AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 760M and the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU cannot be compared directly through head-to-head benchmark results, as the database contains no shared test scores for the two parts. The Radeon 760M has a full benchmark profile, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no recorded benchmark entries. This absence of overlapping data means any performance comparison must rely on architectural specifications and the Radeon 760M's placement against other GPUs.

The Radeon 760M posts an average benchmark score of 6019 across ten tests. Its strongest results come in compute-oriented workloads: Geekbench Vulkan scores 30336, Geekbench OpenCL scores 20255, and Passmark GPU Compute scores 2840. In synthetic 3D workloads, it records 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 400 points. The Passmark suite shows a split between legacy and modern APIs: DirectX 9 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 52, DirectX 12 scores 25, and DirectX 10 scores 19. The 2D workload result is 890 in Passmark G2D, while the overall Passmark G3D score is 5310.

The Radeon 760M's percentile ranking among all GPUs is 35, placing it below the midpoint of the database. Its nearest rivals by average score are tightly clustered. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 sits at 6001, just 0.3% below the 760M. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M matches at 6000, also 0.3% lower. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server records 5996, 0.4% behind. On the other side, the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 posts 6049, which is 0.5% ahead. This grouping shows the 760M performs within a narrow band around the 6000-point mark, with no rival more than half a percent away in either direction.

Because the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no benchmark scores, its average is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals or percentile data. The database cannot produce a head-to-head win count for either part; both winsA and winsB are 0. Any statement about relative performance must therefore be derived from the specification differences, particularly the compute unit counts, clock speeds, and memory configurations.

The Verdict

From the available data, the AMD Radeon 760M is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark results. Its average score of 6019 and its 35th percentile ranking provide concrete reference points. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no recorded measurements, so it cannot be positioned against the 760M or any other GPU in the database. Users seeking verified performance data should consider the Radeon 760M, as it has a complete benchmark profile across DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and compute workloads.

The Radeon 760M belongs to the Navi III IGP (Phoenix) generation, uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, and is built on a 4 nm process. It delivers 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is higher than the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's 4.147 TFLOPS. However, the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU counters with a higher boost clock of 2700 MHz versus 2599 MHz, and it has more shading units (768 versus 512), more texture mapping units (48 versus 32), more raster output units (32 versus 16), and more ray tracing cores (12 versus 8). These architectural advantages give the Z2 Go GPU higher theoretical pixel and texture rates: 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s, compared to 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s for the 760M.

The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU also brings a dedicated memory system: 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 760M uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. This gives the Z2 Go GPU a clear advantage in memory-bound scenarios, even though its raw FP32 throughput is lower. The Z2 Go GPU's FP16 rate of 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) doubles its FP32 figure, while the 760M runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, matching its FP32 output at 5.323 TFLOPS.

The data suggests the Radeon 760M is the verified performer for existing benchmarks, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU offers superior theoretical specifications in several areas. Without benchmark scores for the Z2 Go GPU, the verdict leans toward the 760M for anyone requiring measured results, but the Z2 Go GPU's hardware profile indicates it may excel in memory-heavy or ray-traced workloads if those specifications translate to real-world performance.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the Phoenix chip. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process, with the Rembrandt+ chip. This process difference is significant: the 760M's 4 nm node allows for a transistor density of 142.6M per mm², while the Z2 Go GPU's 6 nm node achieves 63.0M per mm².

The transistor counts reflect this density gap. The Radeon 760M packs 25,390 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU contains 13,100 million transistors on a larger 208 mm² die. Despite having fewer transistors, the Z2 Go GPU's larger die size means its overall dimensions are bigger, but its lower density indicates a less compact design.

Compute resources differ substantially. The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. This gives the Z2 Go GPU a 50% advantage in shading units, a 50% advantage in TMUs, a 100% advantage in ROPs, and a 50% advantage in ray tracing cores. These higher counts drive its pixel rate of 86.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 129.6 GTexel/s, both roughly double the 760M's corresponding rates of 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s.

Clock behavior also differs. Both GPUs share a base clock of 800 MHz. The boost clock is higher on the Z2 Go GPU at 2700 MHz, compared to 2599 MHz on the 760M. The memory clock differs fundamentally: the 760M uses system shared memory with no dedicated clock, while the Z2 Go GPU specifies a memory clock of 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective data rate.

FP32 and FP16 throughput follow different patterns. The Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS in FP32 and the same 5.323 TFLOPS in FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU delivers 4.147 TFLOPS in FP32 but 8.294 TFLOPS in FP16, a 2:1 ratio. The Z2 Go GPU's FP16 output is therefore significantly higher, while its FP32 output is lower.

Both GPUs support the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores. The power profile differs, with the 760M rated at 15 W TDP and the Z2 Go GPU at 28 W TDP. The Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no slot width, while the Z2 Go GPU has no slot width data but lists a single display output of 1x USB Type-C, versus motherboard-dependent outputs for the 760M.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS in FP32, compared to 4.147 TFLOPS for the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU boosts to 2700 MHz, while the AMD Radeon 760M boosts to 2599 MHz. Both have an 800 MHz base clock.

Q: How do the memory systems differ?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 16 GB of LPDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 12 ray tracing cores, while the AMD Radeon 760M has 8.

Q: What are the process nodes for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M is built on a 4 nm TSMC process, and the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU is built on a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: Do the GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M wins in raw FP32 compute, posting 5.323 TFLOPS versus 4.147 TFLOPS for the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU. This advantage applies to workloads that rely on single-precision floating-point calculations, such as general 3D rendering and standard graphics shaders. The 760M also has a smaller die at 178 mm² versus 208 mm², a higher transistor density at 142.6M per mm² versus 63.0M per mm², and a lower TDP at 15 W versus 28 W. Its 4 nm process node is more advanced than the 6 nm node used by the Z2 Go GPU, which could translate to better power efficiency per transistor.

The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU wins in several theoretical performance categories. Its shading unit count of 768 is 50% higher than the 760M's 512. Its TMU count of 48 is 50% higher, and its ROP count of 32 is double the 760M's 16. It also has 12 ray tracing cores versus 8, a 50% advantage. These specifications yield higher pixel and texture rates: 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s, compared to 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s. The Z2 Go GPU's FP16 throughput of 8.294 TFLOPS is notably higher than the 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS, making it better suited for workloads that can leverage half-precision math.

Memory is a clear win for the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU. It has a dedicated 16 GB LPDDR5 pool on a 128-bit bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 760M relies on system shared memory, and its bandwidth is listed as system dependent, meaning performance varies with the host system's memory configuration. The Z2 Go GPU's fixed memory bandwidth provides a consistent baseline for memory-intensive tasks.

The Radeon 760M wins on benchmark data availability. It has ten recorded scores spanning multiple APIs, including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 400, Geekbench Vulkan at 30336, Geekbench OpenCL at 20255, and Passmark G3D at 5310. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no benchmarks in the database, so its real-world performance cannot be verified. The 760M's average score of 6019 places it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.5% in either direction.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 760M | AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |

| Chip | Phoenix | Rembrandt+ |

| Generation | Navi III IGP (Phoenix) | Console GPU (AMD) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 25,390 million | 13,100 million |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 208 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 142.6M / mm² | 63.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz | 2700 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 102.4 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 768 |

| TMUs | 32 | 48 |

| ROPs | 16 | 32 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Pixel Rate | 41.58 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 83.17 GTexel/s | 129.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 5.323 TFLOPS | 4.147 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1) | 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 28 W |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Not specified |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | 1x USB Type-C |

| Release Date | 2024-01-30 | 2024-12-31 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

The specification table shows a clear division: the Radeon 760M leads in process technology, transistor count, FP32 compute, and power efficiency, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU leads in clock speed, memory capacity and bandwidth, shading units, TMUs, ROPs, ray tracing cores, pixel rate, texture rate, and FP16 compute. Both support identical APIs and have no power connectors. The release dates differ by nearly a year, with the 760M launching in January 2024 and the Z2 Go GPU in December 2024.