AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and the AMD Radeon 8060S occupy very different corners of the GPU landscape, despite their similar average benchmark scores. The Pro Vega 64X is an end-of-life, high-power workstation part built on older GCN architecture, while the Radeon 8060S is a current, ultra-efficient mobile processor using RDNA 3.5. The data shows a clear generational shift in performance-per-watt and feature set, but the final choice depends heavily on whether the workload prioritizes raw compute efficiency or modern API support.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is in Geekbench OpenCL, and the results favor the newer part. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84,626, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X trails at 78,565. This translates to a 7.2% deficit for the Pro Vega 64X in this specific test. While a single test doesn't tell the whole story, it is notable that the 8060S achieves this victory while consuming significantly less power and using a smaller die.

Looking at their overall average scores, the Radeon 8060S holds a slight edge with 82,555 points compared to the Pro Vega 64X's 80,611. The Pro Vega 64X sits at the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, while the 8060S is one step higher at the 94th percentile. The Pro Vega 64X's nearest rival is the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation, which scores 81,916 and beats it by 1.6%. The 8060S, meanwhile, is 0.8% ahead of that same RTX 2000 Ada Generation card, showing these two AMD parts are closely matched against the same competition.

The performance gap between the two AMD cards is modest in raw terms. The 8060S is 2.4% ahead of the Pro Vega 64X in average score, which puts them in the same performance tier. However, the nature of their benchmark coverage differs. The Pro Vega 64X's data includes a Geekbench Metal score of 82,656, while the 8060S shows a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483. The 8060S's OpenCL result of 84,626 is its strongest showing in the available data, while the Pro Vega 64X's OpenCL result of 78,565 is its weakest.

Architecture Differences

These two GPUs are separated by more than just time; they represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on the Vega 10 chip using the GCN 5.0 architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 12,500 million transistors onto a massive 495 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 25.3 million per square millimeter. The Radeon 8060S, in contrast, uses the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is a much smaller 308 mm², and while its transistor count is not listed, the density improvement from the newer process is evident.

The compute configuration differs substantially. The Pro Vega 64X features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The Radeon 8060S has fewer shading units at 2560 and fewer TMUs at 160, but it matches the ROP count at 64. Critically, the 8060S includes 40 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the older Pro Vega 64X. The raw throughput numbers tell an interesting story: the Pro Vega 64X achieves a pixel rate of 93.95 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 375.8 GTexel/s, while the 8060S nearly doubles the pixel rate to 185.6 GPixel/s and pushes texture rate to 464.0 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds are another major dividing line. The Pro Vega 64X runs at a base clock of 1250 MHz with a boost of 1468 MHz. The Radeon 8060S starts slightly higher at 1295 MHz base but boosts to a much higher 2900 MHz. This clock advantage, combined with the architectural efficiency of RDNA 3.5, allows the 8060S to deliver higher FP32 throughput at 14.85 TFLOPS compared to the Pro Vega 64X's 12.03 TFLOPS. The FP16 numbers follow the same pattern, with the 8060S hitting 29.70 TFLOPS versus 24.05 TFLOPS for the Pro Vega 64X.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X's strengths lie in its dedicated memory subsystem. It comes with 16 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a fixed, dedicated pool of fast memory that does not compete with the system for resources. For workloads that are sensitive to memory bandwidth and require consistent, predictable performance, this configuration has clear advantages. The Pro Vega 64X also supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, which covers most professional and legacy applications.

The AMD Radeon 8060S wins in nearly every other measurable category. Its power efficiency is the standout difference, with a 55 W TDP compared to the Pro Vega 64X's 250 W. This makes it suitable for portable devices where thermal and power constraints are paramount. The inclusion of 40 ray tracing cores gives it a hardware capability that the Pro Vega 64X simply lacks, making it the better choice for modern games and applications that leverage ray-traced effects. The 8060S also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, offering the latest API features.

The 8060S's system-shared memory architecture is a double-edged sword. It allows the GPU to access as much memory as the system has, but the bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent." This means performance can scale with the host system's memory configuration, but it also introduces variability. The Pro Vega 64X's fixed 16 GB HBM2 pool is more predictable in professional environments where memory behavior must be consistent.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for these two GPUs reveal dozens of divergences, but the most consequential differences are listed below:

• Process Node: 14 nm (Pro Vega 64X) vs 4 nm (8060S)
• Foundry: GlobalFoundries vs TSMC
• Die Size: 495 mm² vs 308 mm²
• Transistors: 12,500 million vs not listed
• Base Clock: 1250 MHz vs 1295 MHz
• Boost Clock: 1468 MHz vs 2900 MHz
• Memory: 16 GB HBM2 vs System Shared
• Memory Bus: 2048 bit vs System Shared
• Memory Bandwidth: 512.0 GB/s vs System Dependent
• Shading Units: 4096 vs 2560
• TMUs: 256 vs 160
• ROPs: 64 vs 64
• Ray Tracing Cores: None vs 40
• Pixel Rate: 93.95 GPixel/s vs 185.6 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 375.8 GTexel/s vs 464.0 GTexel/s
• FP32 Performance: 12.03 TFLOPS vs 14.85 TFLOPS
• FP16 Performance: 24.05 TFLOPS vs 29.70 TFLOPS
• TDP: 250 W vs 55 W
• Bus Interface: PCIe 3.0 x16 vs PCIe 5.0 x16
• DirectX Support: 12 (12_1) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2)
• Vulkan Support: 1.3 vs 1.4
• Production Status: End-of-life vs Active
• Release Date: 2019-03-18 vs 2025-01-05
• Predecessor: None vs Polaris Mobile

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has a higher average benchmark score of 82,555, compared to the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 80,611. The 8060S also holds a higher percentile ranking at 94 versus 93.

Q: How much faster is the Radeon 8060S in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The Radeon 8060S scores 84,626 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 7.2% higher than the Pro Vega 64X's score of 78,565.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro Vega 64X support ray tracing?

A: No. The Pro Vega 64X has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications. The Radeon 8060S, by contrast, includes 40 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the TDP differences between these two cards?

A: The Radeon Pro Vega 64X has a TDP of 250 W, while the Radeon 8060S has a significantly lower TDP of 55 W. This makes the 8060S far more suitable for power-constrained mobile devices.

Q: How does the memory configuration differ?

A: The Pro Vega 64X uses 16 GB of dedicated HBM2 memory with a 2048-bit bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8060S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which card has the higher boost clock?

A: The Radeon 8060S has a boost clock of 2900 MHz, which is nearly double the Pro Vega 64X's boost clock of 1468 MHz.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear choice for most users. The AMD Radeon 8060S is the superior product in almost every meaningful way. It is faster in the available benchmark, more power-efficient by a wide margin (55 W vs 250 W), supports modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate, and is built on a much more advanced 4 nm process. Its higher FP32 throughput of 14.85 TFLOPS versus 12.03 TFLOPS and higher pixel rate of 185.6 GPixel/s versus 93.95 GPixel/s confirm its architectural advantage. For any new system, especially a mobile one, the 8060S is the rational pick.

The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X retains relevance only in narrow circumstances. Its 16 GB of dedicated HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a level of memory predictability that the 8060S cannot guarantee with its system-shared design. If a workload absolutely requires consistent, high-bandwidth dedicated memory and does not need ray tracing or the latest API features, the older card still has a role. Its 93rd percentile ranking also shows it remains a competent performer, but its 250 W TDP and end-of-life status make it difficult to recommend for any new build. The benchmark results indicate the 8060S is the better all-around choice for the vast majority of scenarios.