AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Comparison

The AMD Radeon 8060S and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB are remarkably close in overall performance, separated by a mere 0.1% in average benchmark scores (55757 vs 55698). However, the data reveals a clear split: the RX 6750 GRE dominates in the head-to-head tests, while the 8060S counters with a higher raw compute ceiling in one key API. Both cards sit at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, placing them in the same competitive tier, but their architectural approaches and target use cases diverge significantly.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 6750 GRE 12 GB wins both direct comparisons, and it does so decisively. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 6750 GRE scores 2402 against the 8060S’s 2162, a 10% advantage. That is a substantial margin in a modern DirectX 12 workload, indicating the dedicated graphics card’s memory subsystem and higher sustained clocks pay off in rasterization-heavy scenes.

The gap widens dramatically in the Geekbench Vulkan test. Here, the RX 6750 GRE posts 108994 versus the 8060S’s 80483, a 26.2% lead. This is the single largest performance differential between the two cards, and it suggests that Vulkan workloads — which often stress memory bandwidth and driver efficiency — heavily favor the discrete GPU. The 8060S’s reliance on system-shared memory appears to be a genuine bottleneck in this API.

Despite losing both head-to-head tests, the 8060S holds its own in aggregate scoring. Its average benchmark score of 55757 is actually 0.1% higher than the RX 6750 GRE’s 55698. This is possible because the 8060S has a third benchmark result — a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626 — that the RX 6750 GRE does not have in its results set. That OpenCL score, while not directly comparable to Vulkan, pulls the 8060S’s average upward.

The broader rivalry table confirms these two are near-perfect equals. The 8060S sits 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56083) and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828). The RX 6750 GRE is 0.7% behind the RTX 5080 and 1.6% ahead of the Pro W5700X. Both cards trail the RTX 4080 (54247) by roughly 2.7-2.8%. In short, the 8060S and RX 6750 GRE are interchangeable in overall performance, but not in workload-specific strengths.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on different generations of AMD’s RDNA architecture. The 8060S uses RDNA 3.5, implemented on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the RX 6750 GRE uses RDNA 2.0 on a 7 nm node. This process shrink allows the 8060S to achieve higher boost clocks (2900 MHz vs 2581 MHz) despite a dramatically lower thermal design power of 55 W versus 250 W. The 8060S also has a higher base clock at 1295 MHz, though the RX 6750 GRE’s base of 2321 MHz is much higher — the 8060S compensates with its more efficient architecture.

The chip designs differ fundamentally. The 8060S is built around the Strix Halo chip, a large 308 mm² die, while the RX 6750 GRE uses the Navi 22 chip with a 335 mm² die. Transistor counts are listed as unknown for the 8060S, but the RX 6750 GRE packs 17,200 million transistors at a density of 51.3 million per mm². The 8060S’s smaller die on a more advanced node suggests it likely has a high transistor density, but the data does not confirm this.

Core configurations are identical on paper: both have 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster operations pipelines, and 40 ray tracing cores. However, the 8060S’s higher clocks yield higher theoretical rates: 185.6 GPixel/s pixel fill rate versus 165.2 GPixel/s, and 464.0 GTexel/s texture rate versus 413.0 GTexel/s. The 8060S also leads in FP32 compute at 14.85 TFLOPS versus the RX 6750 GRE’s 13.21 TFLOPS. Interestingly, the RX 6750 GRE doubles its FP16 rate to 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the 8060S maintains a 1:1 ratio at 14.85 TFLOPS.

Memory is where the architectures diverge most sharply. The 8060S uses system-shared memory with dependent bandwidth, while the RX 6750 GRE has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. This dedicated bandwidth is almost certainly why the RX 6750 GRE wins the Vulkan test so decisively. The 8060S’s memory clock is listed as “System Shared,” and its bandwidth is “System Dependent,” meaning performance scales with the host system’s RAM.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher overall benchmark average?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S holds a marginal edge with an average benchmark score of 55757, compared to the RX 6750 GRE’s 55698 — a 0.1% difference.

Q: Why does the RX 6750 GRE win the Vulkan benchmark by such a large margin?

A: The RX 6750 GRE scores 108994 in Geekbench Vulkan versus the 8060S’s 80483, a 26.2% lead. This is likely due to its dedicated 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, whereas the 8060S relies on system-shared memory with dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which card has the higher boost clock?

A: The 8060S boosts to 2900 MHz, while the RX 6750 GRE boosts to 2581 MHz. However, the RX 6750 GRE has a much higher base clock at 2321 MHz versus 1295 MHz.

Q: Do both cards support the same modern APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The 8060S is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the RX 6750 GRE uses TSMC’s 7 nm node.

Q: How do these cards compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080?

A: The 8060S trails the RTX 5080 by 0.6%, while the RX 6750 GRE trails it by 0.7%. Both are effectively within a rounding error of the RTX 5080’s average score of 56083.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every physical and clock-related specification. The 8060S uses a 4 nm process; the RX 6750 GRE uses 7 nm. The 8060S has a die size of 308 mm²; the RX 6750 GRE is slightly larger at 335 mm². The RX 6750 GRE has a known transistor count of 17,200 million, while the 8060S’s count is unknown. The 8060S runs at a base clock of 1295 MHz and boost of 2900 MHz; the RX 6750 GRE runs at 2321 MHz base and 2581 MHz boost, with a game clock of 2439 MHz.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The 8060S has system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RX 6750 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Pixel rate favors the 8060S at 185.6 GPixel/s versus 165.2 GPixel/s, as does texture rate at 464.0 GTexel/s versus 413.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is also higher on the 8060S at 14.85 TFLOPS versus 13.21 TFLOPS. FP16 rates differ in ratio: the 8060S offers 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1), while the RX 6750 GRE offers 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specifications are starkly contrasted. The 8060S has a TDP of 55 W, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, and requires no external power. The RX 6750 GRE has a TDP of 250 W, is a dual-slot card requiring a 600 W suggested PSU and one 6-pin plus one 8-pin power connector. The 8060S uses PCIe 5.0 x16; the RX 6750 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the 8060S is “Portable Device Dependent,” while the RX 6750 GRE offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 6750 GRE has physical dimensions of 267 mm length, 110 mm height, and 40 mm width; the 8060S has no listed dimensions. Finally, the RX 6750 GRE has a launch MSRP of 334 USD; the 8060S has no listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is the clear winner for discrete, performance-oriented gaming. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks, with a 10% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad and a 26.2% lead in Geekbench Vulkan. Its dedicated 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a decisive advantage in memory-intensive workloads, and its higher base clock of 2321 MHz suggests it maintains performance more consistently under sustained load. It is also the only option with a defined physical footprint and a launch MSRP of 334 USD, making it a standard, installable graphics card for desktop systems.

The AMD Radeon 8060S wins on efficiency and theoretical compute. Its 55 W TDP versus 250 W is a massive power advantage, and its RDNA 3.5 architecture on 4 nm delivers higher peak clock rates (2900 MHz boost) and higher fill rates (185.6 GPixel/s) despite consuming a fraction of the power. Its FP32 output of 14.85 TFLOPS is 12% higher than the RX 6750 GRE’s 13.21 TFLOPS, which could benefit compute-heavy tasks that are not memory-bandwidth-limited. The 8060S’s system-shared memory design and PCIe 5.0 interface also make it suitable for portable devices where dedicated graphics is not feasible.

For users choosing between the two, the data is unambiguous: if the workload is Vulkan or DirectX 12 gaming, the RX 6750 GRE delivers measurably more performance. If the priority is power efficiency, portability, or raw FP32 throughput in a constrained thermal envelope, the 8060S is the stronger candidate. In aggregate, they are statistical equals, but their strengths lie in opposite directions — one is a dedicated high-power gaming card, the other a low-power integrated solution with a theoretical edge.