300, DirectX 10 at 192, and DirectX 12 at 127. The PassMark G2D score of 1332 covers 2D graphics workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti's average benchmark score is 49957. Its percentile ranking sits at 86, meaning it outperforms 86 percent of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 averages 50001, which is 0.1 percent higher than the RTX 5070 Ti. The Intel Arc A550M averages 49737, putting it 0.4 percent lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT averages 50951, a 2 percent advantage over the RTX 5070 Ti. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT averages 48477, which is 3.1 percent lower. These deltas show the RTX 5070 Ti sits in a tight cluster with these four rivals, all within roughly 3 percent of each other.

The Radeon 820M has no scores to compare, so its performance cannot be quantified from the recorded data. Its percentile of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, but without concrete benchmark numbers, that ranking carries limited analytical weight. The gap between the two products is defined by the RTX 5070 Ti's measured results and the Radeon 820M's absence of data.

The Verdict

The data points to two entirely different product categories. The RTX 5070 Ti is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with a 300 W TDP, 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 820M is an integrated graphics processor with 15 W TDP, system-shared memory, and system-dependent bandwidth. These are not competing products in the conventional sense.

Buyers seeking measured performance should look at the RTX 5070 Ti. Its benchmark scores place it at the 86th percentile, with an average score of 49957. The nearest rival deltas show it trading blows with the RX Vega 64, Arc A550M, RX 6900 XT, and RX 6800 XT. The RTX 5070 Ti also carries a launch MSRP of 749 USD, a figure that reflects its discrete card positioning.

The Radeon 820M suits systems where integrated graphics are the only option. Its 4 nm process node and RDNA 3.5 architecture suggest modern design, but the database shows no benchmark results to confirm actual performance. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder rather than a measured outcome. Users who need a dedicated GPU for gaming or compute workloads have only one data-backed choice here.

The RTX 5070 Ti's predecessor is GeForce 40, and its successor is GeForce 60. The Radeon 820M's predecessor is Navi II IGP. Both are currently listed as Active in production status. Release dates differ by nine days, with the RTX 5070 Ti launching on 2025-02-19 and the Radeon 820M on 2025-02-28.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti averages 49957. The RX Vega 64 scores 50001, 0.1 percent higher. The Arc A550M scores 49737, 0.4 percent lower. The RX 6900 XT scores 50951, 2 percent higher. The RX 6800 XT scores 48477, 3.1 percent lower.

Q: What is the highest recorded benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Geekbench Vulkan test shows 225122, the highest of its ten recorded results. Geekbench OpenCL follows at 212363, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 records 6604.

Q: Does the Radeon 820M have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Radeon 820M. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile of 50 is not derived from any measured test.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 820M uses system-shared memory with system-shared bus width and system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP and requires a 700 W suggested PSU. The Radeon 820M has a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti records 235.4 GPixel/s, while the Radeon 820M records 11.20 GPixel/s. The RTX 5070 Ti also leads in texture rate at 686.6 GTexel/s versus 22.40 GTexel/s.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip on a 5 nm process, while the Radeon 820M uses the Krackan Point 2 chip on a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC. Transistor counts differ sharply: the RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, while the Radeon 820M lists transistor count and die size as unknown. Transistor density for the RTX 5070 Ti is 120.6M per mm².

Clock speeds show a large gap. The Radeon 820M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well: the Radeon 820M uses system-shared memory, while the RTX 5070 Ti runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective.

Compute resources favor the RTX 5070 Ti overwhelmingly. It has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Radeon 820M has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 2 RT cores. Tensor cores are listed as null for the Radeon 820M.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences. The RTX 5070 Ti reaches 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. The Radeon 820M reaches 11.20 GPixel/s and 22.40 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti versus 716.8 GFLOPS for the Radeon 820M. FP16 ratios are 1:1 for both.

Physical characteristics differ. The RTX 5070 Ti is dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide. It uses a 16-pin power connector. The Radeon 820M is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and no listed dimensions. Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 Ti, PCIe 4.0 x8 for the Radeon 820M. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5070 Ti, while the Radeon 820M lists portable device dependent outputs.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon 820M has no launch MSRP; the RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3.5 architecture and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The RTX 5070 Ti uses Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50 generation. Process nodes differ: 4 nm for the AMD part, 5 nm for the NVIDIA part. Both come from TSMC.

Core organization reflects their different roles. The Radeon 820M carries 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. Its 2 RT cores provide ray tracing capability but at a much smaller scale. The RTX 5070 Ti carries 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The tensor core count is a significant architectural difference, as the Radeon 820M has none listed.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The Radeon 820M relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, a typical integrated graphics design. The RTX 5070 Ti uses dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. This dedicated memory enables the RTX 5070 Ti's high pixel and texture rates.

The Radeon 820M's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 716.8 GFLOPS, a 1:1 ratio. The RTX 5070 Ti also runs FP16 at 1:1, reaching 43.94 TFLOPS. Both support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Ti adds tensor cores for AI workloads, a feature absent from the Radeon 820M's specification list.

Power architecture differs as well. The Radeon 820M operates at 15 W with no power connectors, fitting an integrated design. The RTX 5070 Ti operates at 300 W, requires a 16-pin connector, and suggests a 700 W PSU. These power figures align with the performance gap.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measured category. Its benchmark scores cover compute, graphics, and legacy DirectX tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 225122 and OpenCL score of 212363 demonstrate strong compute throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6604 shows DirectX 12 rendering capability. PassMark G3D at 32974 and GPU Compute at 20203 confirm broad workload coverage.

The RTX 5070 Ti also wins on memory bandwidth, with 896.0 GB/s versus the Radeon 820M's system-dependent bandwidth. Its 16 GB GDDR7 capacity far exceeds the system-shared memory of the Radeon 820M. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores give it dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI tasks. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is orders of magnitude above the Radeon 820M's 716.8 GFLOPS.

The Radeon 820M wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 15 W TDP is far lower than the RTX 5070 Ti's 300 W. It requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU. Its 4 nm process node is smaller than the 5 nm node of the RTX 5070 Ti. As an IGP, it occupies no slot space and uses portable device dependent display outputs, fitting into thin and light systems.

The Radeon 820M also wins on release timing, launching on 2025-02-28, nine days after the RTX 5070 Ti's 2025-02-19 launch. Its predecessor is Navi II IGP, while the RTX 5070 Ti's predecessor is GeForce 40. The RTX 5070 Ti has a successor listed as GeForce 60, while the Radeon 820M has none.

For use cases, the RTX 5070 Ti suits desktop systems with room for a dual-slot, 304 mm card. It handles high-resolution gaming, compute workloads, and AI inference, backed by its 86th percentile ranking. The Radeon 820M suits portable devices where integrated graphics are mandatory. Its 15 W power draw and system-shared memory align with battery-powered systems. The data does not support any other conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti dominates measured performance, while the Radeon 820M offers only efficiency and integration advantages.