GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2130 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1680 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,767
N/A
geekbench_opencl
78,074
97,178
geekbench_vulkan
83,360
73,002
passmark_directx_10
82
105
passmark_directx_11
138
127
passmark_directx_12
71
66
passmark_directx_9
216
157
passmark_g2d
1,072
585
passmark_g3d
16,927
14,796
passmark_gpu_compute
7,834
6,394

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

If analyzing NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA to RTX 2000, a gaming delta gets clearly visible. NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA secures the crown in nearly all scenario we ran. This delta is substantial sufficiently to influence real-world visual results. Enthusiasts might observe smoother gameplay. The determination is clear.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA leaps even more forward of RTX 2000. Its dedicated cores execute intensive reflection computations significantly more effectively. Users seeking next-gen effects might strongly consider NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA. The real-time ray tracing capability is substantial. Next-gen games increasingly leverage RT effects.

In-game tests throughout diverse resolutions repeatedly benefit NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA. Whether it's multiplayer titles to demanding titles, NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA maintains its lead. The frame rate dependability throughout diverse scenarios demonstrates fundamental architectural benefits. Players can expect solid frame rates independent of title. The flexibility is impressive.

RTX 2000 is not ignored completely, however its gaming difference compared to NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA is difficult to deny. For price-aware users, RTX 2000 may still make a choice if its smaller asking price accounts for its lower performance. But, for peak gaming performance, NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA is the obvious choice. This determination is obvious. Performance hunters would gravitate toward NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by NVIDIA.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX A4000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,816
5,120 +81.8%
Shaders
2,816
5,120 +81.8%
TMUs
88
160 +81.8%
ROPs
48
80 +66.7%
SM Count
22
40 +81.8%
Clocks
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1140 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1680 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
8,192 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
134.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
12.00 TFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
187.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
268.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.00 TFLOPS (1:1)
17.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
22
40 +81.8%
Tensor Cores
88
160 +81.8%
Power
TDP
70 W
115 W
TDP (W)
70
115 +64.3%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA104
Generation
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
17,400 million
Die Size
159 mm²
392 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
649 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ampere
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Blackwell PRO W
Ada-MW
View RTX 2000 Ada Generation Details View RTX A4000 Mobile Details