GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 750

CORE STATE Rocket Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1300 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Generation 12.1
nm
PROCESS 14 nm+++
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500 Mobile

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1500 MHz
TDP 140 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
6,743
105,307
geekbench_vulkan
8,138
76,960

Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

For this graphics card comparison, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile shows its advantage obviously. Whether you're rendering at 4K, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile consistently exceeds Intel UHD Graphics 750 by considerable percentages. This benchmark margin widens especially more at higher quality levels. The video card manages resource-hungry scenarios with ease. The architectural advantages are clear.

This graphics memory benefit of NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile turns more important at demanding settings. Ultra HD gaming requires considerable video memory, and NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile provides extra capacity. The converts into smoother gameplay in demanding workloads. Next-gen software can progressively consume more graphics memory. This advantage expands over generations.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile moves considerably ahead of Intel UHD Graphics 750. The specialized accelerators manage demanding shadow computations far more smoothly. Users looking for premium visuals will strongly choose NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile. The real-time ray tracing performance is notable. Contemporary releases progressively take advantage of real-time ray tracing capabilities.

Intel UHD Graphics 750 shouldn't be dismissed completely, yet its frame rate gap versus NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile is challenging to dismiss. For price-aware users, Intel UHD Graphics 750 might yet offer a choice assuming its reduced MSRP compensates for the reduced frame rates. But, when peak visual throughput, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile remains the obvious victor. The conclusion is straightforward. Speed seekers will lean toward NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
UHD Graphics 750
RTX A4500 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
256
5,888 +2200.0%
Shaders
256
5,888 +2200.0%
TMUs
16
184 +1050.0%
ROPs
8
96 +1100.0%
SM Count
46
Execution Units
32
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
144.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
665.6 GFLOPS
17.66 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
276.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
1,331.2 GFLOPS (2:1)
17.66 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
46
Tensor Cores
184
Power
TDP
15 W
140 W
TDP (W)
15
140 +833.3%
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Ampere
GPU Name
Rocket Lake
GA104
Generation
HD Graphics (Rocket Lake)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
14 nm+++
8 nm
Transistors
17,400 million
Die Size
392 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Samsung
Density
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View UHD Graphics 750 Details View RTX A4500 Mobile Details