AMD Radeon 820M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the AMD Radeon 820M or the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350. With an average benchmark score of 0 for both parts and no entries in the head-to-head benchmark table, there is no measured performance data to compare directly. Both GPUs sit at the 50th percentile in the database's distribution of all GPUs, though this percentile reflects their position in the catalog rather than any computed performance ranking.

The absence of benchmark data means the comparison must rely on architectural characteristics and theoretical throughput figures recorded in the database. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the AMD Radeon 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS. That puts the Intel part at approximately 62 times the raw FP32 throughput of the AMD part. Texture rate follows a similar pattern: the Intel GPU reaches 1,388.8 GTexel/s against 22.40 GTexel/s for the AMD GPU, a ratio of roughly 62 to 1.

Pixel rate inverts this relationship. The AMD Radeon 820M produces 11.20 GPixel/s, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 records 0 MPixel/s. This reflects a fundamental difference in the two products' rendering pipelines, as the Intel accelerator has no ROPs at all. The AMD part's 4 ROPs deliver measurable pixel throughput, whereas the Intel part's pixel rate is recorded as zero.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families and target entirely different segments. The AMD Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3.5 architecture and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point mobile platforms. The chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses Generation 12.5 architecture and belongs to the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation. Intel fabricates this chip on its own 10 nm process.

The Intel part is a massive device. The database records 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, with a transistor density of 78.1M per mm². The AMD part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no direct density comparison is possible. The process node difference is notable: TSMC's 4 nm process for AMD versus Intel's 10 nm process for the data center part.

Shader resources differ by two orders of magnitude. The Intel GPU has 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, and 112 ray tracing cores. The AMD GPU has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 2 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has no ROPs, while the AMD part has 4. Clock behavior also differs substantially. The AMD Radeon 820M runs at a 400 MHz base clock and 2800 MHz boost clock. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 runs at a 750 MHz base clock and 1550 MHz boost clock, with its HBM2e memory clocked at 1200 MHz or 2.4 Gbps effective.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The AMD part uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. The Intel part carries 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. The bus interface also differs: the AMD GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

API support shows several differences. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan support is not recorded in the database. The Intel part has no display outputs, while the AMD part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins decisively in raw compute throughput. Its 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 and 44.44 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) figures dwarf the AMD part's 716.8 GFLOPS in both precision formats. Texture throughput is also overwhelmingly in Intel's favor: 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 22.40 GTexel/s. The Intel part's 96 GB of HBM2e memory with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth provides a memory subsystem that the system-shared AMD part cannot match, especially since the AMD part's bandwidth is system dependent rather than fixed.

The AMD Radeon 820M wins in the areas that matter for integrated graphics in mobile platforms. Its 11.20 GPixel/s pixel rate, delivered by 4 ROPs, is the only recorded pixel throughput in this comparison since the Intel part manages 0 MPixel/s. The AMD part also wins on power envelope: its 15 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Intel part's 450 W TDP. The AMD part is an IGP with no power connectors and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the Intel part is an OAM module with a suggested 850 W power supply and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which is a higher feature level than the Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1) support. Vulkan 1.4 support is recorded for the AMD part, while the Intel part has no Vulkan entry in the database. The AMD part also has display outputs, whereas the Intel part has none.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 820M | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Generation 12.5 |

| Generation | Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile) | Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Transistors | Unknown | 100,000 million |

| Die size | Unknown | 1280 mm² |

| Transistor density | Not recorded | 78.1M / mm² |

| Base clock | 400 MHz | 750 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2800 MHz | 1550 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 96 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | HBM2e |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 8192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 2.46 TB/s |

| Shading units | 128 | 14,336 |

| TMUs | 8 | 896 |

| ROPs | 4 | 0 |

| Ray tracing cores | 2 | 112 |

| Pixel rate | 11.20 GPixel/s | 0 MPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 22.40 GTexel/s | 1,388.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 716.8 GFLOPS | 44.44 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 716.8 GFLOPS (1:1) | 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 450 W |

| Slot width | IGP | OAM Module |

| Power connectors | None | Not recorded |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 850 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | Not recorded |

| Release date | 2025-02-28 | 2023-01-09 |

| Production status | Active | Active |

| Predecessor | Navi II IGP | Not recorded |

| Successor | Not recorded | H3C Graphics |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 14,336 shading units. The AMD Radeon 820M has 128 shading units.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the AMD Radeon 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS. The Intel part provides approximately 62 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The AMD Radeon 820M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 96 GB of HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon 820M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of each part?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M has a 15 W TDP and no power connectors. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has a 450 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 850 W.

Q: Which GPU has pixel rendering capability?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M has 4 ROPs and a pixel rate of 11.20 GPixel/s. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 0 ROPs and a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s.

Q: When was each GPU released?

A: The AMD Radeon 820M was released on 2025-02-28. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 was released on 2023-01-09. Both parts remain in active production.