AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7600M and AMD Radeon 8060S are two mobile graphics solutions from the same manufacturer, yet they target very different segments of the laptop market. The RX 7600M is a discrete part from the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the 8060S is a Strix Halo integrated processor from the Radeon RX 8000M generation, using RDNA 3.5. The data shows a single head-to-head benchmark result, where the 8060S wins decisively, but the broader specifications and benchmark records reveal a more nuanced picture. This analysis walks through the benchmark wins, architectural differences, and specification gaps to determine which part suits which workload.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark record is lopsided in terms of tests run, but the one direct comparison available is highly informative. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84,626 points, which is 24.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600M's score of 63,775. This is a substantial margin in a compute-heavy workload that stresses raw shading power and memory bandwidth. The 8060S also holds a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483, indicating strong cross-API compute performance, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162, which points to competitive gaming performance in modern APIs.

The RX 7600M, by contrast, has only one benchmark entry: the same Geekbench OpenCL test where it scores 63,775. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 89, which is higher than the 8060S's percentile of 87. This suggests that while the 8060S is faster in absolute compute terms, the RX 7600M sits in a slightly higher position relative to the entire GPU landscape, likely due to the 8060S's lower average benchmark score of 55,757 across all three of its tests, which pulls its percentile down. The RX 7600M's average score is identical to its Geekbench OpenCL result at 63,775, making it a more consistent performer in the limited data available.

In terms of nearest rivals, the RX 7600M trades blows with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (delta -0.1%) and NVIDIA CMP 30HX (delta -0.1%), while edging out the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1%. The 8060S, on the other hand, is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (delta 0.1%), trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 by 0.6%, and leads the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.7% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 by 2.8%. These rival comparisons show that the 8060S, despite its lower average score, competes in a higher performance tier than the RX 7600M when its best benchmark is considered.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Radeon 8060S for users who prioritize raw compute performance and modern API support. Its 24.6% lead in Geekbench OpenCL over the RX 7600M is the single most decisive metric in this comparison, and it also offers a Vulkan score that the RX 7600M cannot match in recorded benchmarks. The 8060S is the pick for workloads that leverage OpenCL or Vulkan compute, such as rendering, machine learning inference, or GPU-accelerated content creation. Its 84,626 OpenCL score places it in the company of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (delta -0.6%) and well ahead of the RTX 4080 (delta 2.8%), indicating a high level of compute throughput.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M, however, is not without its merits. Its 89th percentile ranking versus the 8060S's 87th suggests that, relative to the entire GPU population, it is a slightly more "average-friendly" part in terms of consistency. The RX 7600M also has a higher boost clock in practice for gaming scenarios? No, the 8060S has a higher boost clock of 2900 MHz versus 2410 MHz, but the RX 7600M has a higher base clock of 1500 MHz versus 1295 MHz. The RX 7600M's lower power draw of 90 W versus 55 W might seem counterintuitive, but the 8060S is an integrated part with a lower TDP that still delivers more compute performance. Users who need a discrete GPU with dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 128-bit bus might prefer the RX 7600M for memory isolation, but the 8060S's shared memory architecture is system-dependent and could be faster or slower depending on the host system's RAM. Given the benchmark data, the 8060S is the clear winner for compute, while the RX 7600M's edge is limited to its percentile consistency and dedicated memory, which are not directly benchmarked here.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head benchmark is the Geekbench OpenCL test, and it is a decisive win for the AMD Radeon 8060S. The 8060S scores 84,626, while the RX 7600M scores 63,775, yielding a delta of -24.6% from the perspective of the RX 7600M. This means the 8060S is roughly a quarter faster in this synthetic compute workload. This margin is substantial enough to affect real-world applications that rely on OpenCL, such as video encoding filters, physics simulations, or OpenCL-based rendering engines. The 8060S's 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 rating is lower than the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS, so the benchmark win is not simply a matter of raw FLOPs; it likely comes from the 8060S's newer RDNA 3.5 architecture, higher boost clock of 2900 MHz, and larger memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent but could exceed the RX 7600M's fixed 256.0 GB/s.

The RX 7600M has no other head-to-head benchmark results to counter this loss. Its texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s is far lower than the 8060S's 464.0 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s lags the 8060S's 185.6 GPixel/s. These throughput differences reinforce the benchmark outcome. The 8060S also has more shading units (2560 versus 1792), more texture mapping units (160 versus 112), and more ray tracing cores (40 versus 28), all of which contribute to its superior compute and rendering performance. The RX 7600M's only advantage in the spec sheet is its higher FP32 TFLOPS, but that does not translate into a benchmark win, indicating that the 8060S uses its resources more efficiently per clock.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84,626, which is 24.6% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600M's score of 63,775.

Q: Does the RX 7600M have a higher boost clock than the 8060S?

A: No, the 8060S has a boost clock of 2900 MHz, while the RX 7600M has a boost clock of 2410 MHz. The RX 7600M, however, has a higher base clock of 1500 MHz versus the 8060S's 1295 MHz.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has 2560 shading units, compared to 1792 on the AMD Radeon RX 7600M.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the 8060S uses System Shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth.

Q: How do their percentile rankings compare?

A: The RX 7600M has a percentile of 89 among all GPUs, while the 8060S has a percentile of 87, despite the 8060S having a higher OpenCL score.

Q: Which GPU has a higher texture fill rate?

A: The 8060S has a texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s, far exceeding the RX 7600M's 269.9 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent different architectural generations from AMD. The RX 7600M is based on RDNA 3.0, built on the Navi 33 chip with a codename of "Hotpink Bonefish." It uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, with a die size of 204 mm² and 13,300 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The 8060S, in contrast, uses RDNA 3.5 architecture on the Strix Halo chip, with no codename listed. It is built on a more advanced 4 nm process node from TSMC, with a larger die size of 308 mm². The transistor count for the 8060S is listed as "unknown," and its transistor density is not provided, making a direct comparison of transistor efficiency impossible from the data.

The memory architecture is a fundamental difference. The RX 7600M is a discrete GPU with dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a fixed 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8060S, as an integrated processor, uses System Shared memory, meaning its bus width and bandwidth are system-dependent and will vary based on the host laptop's RAM configuration. This makes the 8060S's memory performance highly variable, while the RX 7600M offers predictable, dedicated memory. The 8060S also supports a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving the 8060S double the theoretical bandwidth to the host system.

Both GPUs share the same DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support, so there is no difference in software feature levels. The 8060S has more ray tracing cores (40 versus 28), which is likely reflected in its higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162, though no comparable DX12 benchmark is recorded for the RX 7600M. The 8060S also has a higher pixel rate (185.6 GPixel/s vs 154.2 GPixel/s) and texture rate (464.0 GTexel/s vs 269.9 GTexel/s), indicating a more capable rasterization pipeline.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal a clear split between the two parts. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2410 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz, while the 8060S has a lower base clock of 1295 MHz but a much higher boost clock of 2900 MHz, with no game clock listed. The RX 7600M has a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the 8060S's memory clock is "System Shared."

In terms of compute units, the 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, while the RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The 8060S also has 40 RT cores versus 28 on the RX 7600M. The FP32 performance is one area where the RX 7600M leads, with 17.27 TFLOPS versus the 8060S's 14.85 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance is notably different: the RX 7600M achieves 34.55 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the 8060S achieves 14.85 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating the RX 7600M has faster FP16 throughput but the 8060S has no advantage in this metric.

The TDP is another major differentiator. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, while the 8060S has a TDP of 55 W. Both are listed as "IGP" slot width with no power connectors, and both have display outputs that are portable device dependent. The release dates are two years apart: the RX 7600M was released on 2023-01-03, while the 8060S was released on 2025-01-05. Both are currently active in production, and neither has a successor listed or a launch MSRP provided. The RX 7600M belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, while the 8060S has no series designation, but its generation is listed as Navi Mobile (RX 8000M). Both have their predecessor listed as Polaris Mobile, indicating a generational leap in architecture for both.