GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2130 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106

VRAM 6 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

1,767

1,345

geekbench_opencl

78,074

67,695

geekbench_vulkan

83,360

69,089

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

138

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

216

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,072

N/A

passmark_g3d

16,927

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

7,834

N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

In this graphics card showdown, NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card establishes its dominance obviously. Whether you're streaming at high resolutions, NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card consistently beats the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 by significant amounts. The benchmark gap expands especially larger at elevated resolutions. The video card processes demanding games with efficiency. Its engineering improvements are obvious.

Overall, NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card offers the superior choice in this analysis. Its gaming advantages support examination for buyers building a demanding visual rig. Though the NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A2000 has its advantages, the score results undeniably advantages NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card. Base your selection accordingly. The benchmark delta is substantial sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

RTX A2000

Core Specs

Shading Units

2,816

3,328 +18.2%

Shaders

2,816

3,328 +18.2%

TMUs

104 +18.2%

ROPs

48 0.0%

SM Count

26 +18.2%

Clocks

Base Clock

1620 MHz

562 MHz

Boost Clock

2130 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

6 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

6,144 -62.5%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

192 bit

Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

288.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

12 MB

3 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

102.2 GPixel/s

57.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

187.4 GTexel/s

124.8 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

12.00 TFLOPS

7.987 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

187.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

12.00 TFLOPS (1:1)

7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

26 +18.2%

Tensor Cores

104 +18.2%

Power

TDP

70 W

TDP (W)

70 0.0%

Suggested PSU

250 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

Ampere

GPU Name

AD107

GA106

Generation

Workstation Ada (x000A)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

18,900 million

12,000 million

Die Size

159 mm²

276 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

118.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.9

8.6

Shader Model

6.9

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Length

168 mm 6.6 inches

167 mm 6.6 inches

Height

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

649 USD

449 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Workstation Ampere

Quadro Turing

Successor

Blackwell PRO W

Workstation Ada

View RTX 2000 Ada Generation Details View RTX A2000 Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

RTX A2000

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons