GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
535
geekbench_opencl
23,468
31,285
geekbench_vulkan
21,965
40,006
passmark_directx_10
N/A
31
passmark_directx_11
N/A
73
passmark_directx_12
N/A
32
passmark_directx_9
N/A
97
passmark_g2d
N/A
969
passmark_g3d
N/A
7,615
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
3,719

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon 880M

Throughout this graphics card battle, the AMD Radeon 880M establishes its leadership clearly. Whether you're streaming at high resolutions, the AMD Radeon 880M reliably beats GeForce AMD Radeon 680M by significant gaps. This performance gap increases especially wider at demanding detail settings. This GPU manages heavy titles with efficiency. Its architectural improvements are evident.

GeForce AMD Radeon 680M struggles to compete with the AMD Radeon 880M's pure capability. For cost-sensitive users, GeForce AMD Radeon 680M can nonetheless deliver sufficient results, however people demanding top-tier results would invest toward the AMD Radeon 880M. This performance difference is sufficiently notable to deny. Demanding games notably showcase this margin. The price gap delivers benefits in capability.

GeForce AMD Radeon 680M faces challenges to match the AMD Radeon 880M's pure power. In budget users, GeForce AMD Radeon 680M may still provide acceptable performance, though people wanting top-tier performance will look toward the AMD Radeon 880M. This frame rate margin is sufficiently notable to ignore. Intensive scenarios particularly highlight this difference. This investment pays rewards in frame rates.

For buyers facing a purchase determination, the AMD Radeon 880M emerges as the advised choice. The reliable benchmark superiority over GeForce AMD Radeon 680M renders it the wiser selection for performance-oriented builders. Evaluate your specific workloads, yet this evidence points toward the AMD Radeon 880M. Reach an informed selection. This gaming difference is measurable and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
880M
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
768 0.0%
Shaders
768
768 0.0%
TMUs
48
48 0.0%
ROPs
32
16 -50.0%
Compute Units
12
12 0.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2900 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
46.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
139.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
4.454 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
12 0.0%
Power
TDP
50 W
15 W
TDP (W)
50
15 -70.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.5
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
Strix Point
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
34,000 million
Die Size
208 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
145.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
2.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Navi II IGP
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 680M Details View Radeon 880M Details