GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2130 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

T600 Mobile

CORE STATE TU117

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1410 MHz

TDP 40 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

1,767

N/A

geekbench_opencl

78,074

35,486

geekbench_vulkan

83,360

30,211

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

138

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

216

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,072

N/A

passmark_g3d

16,927

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

7,834

N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile

Graphics performance comparisons between RTX 2000 by NVIDIA and NVIDIA T600 Mobile (NVIDIA) indicate a clear champion. RTX 2000 by NVIDIA offers significantly superior benchmark scores across modern gaming benchmarks. This video memory superiority and design improvements result into noticeably improved gaming quality. Benchmark figures supports this finding. Players looking for maximum graphics might factor this in.

In conclusion, RTX 2000 by NVIDIA represents the better choice in this analysis. Its frame rate advantages validate evaluation for anyone putting together a powerful rendering system. Though NVIDIA T600 Mobile (NVIDIA) features its merits, the benchmark numbers clearly favors RTX 2000 by NVIDIA. Reach your decision with this in mind. The performance margin is significant sufficiently to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

T600 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

2,816

896 -68.2%

Shaders

2,816

896 -68.2%

TMUs

56 -36.4%

ROPs

32 -33.3%

SM Count

14 -36.4%

Clocks

Base Clock

1620 MHz

780 MHz

Boost Clock

2130 MHz

1410 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

4,096 -75.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

12 MB

1024 KB

Performance

Pixel Rate

102.2 GPixel/s

45.12 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

187.4 GTexel/s

78.96 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

12.00 TFLOPS

2.527 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

187.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

78.96 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

12.00 TFLOPS (1:1)

5.053 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Tensor Cores

—

Power

TDP

70 W

40 W

TDP (W)

40 -42.9%

Suggested PSU

250 W

—

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

Turing

GPU Name

AD107

TU117

Generation

Workstation Ada (x000A)

Quadro Turing-M (Tx000)

Process Size

5 nm

12 nm

Transistors

18,900 million

4,700 million

Die Size

159 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

118.9M / mm²

23.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.9

7.5

Shader Model

6.9

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

IGP

Length

168 mm 6.6 inches

—

Height

69 mm 2.7 inches

—

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 3.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

649 USD

—

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Workstation Ampere

Quadro Pascal-M

Successor

Blackwell PRO W

Ampere-MW

View RTX 2000 Ada Generation Details View T600 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

T600 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons