GPU Comparison
RADEON
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
CORE STATE
Navi 31
VRAM
20 GB
CLOCK SPEED
2394 MHz
TDP
300 W
BUS WIDTH
320 bit
ARCHITECTURE
RDNA 3.0
PROCESS
5 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2022
VS
GEFORCE
RTX A6000
CORE STATE
GA102
VRAM
48 GB
CLOCK SPEED
1800 MHz
TDP
300 W
BUS WIDTH
384 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Ampere
PROCESS
8 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2020
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
geekbench_opencl
geekbench_vulkan
passmark_directx_10
passmark_directx_11
passmark_directx_12
passmark_directx_9
passmark_g2d
passmark_g3d
passmark_gpu_compute
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
This graphics card matchup between the NVIDIA RTX A6000 card from NVIDIA and the RX 7900 XT demonstrates notably competitive results. Each graphics cards alternate wins in multiple games, with not one holding a consistent edge. This performance data supports this observation. Neither GPU wins repeatedly. Users confront a genuine selection here.
All things considered, the evaluation between the NVIDIA RTX A6000 card from NVIDIA and the RX 7900 XT results in a effective tie. Benchmark gaps are small and unlikely to influence real-world sessions. Center your decision on price, ecosystem choices, and individual capability preferences. Both are excellent selections. The parity is actual.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
RX 7900 XT
RTX A6000
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,376
10,752
+100.0%
Shaders
5,376
10,752
+100.0%
TMUs
336
336
0.0%
ROPs
192
112
-41.7%
Compute Units
84
—
SM Count
—
84
Clocks
Base Clock
1387 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2394 MHz
1800 MHz
Game Clock
2025 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2025 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
20 Gbps effective
2000 MHz
16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
20 GB
48 GB
VRAM (MB)
20,480
49,152
+140.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
320 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
800.0 GB/s
768.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
L3 Cache
80 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
459.6 GPixel/s
201.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
804.4 GTexel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
51.48 TFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.609 TFLOPS (1:32)
604.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
103.0 TFLOPS (2:1)
38.71 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
84
84
0.0%
Tensor Cores
—
336
Matrix Cores
168
—
Power
TDP
300 W
300 W
TDP (W)
300
300
0.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
700 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Navi 31
GA102
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Navi III
(RX 7000)
Workstation Ampere
(Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
28,300 million
Die Size
529 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
109.1M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
276 mm
10.9 inches
267 mm
10.5 inches
Height
110 mm
4.3 inches
112 mm
4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
899 USD
4,649 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
Quadro Turing
Successor
Navi IV
Workstation Ada