GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 20 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2394 MHz

TDP 300 W

BUS WIDTH 320 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz

TDP 95 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

5,623

N/A

geekbench_opencl

12,756

56,518

geekbench_vulkan

71,068

53,146

passmark_directx_10

158

passmark_directx_11

340

passmark_directx_12

110

passmark_directx_9

322

115

passmark_g2d

1,232

491

passmark_g3d

29,009

9,611

passmark_gpu_compute

16,828

4,334

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

When analyzing the RX 7900 XT versus NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA, a benchmark margin gets quickly noticeable. the RX 7900 XT secures the top spot in virtually all scenario we conducted. The gap is considerable enough to change practical rendering performance. Users will feel enhanced frame rates. This verdict is clear.

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA cannot be overlooked entirely, but its benchmark gap versus the RX 7900 XT is challenging to dismiss. In price-aware builders, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile from NVIDIA can nonetheless represent sense provided its lower price accounts for the lesser capabilities. But, for maximum visual throughput, the RX 7900 XT represents the definite winner. The assessment is evident. Power seekers might shift toward the RX 7900 XT.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 7900 XT

RTX A2000 Mobile

Core Specs

Shading Units

5,376

2,560 -52.4%

Shaders

5,376

2,560 -52.4%

TMUs

336

80 -76.2%

ROPs

192

48 -75.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1387 MHz

1215 MHz

Boost Clock

2394 MHz

1687 MHz

Game Clock

2025 MHz

—

Shader Clock

2025 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2500 MHz 20 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

20 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

20,480

4,096 -80.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

320 bit

128 bit

Bandwidth

800.0 GB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

6 MB

2 MB

L3 Cache

80 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

459.6 GPixel/s

80.98 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

804.4 GTexel/s

135.0 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

51.48 TFLOPS

8.637 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1.609 TFLOPS (1:32)

135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

103.0 TFLOPS (2:1)

8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

20 -76.2%

Tensor Cores

—

Matrix Cores

168

—

Power

TDP

300 W

95 W

TDP (W)

300

95 -68.3%

Suggested PSU

700 W

—

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

None

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Navi 31

GA107

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Navi III (RX 7000)

Ampere-MW (Ax000)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

8,700 million

Die Size

529 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

109.1M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

IGP

Length

276 mm 10.9 inches

—

Height

110 mm 4.3 inches

—

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C

Portable Device Dependent

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

899 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II

Quadro Turing-M

Successor

Navi IV

Ada-MW

View Radeon RX 7900 XT Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

RTX A2000 Mobile

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons