AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

AMD Radeon 8060S and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE are two very different approaches to the same AMD graphics architecture family. The 8060S is a mobile-focused integrated graphics processor (IGP) built into the Strix Halo chip, while the RX 7650 GRE is a discrete, dual-slot add-in card from the Radeon RX 7000 series. Benchmark data shows they trade wins, but their design philosophies could not be more distinct. This analysis breaks down what each card offers based strictly on recorded measurements and specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has a higher average benchmark score of 55757, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE averages 42723. The 8060S sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 83rd percentile for the RX 7650 GRE.

Q: How do they compare in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins this test with a score of 2336, beating the 8060S score of 2162. This represents a 7.4% advantage for the RX 7650 GRE in this specific DirectX 12 workload.

Q: Which card performs better in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S edges out the RX 7650 GRE with a score of 84626 versus 83109, a 1.8% difference. This is a narrow win in general compute performance.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has a 55 W TDP and requires no power connectors as an integrated part. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a 170 W TDP and needs a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 450 W.

Q: Are there architectural differences between the two?

A: Yes. The 8060S uses RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm process with a 308 mm² die, while the RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm process with a 204 mm² die. The 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 40 RT cores, versus 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 RT cores for the RX 7650 GRE.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The 8060S uses system-shared memory, meaning size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-dependent. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The foundational difference is the manufacturing process. The 8060S is built on a 4 nm node at TSMC, while the RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm node, also at TSMC. This smaller process for the 8060S allows for a larger die at 308 mm² compared to 204 mm² for the RX 7650 GRE, despite the latter having a disclosed transistor count of 13,300 million and a density of 65.2M per mm². The 8060S transistor count is listed as unknown.

Architecturally, the 8060S runs RDNA 3.5, a newer iteration than the RDNA 3.0 found in the RX 7650 GRE. This generation difference is reflected in the core counts. The 8060S packs 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 RT cores. Both have 64 ROPs, so pixel output capability is structurally similar but clock-dependent.

Clock speeds show a different strategy. The 8060S has a lower base clock of 1295 MHz but boosts to 2900 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost of 2695 MHz. This means the 8060S relies on a high boost ceiling to extract performance, while the RX 7650 GRE runs more consistently at mid-range clocks.

Memory architecture is the starkest split. The 8060S has no dedicated VRAM; it shares system memory, with bandwidth described as system-dependent. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. This makes the RX 7650 GRE far more predictable in memory-heavy workloads.

The 8060S is an integrated part (IGP) with a 55 W TDP, no slot width, no power connectors, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card, 204 mm long and 115 mm tall, with one 8-pin connector, a 170 W TDP, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Display outputs also differ: the 8060S is portable-device dependent, while the RX 7650 GRE offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

The RX 7650 GRE has a known predecessor (Navi II) and successor (Navi IV), while the 8060S lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear case for each card depending on the use case. The AMD Radeon 8060S is the better overall performer based on average benchmark score. Its 55757 average puts it 30.5% ahead of the RX 7650 GRE's 42723. It also sits higher in the percentile ranking at 87 versus 83. However, this advantage is not universal.

In the specific 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 7650 GRE wins decisively with a 7.4% margin. This indicates that for pure gaming-style DirectX 12 workloads, the discrete card with dedicated memory holds an edge. The 8060S counters with a 1.8% win in Geekbench OpenCL, showing slightly better general compute throughput.

The power envelope is a major differentiator. The 8060S at 55 W is a fraction of the 170 W TDP of the RX 7650 GRE. For a laptop or compact system where power and heat are constrained, the 8060S is the only viable choice given its integrated nature. For a desktop with a 450 W power supply and space for a dual-slot card, the RX 7650 GRE offers better DX12 gaming performance.

The RX 7650 GRE also has a fixed memory advantage. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is predictable and sufficient for many titles. The 8060S relies on system RAM, which can vary wildly in performance. In a best-case scenario with fast shared memory, the 8060S could perform admirably, but it cannot match the dedicated bandwidth of the RX 7650 GRE in memory-intensive scenarios.

The choice is straightforward: the 8060S is for integrated, low-power systems where average compute performance matters more than peak gaming. The RX 7650 GRE is for discrete builds where dedicated VRAM and DX12 gaming performance are priorities, accepting higher power draw and a physical card footprint.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8060S | AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 13,300 million |

| Transistor Density | Not listed | 65.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz | 2695 MHz |

| Game Clock | Not listed | 2350 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 160 | 128 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 40 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 185.6 GPixel/s | 172.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 464.0 GTexel/s | 345.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 14.85 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1) | 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 170 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Length | Not listed | 204 mm |

| Height | Not listed | 115 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2025-02-06 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 279 USD |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a split decision. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 2336 against the 8060S score of 2162. The RX 7650 GRE wins by 7.4%. This is a meaningful gap in a modern DirectX 12 workload, indicating that the dedicated memory and higher clocked memory of the RX 7650 GRE provide a tangible benefit in rasterized gaming scenarios.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84626, while the RX 7650 GRE scores 83109. The 8060S wins by 1.8%. This is a narrow margin, but it shows that the 8060S, despite having lower FP32 peak performance (14.85 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS), manages to outperform in this compute test. This could be attributed to the newer RDNA 3.5 architecture and higher boost clock of 2900 MHz.

The average benchmark scores tell a broader story. The 8060S averages 55757, which places it 0.1% above the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, 0.6% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 1.7% above the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, and 2.8% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The RX 7650 GRE averages 42723, sitting 1.2% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, 1.2% below the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, 1.3% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, and 1.3% below the NVIDIA Quadro M6000. This places the two cards in different performance tiers overall, with the 8060S competing near RTX 4080 territory in average compute scores, while the RX 7650 GRE is just under RTX 4070 SUPER level.

Notably, the 8060S wins the pixel rate and texture rate comparisons: 185.6 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s and 464.0 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s. Despite this, the RX 7650 GRE has higher raw FP32 throughput at 22.08 TFLOPS versus 14.85 TFLOPS. This suggests the 8060S has better efficiency per clock in certain operations, but the RX 7650 GRE can push more raw mathematical work when needed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8060S wins in general compute and average performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626 is higher, and its average benchmark score of 55757 is significantly above the RX 7650 GRE. It also has superior texture and pixel rates. The 8060S is the winner for integrated systems where power draw is limited to 55 W and no external power connector is available. Its higher boost clock of 2900 MHz and newer RDNA 3.5 architecture help it achieve these results despite lower base clocks. It is also the choice for systems using PCIe 5.0, as it can leverage that bus interface, though memory bandwidth remains system-dependent.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in dedicated gaming workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 is 7.4% higher, showing a clear edge in DirectX 12 rasterization. It has dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, which eliminates the variability of shared memory. Its higher FP32 throughput at 22.08 TFLOPS makes it better suited for compute-heavy tasks that can use raw shader power. The RX 7650 GRE also wins on memory predictability and has a fixed 128-bit bus, whereas the 8060S has no fixed memory specs. For desktop users with a 450 W PSU and dual-slot space, the RX 7650 GRE provides a more consistent gaming experience. Its release date is later, and it has a defined launch MSRP of 279 USD, though the 8060S has no listed MSRP.

In terms of wins tally, the head-to-head benchmarks show one win each. The RX 7650 GRE takes the 3DMark test, and the 8060S takes the Geekbench OpenCL test. The choice between them depends on whether the priority is peak gaming performance with dedicated VRAM or integrated compute with lower power and no physical card footprint. The 8060S is the better all-rounder by average score; the RX 7650 GRE is the better specialist for DX12 gaming.