AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the two products being compared in this database entry?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M is an integrated graphics processor based on RDNA 3.5 architecture, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a discrete add-in board based on Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size of each chip?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The AMD Radeon 820M's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 820M uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each?

A: The Radeon 820M has a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP, requires a 16-pin connector, and the database suggests a 600 W power supply.

Q: What are the production statuses of the two products?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M is listed as Active with a release date of 2025-02-28. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is listed as End-of-life, released on 2024-01-23, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

Q: What percentile ranking does each hold in the database?

A: The Radeon 820M sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks at the 76th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER dominates every benchmark category where recorded data exists. Its PassMark G3D score is 31,811, compared to the Radeon 820M's lack of any benchmark entries in the database. The NVIDIA card also delivers a PassMark GPU Compute score of 18,372, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 199,267, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 53,683. In DirectX workloads, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER records PassMark DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores of 360, 181, 278, and 119 respectively. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,569.

The AMD Radeon 820M has no recorded benchmark scores in this database, which means the data cannot demonstrate any performance win for the integrated part. The wins column shows 0 for the Radeon 820M and 0 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in head-to-head comparisons, but the complete absence of benchmark data for the AMD part makes any direct comparison one-sided.

The use-case split follows the hardware design. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot discrete card with dedicated GDDR6X memory, intended for high-throughput rendering and compute tasks. The Radeon 820M is an IGP with system shared memory, a 15 W TDP, and no power connectors, positioned for portable devices where the display outputs are device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The two products come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3.5, built on TSMC's 4 nm process, and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, built on TSMC's 5 nm process, and belongs to the GeForce 40 series.

The Radeon 820M contains 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 ROPs. It includes 2 ray tracing cores but has no tensor cores listed. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER contains 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It includes 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part also carries the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The AMD part's transistor count and die size are unknown in the database.

Pixel and texture throughput show the scale difference. The Radeon 820M delivers 11.20 GPixel/s and 22.40 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s. Floating point performance follows the same pattern: the AMD part reaches 716.8 GFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, while the NVIDIA part reaches 44.10 TFLOPS for both.

Both architectures support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads, a feature the Radeon 820M lacks entirely according to the database. The NVIDIA part is also a discrete solution, whereas the AMD part is an integrated processor with no slot width beyond IGP designation.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ substantially. The Radeon 820M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. Memory clocks are even more divergent: the AMD part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA part uses 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

Memory capacity and type separate the two clearly. The Radeon 820M has no dedicated memory, relying on system shared resources for size, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

The bus interface differs as well. The Radeon 820M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Physical dimensions are only listed for the NVIDIA part: 310 mm length, 140 mm height, and 61 mm width, occupying a triple-slot form factor. The AMD part is an IGP with no listed dimensions.

Power delivery separates the two products completely. The Radeon 820M operates at 15 W with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER operates at 285 W with a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 600 W power supply. Display outputs also differ: the AMD part is portable device dependent, while the NVIDIA part offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The Radeon 820M has no launch MSRP in the database. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 799 USD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, and the Radeon 820M has no benchmark scores at all. The only recorded benchmark data belongs to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score is 31,087, placing it at the 76th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 with an average score of 31,206 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q with 31,220 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell with 31,532 (1.4% higher), and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX with 31,676 (1.9% higher). This places the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER slightly below four comparable workstation and prosumer cards, with deltas ranging from -0.4% to -1.9%.

Individual benchmark results for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER show its strongest showing in Geekbench OpenCL at 199,267 points. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 53,683. PassMark G3D is 31,811, and PassMark GPU Compute is 18,372. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,569. Legacy DirectX tests in PassMark produce scores of 360 for DirectX 9, 181 for DirectX 10, 278 for DirectX 11, and 119 for DirectX 12. The PassMark G2D score is 1,225.

The Radeon 820M's 50th percentile ranking reflects its position among all GPUs, but with no benchmark scores recorded, the database cannot quantify its performance against the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The wins columns show 0 for both sides in head-to-head tests simply because no such tests exist in the recorded data.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive performance gap between these two products. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 250.6 GPixel/s of pixel throughput, and 689.0 GTexel/s of texture throughput. The Radeon 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS, 11.20 GPixel/s, and 22.40 GTexel/s. Every recorded metric places the NVIDIA card in a different performance class.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two with benchmark data, and that data shows a card operating at the 76th percentile with an average score of 31,087. Its closest rivals in the database are all within 1.9% of its average score, indicating it sits in a competitive band of high-end cards. The Radeon 820M's 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs, but without scores, the database cannot confirm its practical performance level.

Architecture differences reinforce the performance split. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores, making it suitable for ray-traced workloads and AI-accelerated compute. The Radeon 820M has 2 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card also has dedicated GDDR6X memory with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD part depends on system shared memory with bandwidth that varies by system.

Power and form factor tell the rest of the story. The Radeon 820M is a 15 W IGP with no power connectors, designed for portable devices where the display outputs are device dependent. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a 285 W triple-slot card requiring a 16-pin connector and a 600 W power supply, with a 310 mm length and 140 mm height. The AMD part is active and newly released as of 2025-02-28. The NVIDIA part is end-of-life, released on 2024-01-23, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

Those selecting a GPU should follow the recorded data. The Radeon 820M serves as an integrated solution for low-power portable systems, where its 15 W TDP and system shared memory are the defining characteristics. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER serves high-end desktop workloads requiring dedicated memory, high compute throughput, and ray tracing capability. The database contains no evidence that the Radeon 820M can compete with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on any performance metric. The choice reduces to platform fit: a power-efficient IGP for mobile devices versus a high-performance discrete card for desktop systems.