AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor designed for thin-and-light laptops, drawing power from the system's shared memory. Its benchmark profile is well-documented across multiple DirectX versions and compute workloads. The recorded data shows the 760M scoring 5,310 in Passmark G3D, 2,840 in Passmark GPU Compute, 20,255 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 30,336 in Geekbench Vulkan. It also posts 400 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with Passmark scores of 65 in DirectX 9, 52 in DirectX 11, 25 in DirectX 12, and 19 in DirectX 10. The 760M's average benchmark score sits at 6,019, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, with no wins registered in head-to-head comparisons. The absence of measured performance data means the Arc Pro B60 Dual cannot be credited with any benchmark victories. What the database does record are its specifications and its 50th percentile ranking, which reflects its position among all GPUs based on its listed capabilities, not on actual test scores.

The use-case split is therefore asymmetrical. The Radeon 760M wins every category where measurements exist simply because it is the only one with data. For gaming workloads, the 760M shows its strongest results in legacy DirectX 9 titles, where it scores 65, and in Vulkan, where it reaches 30,336. For compute-oriented tasks, OpenCL performance at 20,255 suggests reasonable general-purpose throughput. The Arc Pro B60 Dual's intended role, as a professional graphics card with 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, cannot be validated through benchmark results because the database contains none.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the Phoenix chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, belonging to the Navi III IGP generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 142.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture, from the Battlemage Pro Series generation. It is built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors spread across a larger 272 mm² die, yielding a lower transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The Radeon 760M relies on system shared memory, with its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The Arc Pro B60 Dual carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz or 19 Gbps effective. The Radeon's memory clock is also listed as system shared, meaning its performance scales with the host system's RAM configuration.

Compute resources differ substantially. The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. These counts are five times higher for shading units, five times for TMUs, and five times for ROPs, with 2.5 times more ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B60 Dual also has a much higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 41.58 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Radeon 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2,599 MHz. The Arc Pro B60 Dual starts at 2,000 MHz base and boosts to 2,400 MHz. The Radeon's higher boost clock does not compensate for its far lower resource count. Floating point performance confirms this: the Radeon delivers 5.323 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Radeon maintains a 1:1 ratio at 5.323 TFLOPS, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual achieves 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical characteristics diverge sharply. The Radeon 760M is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and motherboard-dependent display outputs. The Arc Pro B60 Dual is a dual-slot card with a 400 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, an 800 W suggested PSU, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. It measures 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Radeon has no listed dimensions. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Radeon uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records zero head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs, and the win counts are zero for both. This means there are no direct comparison scores to walk through. The only quantitative comparison available comes from the Radeon 760M's nearest rivals in the database, which provide context for its performance tier.

The Radeon 760M's average benchmark score of 6,019 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6400, which averages 6,001. It is also 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6,000, and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5,996. Against the NVIDIA Quadro P2000, which averages 6,049, the Radeon 760M trails by 0.5%. These delta percentages indicate that the 760M sits in a narrow performance band, essentially tied with several discrete GPUs from previous generations.

For the Arc Pro B60 Dual, no such rival data exists. Its percentile rank of 50 suggests it sits at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without benchmark scores, this ranking cannot be tied to any specific measured performance. The 24 GB memory capacity and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are the only performance-related figures available for the Intel card.

The biggest wins in this comparison are therefore structural rather than measured. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2.3 times the FP32 throughput of the Radeon 760M (12.29 versus 5.323 TFLOPS), 4.6 times the pixel rate (192.0 versus 41.58 GPixel/s), and 4.6 times the texture rate (384.0 versus 83.17 GTexel/s). Its memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s is not directly comparable to the Radeon's system-dependent figure, but the dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 pool is a categorical advantage over shared memory.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6,019, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has an average benchmark score of 0, because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Radeon 760M uses system shared memory, with size and type dependent on the host system. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures?

A: The Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 2.3 times.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The Radeon 760M has a 15 W TDP and no power connectors. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests an 800 W PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, while the Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, a fivefold difference.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split. The AMD Radeon 760M is a measured, active product with a full set of benchmark scores across DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and Passmark G2D and G3D tests. Its 35th percentile ranking and an average score of 6,019 place it in the company of older discrete GPUs like the RX 6400 and GTX 770M, all within a 0.5% band. Its 15 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for systems where dedicated graphics are not an option.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a specification-only entry. It has no benchmarks, no wins, and no rivals listed. Its 50th percentile rank is a placeholder based on its presence in the database, not on measured performance. The hardware specifications indicate a much larger, more powerful card: 24 GB of GDDR6, 2,560 shading units, 20 ray tracing cores, 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, and a 400 W TDP with an 800 W suggested PSU. These figures point to a professional workstation or content-creation GPU, but the database cannot confirm actual performance.

Who should pick which depends entirely on what the data supports. For a buyer needing verified benchmark results, the Radeon 760M is the only option with recorded scores. For a buyer evaluating raw specification sheets, the Arc Pro B60 Dual offers substantially more compute resources, memory capacity, and bandwidth, but any performance claim must remain unverified. The data does not support a direct performance ranking because one side has no measurements.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 760M | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 25,390 million | 19,600 million |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 272 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 142.6M / mm² | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 456.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 32 | 160 |

| ROPs | 16 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 20 |

| Pixel Rate | 41.58 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 83.17 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.323 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 400 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 800 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Length | None | 300 mm (11.8 inches) |

| Height | None | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |

| Width | None | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |