AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Arc B570 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Arc B570 is the only one of the two parts with recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct score-to-score comparisons for the AMD Radeon 8065S are not possible from the recorded data. The Arc B570 carries an average benchmark score of 20,556 across its tested workloads, placing it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20,534, which is 0.1% behind. The Intel Arc A750 sits at 20,582, a 0.1% margin in favor of the A750. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X posts 20,662, which is 0.5% ahead of the Arc B570.

The Arc B570's strongest individual results come from compute-oriented tests. In Geekbench Vulkan it records 96,844 points, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 83,514. Passmark G3D returns 14,195, and Passmark GPU Compute lands at 7,281. The older DirectX API tests show lower figures: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 164, DirectX 11 scores 118, DirectX 10 scores 65, and DirectX 12 scores 72. The 2D workload score is 661.

The AMD Radeon 8065S has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile rank is 50, which places it at the median position among all GPUs, but that rank is not supported by any measured workload data. The absence of scores means the head-to-head comparison is structurally one-sided: the Intel part has a full record of results, while the AMD part has none. The Arc B570's 65th percentile and 20,556 average score stand as the only measured performance reference point in this pairing.

The Arc B570's 0.1% lead over the RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% deficit against the Arc A750 indicate that its measured performance is tightly clustered with those two GPUs. The 0.4% gap to the Quadro M4000M and the 0.5% gap to the R9 M390X show that the recorded scores fall within a narrow band of roughly one percentage point across all four nearest rivals. The data suggests the Arc B570 is a mid-pack performer relative to its closest competitors, with no single rival separating itself by more than half a percentage point.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8065S have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks, no average score, and no nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon 8065S. Its percentile rank of 50 is not tied to any measured workload.

Q: What is the Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20,556 and sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile?

A: The RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc B570's 20,556.

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS. The AMD part leads by 3.84 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses System Shared memory with a System Dependent bandwidth. The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S boosts to 3000 MHz. The Intel Arc B570 has a fixed clock of 2500 MHz for both base and boost.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectures, process nodes, and chip designs. The AMD Radeon 8065S is built on RDNA 3.5 and uses the Gorgon Halo chip, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The Intel Arc B570 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip, part of the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation.

The manufacturing process differs by one node step. The AMD part is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The Intel chip has a published transistor count of 19,600 million and a die size of 272 mm², giving a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The AMD chip has a larger die at 308 mm², but its transistor count and density are listed as unknown in the database. The Intel die is 36 mm² smaller than the AMD die.

The shading and compute resources are distributed differently. The AMD Radeon 8065S has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc B570 has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 18 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has 256 more shading units, 16 more TMUs, and 22 more ray tracing cores, but the Intel part has 16 more ROPs.

The FP16 capability reveals a difference in compute philosophy. The AMD part delivers FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, both at 15.36 TFLOPS. The Intel part runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, producing 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 against 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32. Intel's architecture doubles the FP16 throughput relative to FP32, while AMD's keeps them equal.

Both parts support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The interface and display output configurations differ. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has display outputs described as Portable Device Dependent. The Intel Arc B570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon 8065S and Intel Arc B570 differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The process node is the first split: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 5 nm. The die size differs, with AMD at 308 mm² and Intel at 272 mm². Transistor data is only available for Intel, at 19,600 million and 72.1M per mm².

Clock behavior is fundamentally different. The AMD part has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, a 1705 MHz range between the two. The Intel part has a fixed 2500 MHz clock for both base and boost, meaning no boost variance at all. Memory clocks also diverge: AMD uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth, while Intel uses 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Memory capacity, type, and bus width are all Intel-only specifics. The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 8065S has no dedicated memory; its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all tied to the system.

The compute pipeline numbers differ in both directions. AMD leads in shading units (2,560 vs 2,304), TMUs (160 vs 144), and ray tracing cores (40 vs 18). Intel leads in ROPs (80 vs 64). Pixel rate favors Intel at 200.0 GPixel/s versus AMD's 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate favors AMD at 480.0 GTexel/s versus Intel's 360.0 GTexel/s. FP32 favors AMD at 15.36 TFLOPS versus 11.52 TFLOPS, while FP16 favors Intel at 23.04 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS.

Power and physical design are strongly divergent. The AMD Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W, is an integrated graphics processor with IGP slot width, and has no power connectors. The Intel Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W, is a dual-slot card, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The Intel card measures 272 mm in length (10.7 inches) and 115 mm in height (4.5 inches), while the AMD part has no recorded dimensions.

The bus interface differs as well: AMD uses PCIe 5.0 x16, Intel uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Release dates are separated by roughly one year. The Intel Arc B570 launched on 2025-01-15, while the AMD Radeon 8065S has a release date of 2025-12-31. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of 219 USD. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one measurable verdict: the Intel Arc B570 is the only one of these two GPUs with actual performance results in the database. Its 20,556 average score, 65th percentile rank, and tight clustering with rivals like the RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% behind) and the Arc A750 (0.1% ahead) define its position. The AMD Radeon 8065S has no scores, no rivals, and no average, so any performance-based selection between the two must default to the Intel part.

For users who need a discrete, installable card with dedicated memory, the Arc B570 is the clear choice from the data. It has 10 GB of GDDR6, 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a dual-slot form factor, and a 150 W TDP with a single 8-pin connector. Its fixed 2500 MHz clock simplifies power behavior, and its 80 ROPs and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate provide the highest rasterization throughput of the pair.

The AMD Radeon 8065S is an integrated GPU with a 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and system-dependent memory. Its advantages in the specification sheet are real: a 3000 MHz boost clock, 15.36 TFLOPS of FP32, 40 ray tracing cores, a 4 nm process, and PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity. Those figures suggest it is designed for a portable, power-constrained device where the CPU and GPU share memory. The absence of any benchmark record means its actual performance cannot be verified against the Arc B570's measured results.

The choice depends on the use case, strictly from the data. A system builder looking for a standalone graphics card with proven scores should pick the Intel Arc B570. A laptop or compact device integrator needing a low-power integrated solution with a high boost clock and more shading units would choose the AMD Radeon 8065S, accepting that its performance is unmeasured in the database. The Intel part has the measured record and the higher percentile; the AMD part has the more modern process node and the higher theoretical compute throughput.