GPU Comparison
RADEON
AMD Radeon 880M
CORE STATE
Strix Point
VRAM
System Shared
CLOCK SPEED
2900 MHz
TDP
15 W
BUS WIDTH
System Shared
ARCHITECTURE
RDNA 3.5
PROCESS
4 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2024
VS
GEFORCE
T400
CORE STATE
TU117
VRAM
2 GB
CLOCK SPEED
1425 MHz
TDP
30 W
BUS WIDTH
64 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Turing
PROCESS
12 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2021
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
geekbench_opencl
geekbench_vulkan
passmark_directx_10
passmark_directx_11
passmark_directx_12
passmark_directx_9
passmark_g2d
passmark_g3d
passmark_gpu_compute
Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA T400
In this graphics card comparison, the AMD Radeon 880M shows its advantage obviously. If you're rendering at high resolutions, the AMD Radeon 880M reliably exceeds GeForce NVIDIA T400 by notable gaps. This performance margin widens particularly larger at higher settings. The video card processes resource-hungry titles with ease. The technical advantages are clear.
For users facing a purchase selection, the AMD Radeon 880M emerges as the advised selection. The consistent performance lead over GeForce NVIDIA T400 establishes it the better investment for performance-oriented builders. Weigh your particular needs, however the benchmarks points toward the AMD Radeon 880M. Form an informed selection. This gaming delta is tangible and notable.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
880M
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
384
-50.0%
Shaders
768
384
-50.0%
TMUs
48
24
-50.0%
ROPs
16
16
0.0%
Compute Units
12
—
SM Count
—
6
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1250 MHz
10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
2,048
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
—
Power
TDP
15 W
30 W
TDP (W)
15
30
+100.0%
Suggested PSU
—
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Turing
GPU Name
Strix Point
TU117
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Quadro Turing
(Tx000)
Process Size
4 nm
12 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
4,700 million
Die Size
233 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Volta
Successor
—
Workstation Ampere