AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc Pro B390 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Radeon 760M and the Intel Arc Pro B390. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and neither part has a recorded win count in direct comparison testing. This absence of matched-pair results means any comparison must rely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD Radeon 760M and the architectural specifications listed for the Intel Arc Pro B390.

For the AMD Radeon 760M, the recorded data includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 20,255, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,336. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 5,310, a G2D score of 890, and a GPU compute score of 2,840. Older DirectX tests produce 65 for DX9, 52 for DX11, 25 for DX12, and 19 for DX10. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6,019, placing the 760M at the 35th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, though this percentile appears to be a placeholder given the absence of measured results. The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon 760M provide context: the AMD Radeon RX 6400 scores 6,001 (0.3% ahead of the 760M), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6,000 (0.3% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5,996 (0.4% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6,049 (0.5% behind). These deltas are all within half a percent, indicating the 760M sits in a tightly packed performance band around the 6,000 mark.

Since the Intel Arc Pro B390 lacks measured scores, no numeric comparison of benchmark wins is possible. The data can only show the 760M's absolute scores and its position relative to its own nearest rivals.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M shows its strongest recorded results in compute-oriented workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,336 is roughly 50% higher than the OpenCL score of 20,255, indicating the RDNA 3.0 architecture handles Vulkan compute particularly well. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2,840 is about 53% of the G3D score of 5,310, suggesting the part does not scale compute performance proportionally to graphics. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 is low in absolute terms, but this is a modern, demanding test for an integrated GPU.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no benchmark wins in the database because it has no recorded scores. Its specifications, however, indicate where it would likely outperform the 760M if measured. The Arc Pro B390 has 1,536 shading units versus 512 for the 760M, a 3x difference. Its pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s versus 41.58 GPixel/s, a 44% advantage. Its texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s, a 44% advantage. Its FP32 throughput is 7.680 TFLOPS versus 5.323 TFLOPS, a 44% lead. The Arc Pro B390 also has 12 ray tracing cores versus 8, and its FP16 rate of 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1) is nearly 3x the 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1).

For use-case splits, the 760M's recorded data shows it as a balanced integrated solution with a Vulkan compute strength. The Arc Pro B390, based on its specifications alone, appears positioned for higher-throughput workloads, particularly those that scale with shading units, texture fill, and FP16 compute. The 80 W TDP of the Arc Pro B390 versus 15 W for the 760M also indicates the Intel part is designed for a different power envelope, likely in larger portable or workstation devices.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 760M is built on the Phoenix chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It contains 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6 million per mm². It belongs to the Navi III IGP (Phoenix) generation and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Its predecessor is Navi II IGP. The base clock is 800 MHz with a boost clock of 2,599 MHz.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is built on the Panther Lake chip using Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown or null in the database. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation and uses an IGP bus interface (no PCIe lanes listed). Its predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. The base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2,500 MHz, meaning the 760M has a 99 MHz higher boost clock but the Arc Pro B390 has a much lower base clock.

Both parts use system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, so no dedicated VRAM comparison is possible. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B390 has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. The 760M has no tensor core listing; the Arc Pro B390 also has null tensor cores.

Power characteristics differ substantially. The 760M is rated at 15 W TDP with no power connectors and an IGP slot width. The Arc Pro B390 is rated at 80 W TDP, also with no power connectors and an IGP slot width. The 760M's display outputs are motherboard dependent, while the Arc Pro B390's are portable device dependent, reflecting their intended integration contexts.

The release dates are 2024-01-30 for the 760M and 2026-01-26 for the Arc Pro B390, a gap of roughly two years. Both are listed as Active production status.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear but conditional verdict. For anyone relying on measured benchmarks, the AMD Radeon 760M is the only part with actual scores. Its average benchmark score of 6,019 places it at the 35th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average, meaning it sits in a highly competitive mid-range band. The 760M's Vulkan score of 30,336 versus OpenCL of 20,255 indicates strong Vulkan compute capability, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400 shows it can run modern DX12 workloads at entry-level performance.

For the Intel Arc Pro B390, the database contains no measured scores, so no performance verdict can be derived from benchmark data. The architectural specifications, however, show a part with 3x the shading units, 1.5x the ROPs, 1.5x the ray tracing cores, and 44% higher pixel, texture, and FP32 rates than the 760M. Its FP16 rate of 15.36 TFLOPS is nearly 3x the 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS, indicating a strong compute advantage in FP16 workloads. The 80 W TDP versus 15 W confirms this is a higher-power part.

Who should pick which, strictly from the data: users with a Phoenix-based system needing a proven, measured integrated GPU with a known benchmark profile should select the AMD Radeon 760M. Users with a Panther Lake-based portable device that can supply 80 W to the GPU and who need higher shading unit count, FP16 throughput, and ray tracing capability should select the Intel Arc Pro B390, but they should be aware that no benchmark scores exist in the database to validate its real-world performance. The 760M's 35th percentile ranking is a measured fact; the Arc Pro B390's 50th percentile is listed without supporting scores, making it an unverified figure.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 760M?

A: The average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 760M is 6,019, placing it at the 35th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B390 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B390, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is 0.3% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M is 0.3% ahead, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 0.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 is 0.5% behind.

Q: What are the shading unit counts for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has 512 shading units. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has 1,536 shading units, exactly 3 times as many.

Q: What is the FP16 compute difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel Arc Pro B390 delivers 15.36 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, roughly 2.9 times higher.

Q: What power envelopes do these parts use?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M is rated at 15 W TDP. The Intel Arc Pro B390 is rated at 80 W TDP. Neither uses power connectors.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon 760M | Intel Arc Pro B390 |

|---|---|---|

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| Transistors | 25,390 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 142.6M / mm² | Null |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2,599 MHz | 2,500 MHz |

| Shading Units | 512 | 1,536 |

| TMUs | 32 | 48 |

| ROPs | 16 | 24 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Pixel Rate | 41.58 GPixel/s | 60.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 83.17 GTexel/s | 120.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.323 TFLOPS | 7.680 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 80 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2024-01-30 | 2026-01-26 |

| Predecessor | Navi II IGP | HD Graphics-WM |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 6,019 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 35 | 50 |