AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc Pro B65 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon 760M and the Intel Arc Pro B65. The Radeon 760M has a full set of recorded scores across multiple test suites, while the Intel Arc Pro B65 currently has no benchmark entries at all. This absence of comparative data makes a direct score-by-score analysis impossible.

What the recorded data does show is the Radeon 760M's positioning within the broader GPU landscape. Its average benchmark score is 6019, placing it at the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered around this figure. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 sits 0.3% ahead with an average score of 6001, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M matches that 0.3% lead at 6000, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server trails by 0.4% at 5996. The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 leads by 0.5% at 6049. These margins are remarkably small, indicating the Radeon 760M performs within a narrow band of established discrete GPUs.

Individual benchmark scores for the Radeon 760M show its strongest results in compute-oriented tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score reaches 30336, while Geekbench OpenCL records 20255. PassMark GPU Compute adds 2840. In DirectX tests, the PassMark DirectX 9 score is 65, DirectX 11 is 52, DirectX 12 is 25, and DirectX 10 is 19. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records 400. PassMark G3D shows 5310, with G2D at 890. The spread from 19 in DirectX 10 to 65 in DirectX 9 suggests varying optimization levels across API generations.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the Phoenix chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, part of the Navi III IGP generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The transistor density reaches 142.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B65 uses the BMG-G21 chip on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage Pro Series. It uses a 5 nm process also at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a larger 272 mm² die, giving a lower density of 72.1 million per square millimeter.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The Radeon 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and boosts to 2599 MHz, a substantial jump. The Arc Pro B65 runs at a flat 2400 MHz for both base and boost, suggesting a fixed operating point. Memory configurations diverge completely. The Radeon 760M uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The Arc Pro B65 carries 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.0 GB/s bandwidth at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Compute resources favor the Intel part heavily. The Arc Pro B65 has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate measures 192.0 GPixel/s for Intel versus 41.58 GPixel/s for AMD. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput reaches 12.29 TFLOPS on the Arc Pro B65, more than double the Radeon 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS. FP16 performance shows a different ratio: Intel achieves 24.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 rate, while AMD achieves 5.323 TFLOPS at 1:1.

Power and physical requirements reflect the performance gap. The Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor with a 15 W TDP and no power connectors. The Arc Pro B65 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 200 W TDP, one 8-pin connector, and a suggested power supply of 550 W. Interface support also differs: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8, Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are motherboard dependent on the AMD side, while the Intel card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmarks, the recorded specifications and the Radeon 760M's existing scores define the use-case split. The Radeon 760M wins on integration and efficiency. Its 15 W TDP, IGP form factor, and system shared memory make it suitable for compact systems where a discrete card cannot fit. The recorded benchmark data shows it holds its own against small discrete GPUs like the RX 6400 and GTX 770M, with average scores within 0.3%. That indicates adequate performance for lighter workloads, particularly given its 35th percentile standing across all GPUs.

The Arc Pro B65 wins on raw capability and memory bandwidth. The 608.0 GB/s bandwidth, 32 GB capacity, and 256-bit bus address large datasets efficiently. Its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate position it for demanding compute tasks. The 20 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units provide substantial geometry and shading headroom. The flat 2400 MHz clock suggests sustained throughput without boost variance.

The Radeon 760M's API scores indicate specific strengths. The Geekbench Vulkan result of 30336 nearly doubles the OpenCL score of 20255, suggesting particularly strong Vulkan compute performance relative to its own OpenCL output. PassMark scores show DirectX 9 at 65, the highest of its DirectX results, while DirectX 12 sits at 25. This pattern implies older API workloads run relatively better than newer ones on this part. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 provides a baseline for modern gaming workloads.

The Arc Pro B65 has no scores to compare, so its wins derive from specification analysis. The 2:1 FP16 ratio versus the 1:1 ratio on AMD indicates different precision handling strategies. Intel's architecture may benefit workloads using FP16 arithmetic, while AMD's 1:1 ratio suggests equal FP16 and FP32 throughput. The larger die size of 272 mm² versus 178 mm² offers more physical area for execution units, though the lower transistor density on 5 nm versus 4 nm reflects different design trade-offs.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The Radeon 760M belongs to the integrated GPU class, with an average benchmark score of 6019 and a 35th percentile rank. Its nearest rivals, all discrete GPUs, sit within 0.5% of its average score. That clustering indicates the Radeon 760M delivers competitive performance for an IGP, particularly given its 15 W power envelope. Buyers needing a self-contained graphics solution with modest power draw would find the recorded scores adequate for standard workloads.

The Arc Pro B65 targets a different segment entirely. Its specifications place it in professional discrete territory: 32 GB GDDR6, 608.0 GB/s bandwidth, 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, and a 200 W TDP. The 50th percentile rating comes from its specification profile, not measured results, since no benchmarks exist. The absence of recorded scores means the database cannot currently validate its real-world performance. The flat 2400 MHz clock and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface suggest a workstation-oriented design.

Selection depends on the workload context. For systems requiring low power, minimal space, and shared memory flexibility, the Radeon 760M has measured results to support its use. For workloads demanding high memory bandwidth, large frame buffers, and substantial compute throughput, the Arc Pro B65's specifications indicate the necessary resources, though performance remains unverified in the database. The 4 nm process and higher transistor density on the AMD side suggest efficiency advantages, while the Intel side offers more execution units and dedicated memory.

The verdict from recorded data: the Radeon 760M is a proven integrated solution with documented scores, while the Arc Pro B65 is a high-specification discrete card awaiting benchmark validation. Each wins in its own domain, but only the AMD part has numbers to confirm its standing.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 scores 6001 (0.3% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6000 (0.3% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5996 (0.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6049 (0.5% ahead).

Q: What is the Intel Arc Pro B65's average benchmark score?

A: The Arc Pro B65 has no recorded benchmark results in the database, giving it an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile rating of 50 comes from specification-based analysis rather than measured performance.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M uses system shared memory with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all system dependent. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS. The Intel part also achieves 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, versus AMD's 5.323 TFLOPS at 1:1.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has a 15 W TDP, uses an IGP slot width, and requires no power connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has a 200 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design, requires one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon 760M has recorded scores across these APIs, while the Arc Pro B65 has no benchmark data.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon 760M | Intel Arc Pro B65 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | Phoenix | BMG-G21 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Generation | Navi III IGP (Phoenix) | Battlemage (Pro Series) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 25,390 million | 19,600 million |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 272 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 142.6M / mm² | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 32 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 608.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 32 | 160 |

| ROPs | 16 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 20 |

| Pixel Rate | 41.58 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 83.17 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.323 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 200 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2024-01-30 | 2026-03-31 |

| Predecessor | Navi II IGP | None |