AMD Radeon 8060S vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for the AMD Radeon 8060S is recorded across three distinct tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Radeon 8060S posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80483. The LX PRO's average benchmark score is listed as 0, with no individual test results available, which places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The Radeon 8060S, by contrast, sits at the 87th percentile.

The Radeon 8060S achieves an average benchmark score of 55757. Its nearest rivals in the database show how competitive this figure is: the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a delta of just 0.1% ahead of the 8060S. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 scores 56083, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 1.7% with a score of 54828, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is 2.8% behind at 54247. These margins are narrow, indicating the 8060S performs in a tight cluster around the 55,700 to 56,100 range.

Since the LX PRO has no benchmark entries, there are no head-to-head wins recorded for either product. The data shows winsA and winsB both at 0. The absence of scores for the LX PRO means no direct comparison of performance metrics such as frame rates, compute scores, or graphics throughput can be established from the database. What can be stated is that the Radeon 8060S has verified results, while the LX PRO's performance profile remains unmeasured.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Radeon 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The die size is 308 mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture, produced on a 6 nm process also at TSMC, and is part of the 7G100 generation. Its die size is listed as unknown.

The memory subsystems are completely different. The 8060S uses system shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM size, type, or bus width specified; its bandwidth is system dependent. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, stated as 18 Gbps effective.

Compute resources show a notable split. The 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but its ray tracing core count is null in the database. The LX PRO's raw FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 14.85 TFLOPS for the 8060S. In FP16, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the 8060S matches its FP32 figure at 14.85 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rates are close: 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO and 185.6 GPixel/s for the 8060S. Texture rates differ, with the 8060S at 464.0 GTexel/s and the LX PRO at 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power characteristics diverge sharply. The 8060S has a TDP of 55 W, is an integrated graphics product (IGP) with no power connectors, and occupies a single slot width. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, suggests a 550 W power supply, and is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The 8060S uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs for the 8060S are portable device dependent, whereas the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

API support is nearly identical for DirectX and OpenGL: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 8060S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The release dates differ, with the 8060S released on 2025-01-05 and the LX PRO on 2026-03-16. The 8060S lists its predecessor as Polaris Mobile, while the LX PRO has no predecessor recorded.

The Verdict

The recorded data makes one conclusion unavoidable: the AMD Radeon 8060S is a measured, verified product with a substantial benchmark profile, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark results in the database. The 8060S holds an average score of 55757 and ranks at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The LX PRO ranks at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0. Any selection between these two must be based on the fact that one has demonstrated performance and the other has none recorded.

The 8060S is an integrated GPU with a 55 W TDP, designed for portable or compact systems where power draw and slot footprint matter. It delivers 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 and 40 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, a 16-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO's raw compute specifications are higher on paper, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm whether that translates into real-world performance advantages.

For users requiring verified graphics performance, the Radeon 8060S is the only option with data backing it. For users who prioritize dedicated memory capacity and higher theoretical throughput, the LX PRO has the specifications, but its lack of measured results means its actual capabilities are unknown. The release dates also matter: the 8060S arrived earlier and has an active production status, as does the LX PRO, but the LX PRO is newer.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every measurable specification category. The process node is 4 nm for the 8060S versus 6 nm for the LX PRO. The die size is 308 mm² for the 8060S, unknown for the LX PRO. The 8060S uses system shared memory; the LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6. The 8060S has no dedicated bus width, while the LX PRO has a 192-bit bus. Bandwidth is system dependent for the 8060S, versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX PRO. Memory clock for the LX PRO is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the 8060S has no memory clock specified.

Shading units: 2560 for the 8060S, 6144 for the LX PRO. TMUs: 160 versus 192. ROPs: 64 versus 96. Ray tracing cores: 40 for the 8060S, null for the LX PRO. FP32: 14.85 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate: 185.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 464.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. TDP: 55 W versus 225 W. Slot width: IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: not listed versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3. Dimensions: not listed for the 8060S, while the LX PRO measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 8060S?

A: The 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55757.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the LX PRO has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the Radeon 8060S compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in average score?

A: The 8060S scores 55757, which is 2.8% higher than the RTX 4080's score of 54247.

Q: What memory configuration does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO use?

A: The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8060S has a 55 W TDP, while the LX PRO has a 225 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, compared to 2560 for the Radeon 8060S.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 8060S wins in the only category that has measured data: benchmark performance. It has three recorded scores, an average of 55757, and an 87th percentile ranking. It also wins on power efficiency, with a 55 W TDP versus 225 W, and on interface generation, using PCIe 5.0 x16 against the LX PRO's PCIe 4.0 x16. Its texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s exceeds the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s. The 8060S also supports a newer Vulkan version, 1.4 versus 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw specification sheet comparisons. It has more shading units (6144 versus 2560), more TMUs (192 versus 160), more ROPs (96 versus 64), and higher FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 14.85 TFLOPS). Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is more than triple the 8060S's 14.85 TFLOPS. It provides 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the 8060S relies on system shared memory. The LX PRO also has a slightly higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 185.6 GPixel/s, and it offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the 8060S's outputs are portable device dependent.

The LX PRO's higher theoretical compute and dedicated memory make it suited for workloads that demand large memory pools and raw FP32 or FP16 throughput, assuming its unmeasured performance matches its specifications. The 8060S's verified scores and low power draw make it suited for systems where integrated graphics are required and where benchmark-validated performance is essential. The database shows no head-to-head wins for either product, so the split is between measured results and unverified specifications.