NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
NVIDIANVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Specifications
GeForce GTX 780 Ti GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
GTX 780 Ti Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 780 Ti Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti by NVIDIA Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the GTX 780 Ti, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
GTX 780 Ti Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Kepler Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on NVIDIA's Kepler architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the GTX 780 Ti will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 780 Ti Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce GTX 780 Ti to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce GTX 780 Ti by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Benchmark Scores
geekbench_metalSource
Geekbench Metal tests GPU compute using Apple's Metal API. This shows how NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti performs in macOS and iOS applications that leverage GPU acceleration. Metal provides low-overhead access to Apple silicon GPUs.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performersgeekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
geekbench_vulkanSource
Geekbench Vulkan tests GPU compute using the modern low-overhead Vulkan API. This shows how NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti performs with next-generation graphics and compute workloads. Vulkan offers better CPU efficiency than older APIs like OpenGL.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
About NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a late-Kepler flagship built on the 28 nm GK110B chip, packing 7,080 million transistors into a 561 mm² die. Its average benchmark score of 23,338 places it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, a position that reveals a card still capable of competing with modern mid-range parts despite its 2013 roots. The data indicates a product that was a top-tier enthusiast offering at launch, but whose legacy is now defined by how well its raw compute and memory bandwidth hold up against much younger architectures.
Power and Cooling
The GTX 780 Ti carries a thermal design power of 250 W, a figure that reflects the high clock speeds and massive transistor count of the GK110B chip at 28 nm. This power draw necessitates a robust cooling solution; the reference design is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 38 mm in width, making it a substantial physical presence in any chassis. The card’s power delivery requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin PCIe power connector, a configuration that was typical for high-end cards of its generation.
For system integration, the FACT PACK specifies a suggested power supply rating of 600 W. This recommendation accounts for the card’s peak draw alongside the rest of a typical system’s components. The data does not provide efficiency ratings or transient spike behavior, but the 600 W figure suggests that a quality PSU with adequate headroom on the +12V rail is a prerequisite for stable operation. The combination of a 250 W TDP and dual connectors indicates that this is not a card for slim or low-power builds; it demands a case with good airflow and a power supply with dedicated PCIe cables. The conclusion from the power data is straightforward: the GTX 780 Ti is a power-hungry part by modern standards, but its requirements are clearly defined and manageable with the specified 600 W unit.
Memory Subsystem
The memory configuration is one of the GTX 780 Ti’s most enduring strengths. It features 3 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 384-bit bus, which yields a peak bandwidth of 336.6 GB/s. This is a high-bandwidth design that was essential for feeding the 2,880 shading units at 4K resolutions and with heavy anti-aliasing. The effective memory clock is rated at 7 Gbps, and the wide bus is the key enabler of the impressive bandwidth figure.
For high-resolution gaming, the implications are significant. The 336.6 GB/s of bandwidth allows the card to handle large texture sets and high-resolution framebuffers without becoming memory-starved, a scenario that often plagues narrower-bus cards. However, the 3 GB capacity is a limiting factor in modern titles; while the bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p in many cases, the capacity can be exceeded by games with high-detail 4K textures, leading to stuttering or reduced texture quality. The data shows a balance: the bus width and bandwidth are competitive even today, but the 3 GB size is a clear generational constraint. The 384-bit interface is a notable advantage over many contemporary cards that use 128-bit or 192-bit buses, and this is reflected in the card’s ability to maintain competitive average scores despite its age.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The GTX 780 Ti is built on the Kepler architecture, which predates dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores; the FACT PACK lists null values for both rtCores and tensorCores. This is a definitive statement: the hardware has no fixed-function units for hardware-accelerated ray tracing or AI-based upscaling. The card’s feature set is instead defined by its API support, which includes DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175.
The DirectX 12 (11_1) support is a critical detail. It means the card can run DirectX 12 titles, but only at the 11_1 feature level, which excludes many of the advanced DX12 features like variable rate shading or mesh shaders that are present in newer GPUs. This is not a card for ray-traced effects; any game that requires DXR will not run on this hardware. The Vulkan 1.2.175 support does provide access to modern low-level APIs, which can improve performance in Vulkan-based titles, but again without the benefit of RT or tensor cores. The display outputs include dual DVI, one HDMI 1.4a, and one DisplayPort 1.2, which limits high-refresh-rate 4K output to DisplayPort only. The feature set is therefore best described as a legacy configuration: it supports modern API calls but lacks the specialized hardware that defines contemporary graphics cards.
How It Compares
The GTX 780 Ti’s average score of 23,338 places it in a tight cluster with several modern competitors, with performance deltas of less than 1% in all cases.
vs. AMD Radeon RX 6600M: The GTX 780 Ti is effectively tied with the RX 6600M, holding a marginal 0.1% lead. This is a remarkable result for a desktop card from 2013 against a mobile GPU from 2021. The RX 6600M likely counters with newer features and lower power consumption, but the raw compute scores are statistically inseparable.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050: The RTX 5050 is 0.6% ahead of the GTX 780 Ti. This is a negligible difference, but it highlights the generational leap in efficiency; a modern entry-level card matches the performance of a former flagship. The RTX 5050 also brings RT and tensor cores, which the GTX 780 Ti lacks, making the comparison more one-sided when considering modern workloads.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060: The GTX 780 Ti is 0.7% ahead of the RTX 4060. This is surprising given the RTX 4060’s much newer architecture and features. The result implies that the GTX 780 Ti’s raw FP32 throughput and memory bandwidth are still competitive in pure rasterization benchmarks, even if the RTX 4060 will pull ahead in ray-traced titles and have access to DLSS.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile: The RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 0.8% ahead of the GTX 780 Ti. This is the closest rival, with a delta that is within noise margins. The laptop-oriented GPU matches the desktop Kepler card, which again underscores the GTX 780 Ti’s longevity in compute-heavy workloads.
Who Should Consider It
The benchmark data suggests that the GTX 780 Ti is a card for specific use cases rather than general-purpose modern gaming. Its 66th percentile ranking and average score of 23,338 indicate it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in many titles, but its 3 GB VRAM is a bottleneck for 1440p with high-resolution textures. For 1080p, the card remains viable, especially in older games or esports titles where its high bandwidth and 5.345 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are sufficient.
At 4K, the card is not recommended. The 3 GB frame buffer is too small for modern 4K textures, and while the 336.6 GB/s bandwidth is high, the capacity limit will cause performance drops. The card is better suited for users who play games from its own era (2013-2016) at high settings, or for those who run compute workloads that leverage its OpenCL and Vulkan performance. The Geekbench scores show strong OpenCL (27,185) and Vulkan (27,062) results, indicating the card can be repurposed for non-gaming tasks. However, the lack of RT cores and the limited DirectX 12 feature level mean it is not a future-proof purchase for new AAA titles. The data points to a card that is best considered by retro gamers or as a low-cost compute accelerator, not as a primary driver for modern high-resolution gaming.
FAQ
Q: Does the GTX 780 Ti support hardware ray tracing?
A: No. The FACT PACK lists null values for rtCores, indicating the Kepler architecture has no dedicated ray tracing hardware.
Q: What is the maximum supported DirectX version?
A: The card supports DirectX 12 (11_1), which is a limited feature level of DirectX 12, not the full 12_0 or later versions.
Q: How much VRAM does the card have and what is the bus width?
A: It has 3 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.6 GB/s.
Q: What power supply is recommended for this card?
A: The suggested PSU rating is 600 W, and the card requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.
Q: Is the GTX 780 Ti faster than an RTX 4060?
A: In the average benchmark score, the GTX 780 Ti is 0.7% ahead of the RTX 4060, but the RTX 4060 has newer features like RT cores.
Q: What is the transistor count and process node?
A: The GK110B chip contains 7,080 million transistors on a 28 nm process, with a die size of 561 mm².
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 780 Ti’s benchmark data reveals a card that punches far above its age. In Geekbench Metal, it scores 15,766, while OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 27,185 and 27,062, respectively. The average score of 23,338 is computed from these results. The nearest rival analysis shows a cluster of competitors within a 1.5% range, which is a tight grouping that suggests the GTX 780 Ti’s performance is firmly in the modern mid-range tier.
The deltaPct values are telling: the card is 0.1% faster than the RX 6600M, 0.7% faster than the RTX 4060, but 0.6% slower than the RTX 5050 and 0.8% slower than the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile. These differences are trivial in real-world terms, meaning a user would not notice the difference in everyday gaming. The interpretation is that the GTX 780 Ti’s 5.345 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 336.6 GB/s bandwidth are the primary drivers of this parity. The card’s pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.7 GTexel/s are also high, contributing to its ability to keep up with modern GPUs in rasterization-heavy tests.
However, the scores do not tell the full story. The lack of RT cores and tensor cores means that in any benchmark that includes ray tracing or DLSS, the GTX 780 Ti would fall far behind the RTX 4060 or RTX 5050. The Geekbench scores are compute-focused, which plays to the GTX 780 Ti’s strengths. The data implies that for pure compute and traditional rasterization, the card is a viable modern performer, but its feature set and VRAM capacity are hard limits for contemporary gaming workloads. The 66th percentile ranking confirms that while it is not a top-tier part, it sits above the median GPU, a remarkable achievement for a card that launched in late 2013.
The AMD Equivalent of GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Comparisons
See how the GeForce GTX 780 Ti stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare GeForce GTX 780 Ti with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs