AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 820M

CORE STATE Krackan Point 2
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2800 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1890 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
N/A
89,420
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
89,569
passmark_directx_10
N/A
107
passmark_directx_11
N/A
157
passmark_directx_12
N/A
73
passmark_directx_9
N/A
216
passmark_g2d
N/A
730
passmark_g3d
N/A
17,469
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
6,816

Analysis: AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark performance disparity between the AMD Radeon 820M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The database contains a full benchmark suite for the RTX 4060 Mobile, while the Radeon 820M has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence is itself informative: the RTX 4060 Mobile holds a 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, while the Radeon 820M sits at the 50th percentile.

Looking at the NVIDIA part's results, the strongest showing comes from the Geekbench Vulkan test, where it scores 89,569. The Geekbench OpenCL result is nearly identical at 89,420. These two numbers confirm that the RTX 4060 Mobile delivers consistent compute performance across different API workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 17,469 further supports this, as it represents a full 3D graphics workload rather than a synthetic compute test.

The RTX 4060 Mobile's Passmark GPU Compute score of 6,816 demonstrates that general-purpose compute tasks run at a substantially lower level than graphics workloads. The DirectX 11 Passmark score of 157 and DirectX 9 score of 216 both outpace the DirectX 12 score of 73, which suggests the architecture handles older API paths with relatively higher throughput. The DirectX 10 score of 107 sits between these values.

The Passmark G2D score of 730 shows 2D desktop and GUI acceleration performance. This is a separate metric from the 3D and compute numbers, and it indicates that the card handles basic display tasks without issue.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs with fundamentally different performance envelopes. The RTX 4060 Mobile delivers 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Radeon 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS. That is a 16.2 times difference in raw floating-point compute. The texture rate tells the same story: 181.4 GTexel/s versus 22.40 GTexel/s, an 8.1 times gap. Pixel rate shows 90.72 GPixel/s versus 11.20 GPixel/s, a difference of 8.1 times.

The RTX 4060 Mobile compares closely with several desktop and mobile parts in the database. Its average benchmark score of 22,729 sits within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, 0.8% above the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, and 1.3% above the Intel Arc B580. This places the RTX 4060 Mobile in a well-populated performance tier.

The Radeon 820M is an integrated graphics processor with 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The RTX 4060 Mobile, by contrast, has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The NVIDIA part has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, while the AMD part has 2 RT cores and no tensor cores. These are different classes of hardware.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 820M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It is part of the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile, with a chip designated Krackan Point 2. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with the AD107 chip and a transistor count of 18,900 million on a 159 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 118.9M per mm².

The AMD part has no dedicated memory. It uses system shared memory, with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Mobile's memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The AMD part runs at a 400 MHz base and 2800 MHz boost. The NVIDIA part runs at 1545 MHz base and 1890 MHz boost. The RTX 4060 Mobile's lower boost clock is offset by its much larger execution resource pool. Power draw reflects this: the Radeon 820M has a 15 W TDP, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has a 115 W TDP. Neither requires external power connectors, and both are classified as IGP slot width, meaning they are not discrete expansion cards.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Display outputs are portable device dependent for both. The Radeon 820M supports FP16 at 716.8 GFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, and the RTX 4060 Mobile supports FP16 at 11.61 TFLOPS, also 1:1.

The Radeon 820M's predecessor is listed as Navi II IGP, and its release date is February 28, 2025. The RTX 4060 Mobile's predecessor is GeForce 30 Mobile, its successor is GeForce 50 Mobile, and its release date is January 2, 2023. Both parts are currently listed as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has 3,072 shading units, while the AMD Radeon 820M has 128.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 820M uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile delivers 11.61 TFLOPS, and the Radeon 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The RTX 4060 Mobile has 24 RT cores, and the Radeon 820M has 2 RT cores.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Radeon 820M has a 15 W TDP, and the RTX 4060 Mobile has a 115 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: Only the RTX 4060 Mobile has tensor cores, with 96 of them. The Radeon 820M lists no tensor cores.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins in every measurable performance category where a direct comparison is possible. Its 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs give it overwhelming advantages in pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32 compute. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides dedicated high-speed storage for frame buffers and textures, which is critical for modern game rendering.

The Radeon 820M's advantages are of a different nature. Its 15 W TDP means it draws 100 W less than the RTX 4060 Mobile. It is an integrated processor with no power connectors, designed for portable devices where battery life and thermal limits take priority. Its 4 nm process node is smaller than the RTX 4060 Mobile's 5 nm node, which contributes to its efficiency profile.

In terms of release timing, the Radeon 820M is the newer part, released in February 2025 versus January 2023 for the RTX 4060 Mobile. The Radeon 820M's generation is listed as Navi III IGP for Strix Point Mobile, while the RTX 4060 Mobile belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation.

For users who need maximum graphics throughput, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the only viable option based on the data. Its average benchmark score of 22,729 places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within a narrow 1.3% band. The Radeon 820M has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals in the database, which means its real-world performance cannot be quantified with the available data.

For users who prioritize low power consumption in a portable device, the Radeon 820M's 15 W TDP and integrated design present a clear efficiency advantage. The RTX 4060 Mobile's 115 W TDP requires substantially more thermal headroom and battery capacity.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 820M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Chip | Krackan Point 2 | AD107 |

| Transistors | unknown | 18,900 million |

| Die size | unknown | 159 mm² |

| Base clock | 400 MHz | 1545 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2800 MHz | 1890 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 128 | 3072 |

| TMUs | 8 | 96 |

| ROPs | 4 | 48 |

| RT cores | 2 | 24 |

| Tensor cores | None | 96 |

| Pixel rate | 11.20 GPixel/s | 90.72 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 22.40 GTexel/s | 181.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 716.8 GFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 716.8 GFLOPS (1:1) | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 115 W |

| Release date | 2025-02-28 | 2023-01-02 |

| Predecessor | Navi II IGP | GeForce 30 Mobile |

| Successor | None | GeForce 50 Mobile |

| Percentile | 50 | 67 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 22,729 |

The two GPUs share identical API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use PCIe 4.0 x8 and have no power connectors. Both are listed as IGP slot width with portable device dependent display outputs. The RTX 4060 Mobile's transistor density is 118.9M per mm², and its memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. The Radeon 820M's memory clock is system shared with no fixed value.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
820M
RTX 4060 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
128
3,072 +2300.0%
Shaders
128
3,072 +2300.0%
TMUs
8
96 +1100.0%
ROPs
4
48 +1100.0%
Compute Units
2
—
SM Count
—
24
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
2800 MHz
1890 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
256.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
1024 KB
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
90.72 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
181.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
716.8 GFLOPS
11.61 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
44.80 GFLOPS (1:16)
181.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
716.8 GFLOPS (1:1)
11.61 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
2
24 +1100.0%
Tensor Cores
—
96
Power
TDP
15 W
115 W
TDP (W)
15
115 +666.7%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Krackan Point 2
AD107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
18,900 million
Die Size
unknown
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
—
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
—
GeForce 50 Mobile
View Radeon 820M Details View GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Details