AMD Radeon 8065S vs AMD Radeon PRO V710 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon 8065S versus the AMD Radeon PRO V710. The Radeon 8065S has no benchmark scores listed, while the Radeon PRO V710 has two recorded results. This absence of shared test data means direct performance comparisons must be derived from the Radeon PRO V710's scores and the Radeon 8065S's computed specifications rather than matched test runs.

The Radeon PRO V710 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460. Its average benchmark score across recorded tests is 58,657, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Radeon 8065S shows a 50th percentile standing with an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the lack of recorded test results rather than a measured performance level.

The Radeon PRO V710's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA P102-100 sits 0.2% behind with an average score of 58,528. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT trails by 0.5% at 58,392. The Intel Arc A570M follows at 0.7% behind with 58,239, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM rounds out the group at 1.0% behind with 58,085. These narrow margins show the Radeon PRO V710 clustered tightly with its closest competitors, all within a single percentage point.

For the Radeon 8065S, the absence of benchmark data means its performance profile must be inferred from its architectural parameters. It lists 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations pipelines, and 40 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 compute rate is 15.36 TFLOPS with a matching FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio. The texture fill rate reaches 480.0 GTexel/s and pixel throughput stands at 192.0 GPixel/s. These figures indicate a capable mobile-class part, though without recorded scores its real-world standing cannot be quantified against the Radeon PRO V710's measured results.

The Radeon PRO V710's FP32 output of 27.65 TFLOPS exceeds the Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS by a substantial margin. Texture fill on the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 432.0 GTexel/s, which is lower than the Radeon 8065S's 480.0 GTexel/s despite the former having more texture units. Both parts post identical pixel rates of 192.0 GPixel/s, a notable parity given their different shading unit counts and clock speeds.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated at TSMC on a 4 nm process node. Its die measures 308 mm². The Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, also from TSMC but on a 5 nm process node, with a die size of 346 mm² and 28,100 million transistors. The transistor density for the Navi 32 die is recorded at 81.2M per mm², while the Radeon 8065S's transistor count and density are listed as unknown.

The Radeon 8065S belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and carries a predecessor designation of Polaris Mobile. The Radeon PRO V710 belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation with a predecessor of Radeon Pro Vega. Its codename is recorded as Wheat Nas, while the Radeon 8065S has no codename listed. The release dates differ substantially: the Radeon PRO V710 appeared in October 2024, while the Radeon 8065S is dated to December 2025.

Clock behavior illustrates a major architectural divergence. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, a wide boost range that suggests aggressive power management for a mobile integrated graphics solution. The Radeon PRO V710 runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz and boost clock of 2000 MHz, a much narrower range that indicates sustained, steady operation under load. The Radeon 8065S's memory clock is listed as system shared, while the Radeon PRO V710 uses a fixed memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory architecture could not differ more starkly. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth, meaning its performance scales with the host platform's memory configuration. The Radeon PRO V710 carries 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement gives the Radeon PRO V710 a fixed and predictable memory throughput, whereas the Radeon 8065S's memory performance remains contingent on external factors.

Feature sets show common ground. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither lists tensor cores. The Radeon 8065S uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Radeon PRO V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Power delivery differs as well: the Radeon 8065S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and a 55 W TDP, while the Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot card requiring one 8-pin power connector, a 158 W TDP, and a suggested power supply of 450 W.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon PRO V710 wins decisively in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rate of 27.65 TFLOPS nearly doubles the Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS. It also holds a substantial lead in shading units with 3,456 versus 2,560, and in texture mapping units with 216 versus 160. Its ray tracing core count of 54 exceeds the Radeon 8065S's 40. The Radeon PRO V710's 96 raster operations pipelines outperform the Radeon 8065S's 64. These advantages position it for workloads that scale with shader count and memory bandwidth, particularly large compute tasks and professional rendering.

The Radeon 8065S wins in specific efficiency-oriented metrics. Its texture fill rate of 480.0 GTexel/s surpasses the Radeon PRO V710's 432.0 GTexel/s, an outcome driven by the 8065S's far higher boost clock of 3000 MHz versus 2000 MHz. Its power draw of 55 W versus 158 W represents a substantial efficiency gap, and its integrated nature with no power connectors makes it suitable for compact portable systems. The pixel rate matches at 192.0 GPixel/s for both, so neither gains an edge there.

The Radeon PRO V710's measured benchmark results confirm its standing. Its 88th percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average score of 58,657, places it in the upper tier of the database. Its nearest rivals all cluster within 1.0% of its average score, indicating tight competition at that performance level. The Radeon 8065S shows no recorded benchmark scores, so its competitive position remains undefined in the database.

Bus interface differences favor the Radeon 8065S on paper. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 connection provides double the data transfer capability of the Radeon PRO V710's PCIe 4.0 x16, though the practical impact depends on the rest of the system. Display outputs also differ: the Radeon 8065S's outputs are portable device dependent, while the Radeon PRO V710 lists no outputs at all, making it a compute-only card.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP and requires no power connectors as an integrated GPU. The Radeon PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP, requires one 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply.

Q: What is the Radeon PRO V710's benchmark standing?

A: It has an average benchmark score of 58,657 across its recorded tests, ranking at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its two recorded scores are 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: Which architecture does each GPU use?

A: The Radeon 8065S uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 308 mm² die. The Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm TSMC process with a 346 mm² die containing 28,100 million transistors.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | AMD Radeon PRO V710 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Die size | 308 mm² | 346 mm² |

| Transistors | unknown | 28,100 million |

| Base clock | 1295 MHz | 1900 MHz |

| Boost clock | 3000 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 28 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 224 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 504.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2560 | 3456 |

| TMUs | 160 | 216 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT cores | 40 | 54 |

| Texture rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 432.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.36 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 158 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 450 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| Release date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-10-02 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Radeon Pro Vega |

The Verdict

The database presents two GPUs with fundamentally different design goals. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a measured performer with concrete benchmark results. Its average score of 58,657 places it at the 88th percentile, and its nearest rivals all sit within one percentage point. It delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 28 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory at 504.0 GB/s, and a 158 W TDP in a single-slot form factor. This is a compute-oriented card with no display outputs, suited for workloads that need sustained throughput and predictable memory capacity.

The AMD Radeon 8065S is an integrated GPU with no recorded benchmark scores. Its 55 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and portable-device-dependent outputs mark it as a mobile part. Its boost clock reaches 3000 MHz, which drives a texture fill rate of 480.0 GTexel/s that exceeds the Radeon PRO V710 despite the latter having more texture units. Its FP32 output of 15.36 TFLOPS is lower, and its system-shared memory means performance varies with the host platform.

The choice between them depends entirely on use case. Systems requiring a discrete card with proven benchmark performance, large dedicated memory, and high compute throughput should use the Radeon PRO V710. Systems built around integrated graphics with minimal power draw and no separate card slot should use the Radeon 8065S. The Radeon PRO V710's measured data gives it a clear advantage in raw performance and memory capacity, while the Radeon 8065S offers a power-efficient integrated alternative whose actual performance remains unquantified in the database.