NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only one benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database, so a direct numerical comparison in any specific test cannot be established. The sole score available for the NVIDIA part is 11,088 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This places the NVIDIA card at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO also sits at the 50th percentile, but this is based on zero recorded scores, which makes the percentile a default placeholder rather than a measured result.

The nearest rivals for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q provide context for its single benchmark result. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q matches its score exactly at 11,088 points, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 550 scores 11,075 points, which is 0.1 percent behind the NVIDIA card. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 11,047 points, 0.4 percent behind. The AMD FirePro W4300 scores 11,225 points, which puts it 1.2 percent ahead of the RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q. These deltas are small, indicating that the single measured benchmark places the NVIDIA card in a tight cluster of results, though the FirePro W4300 edges ahead slightly.

Because the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals, no head-to-head benchmark wins can be assigned to either product. The wins count is zero for both sides. The database shows no overlapping test data for these two cards. Any performance comparison between them must rely on the architectural and specification differences recorded in their respective entries, not on direct measured scores.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. Its nearest rivals list is also empty. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has one recorded score of 11,088 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card's single benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q scores 11,088. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q matches this at 11,088 with a 0 percent delta. The AMD Radeon RX 550 is 0.1 percent behind at 11,075. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 0.4 percent behind at 11,047. The AMD FirePro W4300 is 1.2 percent ahead at 11,225.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q uses 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q reaches 110.1 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA card delivers substantially more single-precision throughput.

Q: What are the process nodes for these two cards?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Both use TSMC as the foundry.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes. Both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) as their DirectX API support. Both also support OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q uses the GB202 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. The NVIDIA part is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Lisuan part uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². The Lisuan chip has unknown transistor count and die size.

The NVIDIA card includes 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, 192 ROPs, 188 RT cores, and 752 tensor cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO includes 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Lisuan card has no recorded RT core or tensor core counts in the database. The NVIDIA card's pixel rate is 439.3 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 1,720.6 GTexel/s. The Lisuan card's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. FP16 compute on the NVIDIA card is 110.1 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32. The Lisuan card delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio to FP32.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The NVIDIA card uses 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus at a memory clock of 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, reaching 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus at a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, reaching 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card's memory clock is recorded as 1750 MHz, while the Lisuan card's is 2250 MHz, but the effective data rates differ in the opposite direction due to the different memory types and bus widths.

The power envelope also differs. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q has a TDP of 300 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 16-pin power connector. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16 as its bus interface, while the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b on the NVIDIA card and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a on the Lisuan card.

The Verdict

The data shows the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q as the measured performer between the two. It has a recorded benchmark score, a defined set of nearest rivals, and a full specification list. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark data, no rivals, and several unknown fields including transistor count, die size, base clock, boost clock, RT cores, and tensor cores. Any selection between these two cards must account for the fact that the Lisuan card offers no verified performance results in the database.

For users prioritizing measured performance in the database, the NVIDIA card is the only option with a score, and that score sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA card also provides substantially higher FP32 throughput, larger memory capacity, wider memory bus, and higher memory bandwidth. The Lisuan card offers a lower TDP and a newer release date in the database, but without benchmark evidence its real-world performance cannot be assessed from the recorded data.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO may be suitable for scenarios where the recorded specifications align with requirements, specifically its 24 GB GDDR6 memory, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 225 W TDP. However, the absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot verify its performance claims. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q is the defensible choice when measured results are required, given its single recorded score and complete specification profile.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

• Chip: GB202 (NVIDIA) vs. 7G105 (Lisuan)
• Architecture: Blackwell 2.0 vs. TrueGPU
• Generation: Blackwell PRO W (x000) vs. 7G100
• Process node: 5 nm vs. 6 nm
• Transistors: 92,200 million vs. unknown
• Die size: 750 mm² vs. unknown
• Transistor density: 122.9M / mm² vs. null
• Base clock: 1590 MHz vs. null
• Boost clock: 2288 MHz vs. null
• Memory clock: 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective vs. 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
• Memory size: 96 GB vs. 24 GB
• Memory type: GDDR7 vs. GDDR6
• Memory bus width: 512 bit vs. 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 1.79 TB/s vs. 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 24,064 vs. 6,144
• TMUs: 752 vs. 192
• ROPs: 192 vs. 96
• RT cores: 188 vs. null
• Tensor cores: 752 vs. null
• Pixel rate: 439.3 GPixel/s vs. 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 1,720.6 GTexel/s vs. 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 110.1 TFLOPS vs. 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 110.1 TFLOPS (1:1) vs. 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 300 W vs. 225 W
• Suggested PSU: 700 W vs. 550 W
• Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 vs. PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1b vs. 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan version: 1.4 vs. 1.3
• Length: 267 mm 10.5 inches vs. 248 mm 9.8 inches
• Height: 111 mm 4.4 inches vs. 118 mm 4.6 inches
• Width: 40 mm 1.6 inches vs. 48 mm 1.9 inches
• Release date: 2025-03-17 vs. 2026-03-16
• Predecessor: Workstation Ada vs. null
• Launch MSRP: 8,565 USD vs. null (the NVIDIA card has a stated launch MSRP; the Lisuan card has none recorded)

The fields that match include manufacturer foundry (TSMC for both), slot width (dual-slot for both), power connector (1x 16-pin for both), DirectX version (12 Ultimate 12_2 for both), OpenGL version (4.6 for both), and production status (Active for both).

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q wins on every measured and specified performance metric recorded in the database. Its FP32 compute of 110.1 TFLOPS is roughly 4.5 times the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s is more than four times the Lisuan card's 432.0 GB/s. Its 96 GB memory capacity is four times the Lisuan card's 24 GB. Its pixel rate of 439.3 GPixel/s more than doubles the Lisuan card's 192.0 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 1,720.6 GTexel/s is over four times the Lisuan card's 384.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card has 24,064 shading units against 6,144, and 752 TMUs against 192.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on power efficiency in terms of raw TDP numbers, drawing 225 W versus 300 W. It also has a smaller physical footprint in length at 248 mm versus 267 mm, though it is taller at 118 mm versus 111 mm and wider at 48 mm versus 40 mm. The Lisuan card has a newer release date in the database, 2026-03-16 versus 2025-03-17. Its memory clock runs higher at 2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz, though the effective data rate is lower due to the narrower bus and older memory type. The Lisuan card also carries a lower suggested PSU of 550 W versus 700 W.

For use cases centered on raw compute, large memory capacity, high bandwidth, and ray tracing or tensor operations, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice from the recorded data. The Lisuan card offers no benchmark verification and no RT core or tensor core counts, so its suitability for those workloads cannot be confirmed. For scenarios where lower power draw and a shorter card length are priorities, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has the recorded specification advantage, but the lack of benchmark data leaves its performance unverified.