GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 660M

CORE STATE Rembrandt
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1900 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
12,876
31,285
geekbench_vulkan
14,748
40,006
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
535
passmark_directx_10
N/A
31
passmark_directx_11
N/A
73
passmark_directx_12
N/A
32
passmark_directx_9
N/A
97
passmark_g2d
N/A
969
passmark_g3d
N/A
7,615
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
3,719

Analysis: AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon 880M

Reviewing the test figures for AMD AMD Radeon 880M and AMD's AMD Radeon 660M, a definite picture unfolds. AMD AMD Radeon 880M reliably delivers better performance in the benchmarking. The performance edge varies from noticeable to remarkable depending on the particular title. This consistency speaks to fundamental architectural advantages. Consumers prioritizing gaming throughput might take note.

Gaming benchmarks across diverse titles steadily favor AMD AMD Radeon 880M. Whether it's competitive scenarios to heavy releases, AMD AMD Radeon 880M maintains its edge. This gaming reliability in various games proves inherent technical advantages. Gamers should rely on strong frame rates regardless of game type. This versatility is notable.

The memory edge of AMD AMD Radeon 880M becomes particularly significant at increased settings. 4K gaming needs considerable graphics memory, and AMD AMD Radeon 880M has extra capacity. This translates into better gameplay in VRAM-hungry games. Modern releases might only consume extra video memory. The benefit expands over time.

When those facing a purchase choice, AMD AMD Radeon 880M emerges as the recommended option. The consistent frame rate advantage over AMD's AMD Radeon 660M makes it the smarter choice for enthusiast buyers. Weigh your personal needs, though this evidence directs toward AMD AMD Radeon 880M. Base an informed decision. This gaming difference is real and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
660M
880M
Core Specs
Shading Units
384
768 +100.0%
Shaders
384
768 +100.0%
TMUs
24
48 +100.0%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
Compute Units
6
12 +100.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
2900 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
46.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
45.60 GTexel/s
139.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1,459.2 GFLOPS
4.454 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
91.20 GFLOPS (1:16)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.918 TFLOPS (2:1)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
12 +100.0%
Power
TDP
40 W
15 W
TDP (W)
40
15 -62.5%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.5
GPU Name
Rembrandt
Strix Point
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
34,000 million
Die Size
208 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
145.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
2.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Navi II IGP
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 660M Details View Radeon 880M Details