GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
67,695
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
69,089
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
1,345

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Rendering performance tests between NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics and Arc A370M show a obvious leader. NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics offers significantly superior frame rates in modern titles. This graphics memory benefit and design upgrades lead into visibly smoother gaming experiences. Benchmark results supports this conclusion. Players looking for high-end performance should pay attention.

Arc A370M faces challenges to rival NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics's raw power. For cost-sensitive builders, Arc A370M might yet offer reasonable frame rates, though users wanting premium quality should lean toward NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics. This gaming margin is notably substantial to deny. Intensive workloads especially highlight this margin. This premium provides returns in frame rates.

Arc A370M has difficulty to compete with NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics's sheer throughput. In cost-sensitive buyers, Arc A370M may nonetheless deliver adequate performance, but those wanting premium performance might gravitate toward NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics. The frame rate delta is notably considerable to deny. Demanding games specifically reveal this difference. The premium returns returns in capability.

Ultimately: NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics claims this showdown convincingly. Buyers valuing gaming power might strongly choose NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A2000 graphics over Arc A370M. The score numbers demonstrates this assessment. The titles can execute considerably more fluidly. It's a clear winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
RTX A2000
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
3,328 +225.0%
Shaders
1,024
3,328 +225.0%
TMUs
64
104 +62.5%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
SM Count
26
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
562 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
6,144 +50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
288.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
3 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
57.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
26 +225.0%
Tensor Cores
104
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
70 W
TDP (W)
35
70 +100.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA106
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
12,000 million
Die Size
157 mm²
276 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A370M Details View RTX A2000 Details