AMD Radeon 8060S vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon 8060S target different corners of the GPU market, yet both land within striking distance of each other in aggregate performance. The A60 is a workstation-focused discrete card built for professional reliability, while the 8060S is an integrated graphics solution for mobile platforms with aggressive clock speeds. Benchmark data shows the AMD part wins every head-to-head test, but the Intel card holds a slight edge in overall percentile ranking, creating a nuanced comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 8060S dominates the two shared benchmark tests with decisive margins. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 8060S scores 84,626 against the Arc Pro A60’s 63,485, a 25% difference in AMD’s favor. The Vulkan test shows an even wider gap: AMD scores 80,483 versus Intel’s 57,166, meaning the Radeon is 29% faster. These are substantial leads, not marginal wins, and they hold across both compute and graphics APIs.

The A60’s best showing comes in aggregate metrics rather than direct comparisons. Its average benchmark score of 60,326 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the 8060S averages 55,757 with an 87th percentile ranking. This creates an interesting paradox: the 8060S wins every head-to-head test yet has a lower average because its benchmark suite includes 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 2,162, which drags down its overall average. The A60’s two Geekbench results are more consistent, so its average stays higher.

Looking at nearest rivals adds context. The A60’s 60,326 average is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090’s 60,347, a 0% delta, meaning the Arc Pro A60 trades blows with NVIDIA’s flagship in this specific aggregate metric. It also sits 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and 2.5% below the Radeon Pro W6600M. The 8060S, meanwhile, matches the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB within 0.1%, sits 0.6% below the RTX 5080, and runs 2.8% ahead of the RTX 4080. These rival comparisons show both cards punching well above their respective classes.

The Vulkan result deserves special attention. AMD’s 29% lead in Vulkan suggests a significant architectural advantage in that API, likely tied to the 8060S’s higher shading unit count and clock speeds. In OpenCL, the 25% gap is slightly smaller but still commanding. The data shows no scenario where the A60 wins a direct benchmark, making the head-to-head entirely one-sided despite the Intel card’s stronger percentile standing.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84,626 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60’s 63,485, a 25% advantage for AMD.

Q: How much faster is the 8060S in Vulkan?

A: The 8060S achieves 80,483 points compared to 57,166 for the A60, making AMD 29% faster in this test.

Q: Which card has a higher aggregate benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 averages 60,326 across its tested workloads, while the 8060S averages 55,757. This puts the A60 in the 88th percentile versus 87th for AMD.

Q: How does each card compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090?

A: The A60’s average score of 60,326 is essentially tied with the RTX 4090’s 60,347 (0% delta). The 8060S does not list the RTX 4090 as a nearest rival.

Q: Does the 8060S have any benchmark results outside of Geekbench?

A: Yes, it has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162. The A60 has no 3DMark result in the data.

Q: What is the percentile ranking difference between the two?

A: The A60 sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, one point higher than the 8060S’s 87th percentile, despite losing every head-to-head test.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon 8060S is the clear performance winner in direct comparisons. Its 25% OpenCL lead and 29% Vulkan lead are too large to ignore, and it also offers higher raw compute metrics across the board. For users running OpenCL or Vulkan workloads, the 8060S delivers measurably better results. The data also shows the 8060S matching the RTX 5080 within 0.6% and beating the RTX 4080 by 2.8% in average score, which is remarkable for an integrated part.

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the choice for those who value consistency and professional positioning. Its average score is 8% higher than the 8060S, and it ties the RTX 4090 in aggregate performance. The A60 also holds a higher percentile ranking, suggesting it performs well across a broader range of workloads rather than excelling in specific tests. Its 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory provides predictable bandwidth, whereas the 8060S relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

The verdict depends on workload priorities. If raw compute in OpenCL or Vulkan is the primary concern, the 8060S wins decisively. If consistent aggregate performance and a higher percentile standing matter more, the A60 is the safer pick. The 8060S’s inclusion of a 3DMark result, where it scores 2,162, shows it can handle gaming workloads, but its average suffers from that lower score. The A60’s two benchmark results are both strong, which boosts its average but limits comparison breadth.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply on process technology and power. The Arc Pro A60 uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, while the 8060S uses a more advanced 4 nm TSMC process on a 308 mm² die with unknown transistor count. The A60 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, whereas the 8060S draws just 55 W and needs no power connectors. The A60 is a single-slot discrete card, while the 8060S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP).

Memory configuration differs fundamentally. The A60 features 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8060S uses system-shared memory with a system-shared bus width and system-dependent bandwidth, making its memory performance variable based on the host platform. Clock speeds also favor AMD: the 8060S boosts to 2900 MHz from a 1295 MHz base, while the A60 boosts to 2050 MHz from 900 MHz. The 8060S’s memory runs at system-shared speed, while the A60’s GDDR6 operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, while the 8060S packs 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. AMD also leads in ray tracing with 40 RT cores versus Intel’s 16. Pixel rate favors the 8060S at 185.6 GPixel/s versus 131.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s versus 262.4 GTexel/s. The 8060S provides PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity, while the A60 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ too: the A60 offers 4x DisplayPort 2.0, while the 8060S’s outputs are portable-device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is generational and philosophical. Intel’s Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist Pro Series generation. AMD’s 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip on RDNA 3.5 architecture, belonging to the Navi Mobile RX 8000M generation. This places Intel in a workstation-focused design lineage, while AMD targets high-end mobile integration.

Compute capability differs in structure. The A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning it can double FP16 throughput when available. The 8060S offers 14.85 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration path. This makes the AMD part stronger in FP32-heavy workloads but less flexible for mixed-precision tasks that benefit from boosted FP16.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The core count disparity is notable: AMD has 25% more shading units and 25% more TMUs, which directly explains its benchmark dominance. The 8060S’s 40 RT cores versus 16 on the A60 indicates a much stronger ray tracing capability, though no ray tracing benchmark exists in the data to quantify it. The A60’s transistor density is 42.8M per mm², while the 8060S’s density is unknown due to its undisclosed transistor count.

The 8060S’s predecessor is Polaris Mobile, showing AMD’s mobile lineage, while the A60 has no listed predecessor. Release dates differ by roughly 19 months, with the A60 launching in June 2023 and the 8060S in January 2025. Neither card lists a launch MSRP, so pricing cannot be compared. Both remain in active production status. The architectural takeaways are clear: Intel emphasizes dedicated memory and professional stability, while AMD pushes higher clocks, more compute units, and integrated efficiency.