AMD Instinct MI350P vs AMD Radeon PRO V710 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison scenario: the AMD Instinct MI350P has no benchmark entries in the database, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has two recorded benchmark scores. The MI350P's average benchmark score is 0, placing it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The Radeon PRO V710, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it at the 88th percentile. This 38-percentile gap indicates a substantial difference in measured performance across the database's test suite.

The Radeon PRO V710's two recorded benchmarks show its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it scores 116,460, which reflects substantial raw compute throughput. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 853. These two scores anchor the V710's 88th percentile ranking and its average score of 58,657.

The Instinct MI350P's absence from the benchmark database means no direct head-to-head scores exist between these two accelerators. The database records zero wins for the MI350P and zero wins for the Radeon PRO V710 in head-to-head comparisons. This absence of direct measurement data requires analysis to focus on architectural and specification differences rather than comparative benchmark outcomes.

The nearest rivals for the Radeon PRO V710 provide context for its measured performance. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, a 0.2% delta from the V710. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58,392, a 0.5% delta. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58,239, a 0.7% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58,085, a 1% delta. These narrow margins show the V710 sits at the top of a tightly clustered group, leading its nearest rival by 0.2% and its fourth-closest rival by a full 1%.

For the MI350P, the absence of benchmark scores means its 50th percentile ranking derives from its specification profile rather than measured test results. The database treats its average score as 0, which places it below all GPUs with recorded benchmarks. This does not indicate the MI350P's actual performance potential; it reflects the lack of recorded measurements in the database.

FAQ

Q: Why does the AMD Instinct MI350P have an average benchmark score of 0?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the MI350P. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile ranking of 50 reflects this absence of measured data rather than a performance result.

Q: What benchmark scores does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have?

A: The V710 has two recorded scores: 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score across these tests is 58,657.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO V710 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The V710 leads the NVIDIA P102-100 by 0.2%, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 0.5%, the Intel Arc A570M by 0.7%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 1% in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the MI350P's transistor count compared to the V710?

A: The MI350P contains 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die, while the V710 contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The MI350P has roughly 2.6 times the transistor count and roughly 3.4 times the die area.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS FP32, while the V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32. The MI350P is approximately 30% higher in this metric.

Q: Do either of these cards support display outputs?

A: No. Both the MI350P and the V710 have no display outputs recorded in their specifications.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Instinct MI350P and AMD Radeon PRO V710 use fundamentally different GPU architectures. The MI350P uses CDNA 4.0, AMD's compute-optimized architecture designed for data center acceleration. The V710 uses RDNA 3.0, AMD's graphics-oriented architecture adapted for professional workstation use. These architectural lineages explain several significant differences in their design priorities.

The manufacturing process nodes differ substantially. The MI350P uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the V710 uses a 5 nm process from the same foundry. This process advantage contributes to the MI350P's higher transistor density in absolute terms, though the V710 actually achieves higher transistor density per square millimeter at 81.2M per mm² versus the MI350P's 61.3M per mm².

The chip designs reflect their different purposes. The MI350P uses the "MI350 128CU" chip with 8,192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and no raster operations pipelines. The V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations pipelines. The V710 also includes 54 ray tracing cores, while the MI350P has none recorded.

The MI350P's CDNA architecture omits traditional graphics features entirely. Its API support shows N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The V710's RDNA architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This difference confirms the MI350P targets compute-only workloads, while the V710 retains full graphics API compatibility.

The compute throughput characteristics differ in their FP16 support. Both cards deliver FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning the MI350P's FP16 equals its FP32 at 36.04 TFLOPS, and the V710's FP16 equals its FP32 at 27.65 TFLOPS. Neither card shows tensor core counts in the database, though the MI350P's CDNA architecture typically prioritizes matrix operations.

Specification Differences

The memory subsystems show the largest specification gaps. The MI350P uses 144 GB of HBM3e memory on a 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MI350P offers roughly 5.1 times the memory capacity and roughly 16.3 times the memory bandwidth.

Clock speeds differ in their profiles. The MI350P has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz running at 8 Gbps effective. The V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz running at 18 Gbps effective. The V710's base clock is 90% higher, but the MI350P's boost clock is 10% higher.

Power requirements differ dramatically. The MI350P has a TDP of 600 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and recommends a 1000 W power supply. The V710 has a TDP of 158 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 450 W power supply. The MI350P draws roughly 3.8 times the power of the V710.

Physical dimensions and slot requirements differ. The MI350P is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The V710 is a single-slot card with no dimensions recorded. The bus interfaces also differ: the MI350P uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The MI350P's release date is recorded as May 6, 2026, while the V710's release date is October 2, 2024. The MI350P's predecessor is listed as Radeon Instinct, while the V710's predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega. Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Instinct MI350P wins decisively in compute throughput metrics. Its FP32 performance of 36.04 TFLOPS exceeds the V710's 27.65 TFLOPS by approximately 30%. Its texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s dwarfs the V710's 432.0 GTexel/s by a factor of roughly 2.6. For workloads that scale with raw compute and texture throughput, the MI350P's CDNA architecture delivers substantially higher numbers.

The MI350P also wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 144 GB HBM3e configuration with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth supports far larger datasets and faster data movement than the V710's 28 GB GDDR6 with 504.0 GB/s. For large model inference, training, or memory-bound compute tasks, this advantage is decisive. The MI350P's 8192-bit bus width versus the V710's 224-bit bus width reflects the different memory design philosophies.

The V710 wins on graphics and API compatibility. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support enable graphics workloads that the MI350P cannot handle at all. The V710's 96 raster operations pipelines and 54 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for rendering tasks. The MI350P has zero pixel rate and zero raster operations pipelines, confirming its compute-only orientation.

The V710 wins on efficiency metrics. Its 158 W TDP versus the MI350P's 600 W TDP means roughly 3.8 times lower power draw. Its single-slot form factor and 450 W recommended power supply versus the MI350P's dual-slot design and 1000 W recommended power supply make it far easier to integrate into existing systems. The V710's higher base clock of 1900 MHz versus 1000 MHz also indicates better per-clock efficiency.

The V710 has recorded benchmark data supporting its performance claims. Its 88th percentile ranking and average score of 58,657 confirm its measured capabilities. The MI350P has no recorded benchmarks, so its performance must be inferred from specifications.

The Verdict

The database's recorded information points to two different products for two different workloads. The AMD Instinct MI350P is a compute-focused accelerator built on CDNA 4.0 with a 3 nm process, 73,000 million transistors, 144 GB of HBM3e memory, and 36.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a graphics-capable professional card built on RDNA 3.0 with a 5 nm process, 28,100 million transistors, 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, and 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

For compute-intensive workloads that fit within a single accelerator, the MI350P's specification sheet indicates superior raw performance. Its 30% FP32 advantage, 5.1 times memory capacity, 16.3 times memory bandwidth, and 2.6 times texture rate position it as the stronger choice for large-scale compute tasks. The 8192-bit memory bus and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth enable data movement that the V710 cannot approach.

For graphics workloads, professional rendering, or any task requiring standard graphics APIs, the V710 is the only viable option between these two. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support, combined with 96 raster operations pipelines and 54 ray tracing cores, provide the graphics feature set the MI350P lacks entirely. The V710's measured benchmark scores confirm its functional performance in real workloads.

For power-constrained environments, the V710's 158 W TDP and 450 W recommended power supply offer integration flexibility the MI350P's 600 W TDP and 1000 W power supply requirement cannot match. The V710's single-slot design also simplifies chassis compatibility.

The MI350P's release date of May 6, 2026, places it as a newer product than the V710's October 2, 2024 release. The MI350P targets the Instinct product line's data center mission, while the V710 targets the Radeon Pro lineup's workstation mission. Users requiring compute acceleration for large datasets should select the MI350P based on its specification advantages. Users requiring graphics API support, ray tracing, or lower power consumption should select the V710 based on its measured benchmark performance and feature set.