AMD Instinct MI300X vs Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD Instinct MI300X and the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is defined by an absolute gap in compute capability rather than a set of close contests. The AMD part posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 317,994, placing it at the 100th percentile against all GPUs in the database. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average benchmark score at zero and placing it at the 50th percentile. With no head-to-head benchmark entries and zero wins recorded for either side, the numerical story is straightforward: the MI300X delivers 317,994 points of measured OpenCL performance, while the Intel part has no comparable measurement in the database.

Looking at the MI300X against its nearest rivals provides context for that score. It trails the NVIDIA H200 NVL by 5 percent, with the H200 scoring 334,891. It also trails the NVIDIA B200 by 8 percent, with that part scoring 345,482. Against the NVIDIA L40S, the MI300X leads by 7.5 percent, as the L40S scores 295,763. Against the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation, the lead expands to 10.7 percent, with that card scoring 287,237. These deltas show the MI300X sitting in a competitive band among top-tier accelerators, slightly behind the newest NVIDIA parts but ahead of the previous-generation workstation and data center offerings.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, no benchmark entries, and no percentile data beyond its median placement. This means the database contains no quantifiable performance comparison for it. The only conclusion the data supports is that the MI300X is a measured, high-performance compute accelerator, while the UHD 710 Mobile is an integrated graphics solution with no recorded compute results.

Architecture Differences

The two parts come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Instinct MI300X uses the CDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with the chip codenamed Aqua Vanjaram. It belongs to the Instinct (MIx) generation and carries 153,000 million transistors on a 1017 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 150.4 million per square millimeter. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Generation 12.2 architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with the chip based on Raptor Lake. It belongs to the HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) generation. The Intel part has no listed transistor count, die size, or transistor density in the database.

Compute resources differ by orders of magnitude. The MI300X packs 19,456 shading units, 1,216 texture mapping units, and zero ROPs. The UHD 710 Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The MI300X reports a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s and a texture rate of 2,553.6 GTexel/s. The Intel part reports 4.800 GPixel/s and 9.600 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput tells the same story: the MI300X delivers 81.72 TFLOPS, while the UHD 710 Mobile delivers 307.2 GFLOPS. In FP16, the MI300X again delivers 81.72 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part delivers 614.4 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The MI300X has no RT cores or tensor cores listed, nor does the Intel part.

Memory architecture is another major divider. The MI300X comes with 192 GB of HBM3 memory on an 8192-bit bus, providing 5.32 TB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 1300 MHz, which the database lists as 5.2 Gbps effective. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses System Shared memory, with a System Shared type, bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth. Its base clock is 300 MHz and its boost clock is 1200 MHz, while the MI300X runs at a 1000 MHz base and 2100 MHz boost.

Power and packaging differ completely. The MI300X has a TDP of 750 W, uses an OAM Module slot width, has no power connectors listed, and suggests an 1150 W power supply. It interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16 and has no display outputs. The UHD 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP, is an IGP, uses a Ring Bus interface, and has display outputs described as Portable Device Dependent. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI300X lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan support.

The release dates differ by roughly eleven months. The MI300X launched on December 5, 2023. The UHD 710 Mobile launched on January 3, 2023. The Intel part remains in active production and has a successor, Arc Graphics-M. The MI300X lists Radeon Instinct as its predecessor and has no successor listed.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear split. The AMD Instinct MI300X is a data center compute accelerator with a measured OpenCL score of 317,994, placing it at the 100th percentile. It competes directly with NVIDIA H200 NVL, B200, L40S, and RTX 6000 Ada Generation parts, and its deltas against those rivals are all within a single-digit to low-double-digit percentage range. Anyone needing large-scale compute, high FP32 throughput, 192 GB of HBM3 memory, or 5.32 TB/s of bandwidth should select the MI300X. The 750 W TDP and OAM Module form factor make it suitable only for server or accelerator chassis environments with the recommended 1150 W power supply.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with no benchmark scores in the database. It draws 15 W, uses system memory, and provides display outputs that are portable device dependent. It supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its role is basic display output and light graphics work in mobile systems, not compute acceleration. The data cannot support any performance claim for it, because no measured results exist.

The verdict is not a contest. It is a separation of roles. The MI300X is for compute workloads that demand maximum measured performance. The UHD 710 Mobile is for integrated graphics in portable devices where power draw and physical footprint matter more than compute throughput.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two parts differ, drawn directly from the database entries.

| Field | AMD Instinct MI300X | Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | Aqua Vanjaram | Raptor Lake |

| Architecture | CDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.2 |

| Generation | Instinct (MIx) | HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 153,000 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 1017 mm² | Not listed |

| Transistor Density | 150.4M / mm² | Not listed |

| Base Clock | 1000 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2100 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1300 MHz 5.2 Gbps effective | System Shared |

| Memory Size | 192 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | HBM3 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 5.32 TB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 19,456 | 128 |

| TMUs | 1,216 | 8 |

| ROPs | 0 | 4 |

| Pixel Rate | 0 MPixel/s | 4.800 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 2,553.6 GTexel/s | 9.600 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 81.72 TFLOPS | 307.2 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 81.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 614.4 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 750 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | OAM Module | IGP |

| Power Connectors | None | Not listed |

| Suggested PSU | 1150 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | N/A | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |

| Production Status | Not listed | Active |

| Release Date | 2023-12-05 | 2023-01-03 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Instinct | Not listed |

| Successor | Not listed | Arc Graphics-M |

| Geekbench OpenCL Score | 317,994 | No entries |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 100 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 317,994 | 0 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher measured benchmark score?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300X has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 317,994. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, so it has no recorded score.

Q: How does the MI300X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The MI300X is 5 percent behind the NVIDIA H200 NVL, 8 percent behind the NVIDIA B200, 7.5 percent ahead of the NVIDIA L40S, and 10.7 percent ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Q: What memory configurations do the two parts use?

A: The MI300X uses 192 GB of HBM3 memory on an 8192-bit bus with 5.32 TB/s bandwidth. The UHD 710 Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP requirements for each part?

A: The MI300X has a 750 W TDP and suggests a 1150 W power supply. The UHD 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP and lists no power supply suggestion.

Q: Which part supports display outputs?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has display outputs described as Portable Device Dependent. The AMD Instinct MI300X has no display outputs.

Q: What API support does each part provide?

A: The UHD 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI300X lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Instinct MI300X wins in every measured compute category. Its FP32 throughput of 81.72 TFLOPS dwarfs the 307.2 GFLOPS of the Intel part. Its FP16 throughput of 81.72 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio doubles the Intel part's 614.4 GFLOPS in raw output, even though the Intel part runs a 2:1 ratio. The texture rate of 2,553.6 GTexel/s versus 9.600 GTexel/s shows a 266-fold advantage. The memory bandwidth of 5.32 TB/s versus System Dependent bandwidth is not directly comparable, but the 192 GB HBM3 pool on an 8192-bit bus is clearly aimed at large-scale data movement. The MI300X also wins on process node, using 5 nm at TSMC versus 10 nm at Intel, and on transistor count, with 153,000 million transistors versus no listed count.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 15 W TDP compares to 750 W, a 50-fold reduction. It is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, meaning it requires no separate power connectors and no dedicated power supply recommendation. It provides display outputs, which the MI300X lacks entirely. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the MI300X lists N/A for all three. The UHD 710 Mobile also holds an active production status and has a successor, Arc Graphics-M, indicating ongoing product support. Its release date of January 3, 2023 predates the MI300X's December 5, 2023 launch by roughly eleven months.

The use-case split is clean. The MI300X wins for compute acceleration, high-throughput FP32 and FP16 workloads, large memory capacity, and high bandwidth tasks. The UHD 710 Mobile wins for basic graphics output, low-power mobile systems, API compatibility, and integrated operation without external power requirements. The database contains no overlapping benchmark results, so any direct performance comparison beyond the recorded MI300X score is not supported by the data.