AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP represent two very different ends of AMD’s graphics spectrum, one being an integrated processor graphics solution and the other a dedicated low-profile add-in board. The database shows a clear hierarchy between them, but the magnitude of the gap varies significantly depending on the workload, which makes the comparison more nuanced than a simple look at average scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two benchmarks that directly compare these GPUs reveal a decisive advantage for the RX 9060 XT LP, but the size of that advantage is not uniform. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 9060 XT LP scores 88,183 points against the 760M’s 20,255 points. This translates to a delta of -77%, meaning the RX 9060 XT LP delivers more than four times the compute performance in this particular API test. The 760M is an IGP with 512 shading units, while the RX 9060 XT LP uses 2,048 shading units, a 4x difference that directly explains this massive OpenCL gap.

The Vulkan test tells a different story in terms of relative scaling. The RX 9060 XT LP records 39,476 points, while the 760M manages 30,336 points. The delta here is -23.2%, which is still a solid win for the dedicated card but nowhere near the OpenCL margin. This suggests that the 760M’s RDNA 3.0 architecture handles Vulkan workloads relatively efficiently for its size, or that the RX 9060 XT LP’s RDNA 4.0 design does not scale its advantage as strongly in this specific test. The data records 0 wins for the 760M and 2 wins for the RX 9060 XT LP in head-to-head matchups, so the outcome is never in doubt, but the Vulkan result shows the gap is not insurmountable in every scenario.

The average benchmark scores further contextualize these results. The 760M has an average score of 6,019 across its ten recorded benchmarks, while the RX 9060 XT LP averages 63,830 across its two recorded tests. That is a difference of over 10x in average score, but the RX 9060 XT LP’s average is derived from only two high-end compute tests, whereas the 760M’s average includes many older DirectX and Passmark tests where it scores very low (as low as 19 in DirectX 10). This skews the comparison, so the head-to-head Geekbench results are the more reliable indicator of direct performance parity.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9060 XT LP wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark, so the use-case split is not about which GPU wins a category, but rather about the scale of the victory. For pure compute throughput, as measured by Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 9060 XT LP is in a different class entirely. Its 88,183 score places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the 760M sits at the 35th percentile. This means the RX 9060 XT LP is suited for tasks that demand heavy parallel processing, such as rendering, scientific calculations, or any workload that can leverage OpenCL’s general-purpose compute capabilities.

The 760M, by contrast, shows its strength in its modest Vulkan showing. A 30,336 Vulkan score for an IGP with a 15 W TDP is respectable, indicating it can handle modern graphics APIs reasonably well for integrated graphics. Its DirectX 11 score of 52 and DirectX 12 score of 25 from Passmark are low in absolute terms, but they confirm that the 760M is functional for basic gaming and productivity, just not at the level of a dedicated card. The RX 9060 XT LP wins the gaming and high-performance compute scenarios outright, while the 760M’s only advantage is its integration, meaning no separate card purchase is needed.

The nearest rivals for each GPU further illustrate their positioning. The 760M’s closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX 6400, with an average score of 6,001, a delta of only 0.3%. That means the 760M is essentially on par with a low-end discrete desktop card in average performance, which is a notable achievement for an integrated solution. The RX 9060 XT LP’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA CMP 30HX with an average score of 63,842, a delta of 0%, meaning they are statistically identical in average performance. This places the RX 9060 XT LP in the company of professional and mining-oriented cards, far above the 760M’s tier.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is the clear choice for anyone needing maximum graphics performance. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks, holds an 89th percentile ranking versus the 760M’s 35th, and delivers 77% more OpenCL performance. The 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 390.4 GTexel/s texture rate dwarf the 760M’s 5.323 TFLOPS and 83.17 GTexel/s, confirming that the dedicated card is built for heavy lifting.

The 760M, however, is not without its merits in the data. Its 0.3% delta against the RX 6400 shows it can match a low-end discrete GPU, and its 15 W TDP means it requires no power connectors and generates minimal heat. For a system where power efficiency and integration are priorities, and where the workload does not demand high-end compute, the 760M is a viable option. The RX 9060 XT LP’s 140 W TDP and 8-pin power connector requirement are not obstacles for a desktop with a 300 W suggested PSU, but they do preclude use in ultra-low-power builds.

The data does not support the RX 9060 XT LP for all scenarios, however. Its Vulkan score advantage of only 23.2% over the 760M suggests that in Vulkan-based games or applications, the performance gap is much smaller than the OpenCL numbers imply. This could be due to driver optimizations or architectural differences, but the recorded scores show that the 760M is more competitive in this API. For a user whose primary workload is Vulkan-based, the RX 9060 XT LP still wins, but the margin is narrow enough that the 760M’s lower power draw might be a consideration.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has an average benchmark score of 63,830, while the AMD Radeon 760M averages 6,019. The RX 9060 XT LP’s average is over 10 times higher, but it is based on only two tests.

Q: How much faster is the RX 9060 XT LP in OpenCL?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RX 9060 XT LP scores 88,183 against the 760M’s 20,255, a delta of -77%. This means the RX 9060 XT LP is approximately 4.35 times faster in this test.

Q: What is the difference in Vulkan performance?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP scores 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the 760M scores 30,336. The delta is -23.2%, so the RX 9060 XT LP is about 30% faster in this specific benchmark.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the 760M ranks in the 35th percentile.

Q: What are the shading unit counts for each GPU?

A: The 760M has 512 shading units, while the RX 9060 XT LP has 2,048 shading units. This is a 4x difference that directly contributes to the compute performance gap.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The 760M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, while the RX 9060 XT LP has a TDP of 140 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on different generations of AMD’s RDNA architecture, which explains the performance disparity. The 760M uses RDNA 3.0 with a Phoenix chip, while the RX 9060 XT LP uses RDNA 4.0 with a Navi 44 chip. Both are manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, but the RX 9060 XT LP packs more transistors: 29,700 million versus 25,390 million for the 760M. The die size also differs, with the RX 9060 XT LP at 199 mm² versus the 760M’s 178 mm², yielding a transistor density of 149.2M per mm² for the RX 9060 XT LP and 142.6M per mm² for the 760M.

The core configurations diverge sharply. The 760M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The RX 9060 XT LP has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. This 4x increase in shading units and TMUs, and a 4x increase in ROPs and RT cores, drives the higher pixel rate (195.2 GPixel/s vs 41.58 GPixel/s) and texture rate (390.4 GTexel/s vs 83.17 GTexel/s). The FP32 compute is 24.99 TFLOPS for the RX 9060 XT LP versus 5.323 TFLOPS for the 760M, a 4.7x difference.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The 760M uses system shared memory, meaning its bandwidth is dependent on the host system’s RAM. The RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 322.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory is a significant architectural advantage for the RX 9060 XT LP, as it does not compete with the CPU for memory access.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 9060 XT LP uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the 760M uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which could affect data transfer rates in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The RX 9060 XT LP also has a dedicated game clock of 2450 MHz and a boost clock of 3050 MHz, versus the 760M’s base of 800 MHz and boost of 2599 MHz.

Specification Differences

The specifications where the two GPUs do not match are extensive. The 760M is an IGP with no slot width, while the RX 9060 XT LP is a dual-slot card. The 760M has no power connectors, while the RX 9060 XT LP requires a single 8-pin connector and has a suggested PSU of 300 W. The TDP differs by 125 W: 15 W for the 760M and 140 W for the RX 9060 XT LP.

Memory is another clear differentiator. The 760M has system shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth, while the RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The clock speeds are also distinct: the 760M boosts to 2599 MHz, while the RX 9060 XT LP boosts to 3050 MHz with a game clock of 2450 MHz and a memory clock of 2518 MHz.

The bus interface differs as well: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 760M versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RX 9060 XT LP. Display outputs are not specified for the 760M as they are motherboard dependent, while the RX 9060 XT LP lists 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The release dates show the 760M launched on 2024-01-30, while the RX 9060 XT LP is scheduled for 2025-12-16. The predecessor names also differ: the 760M succeeds Navi II IGP, while the RX 9060 XT LP succeeds Navi III.