GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1687 MHz
TDP 95 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
N/A
geekbench_opencl
20,255
56,518
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
53,146
passmark_directx_10
19
57
passmark_directx_11
52
68
passmark_directx_12
25
47
passmark_directx_9
65
115
passmark_g2d
890
491
passmark_g3d
5,310
9,611
passmark_gpu_compute
2,840
4,334

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Throughout this graphics card showdown, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile establishes its leadership clearly. If you're gaming at 4K, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile reliably surpasses GeForce AMD Radeon 760M by substantial margins. The frame rate margin increases notably more at elevated resolutions. The card handles demanding scenarios with efficiency. Its technical advantages are clear.

When it comes to RT, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile jumps even more beyond of GeForce AMD Radeon 760M. Its dedicated cores manage heavy global illumination computations more capably. Users demanding premium visuals would certainly favor the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. This real-time ray tracing capability is significant. Next-gen releases increasingly use ray tracing capabilities.

For RT, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile moves considerably ahead of GeForce AMD Radeon 760M. Its RT accelerators handle complex global illumination rendering more smoothly. Players demanding next-gen fidelity might strongly pick the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. This ray tracing advantage is considerable. Modern games increasingly use RT features.

When users considering a buying decision, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile comes out as the recommended pick. Its consistent gaming lead over GeForce AMD Radeon 760M establishes it the wiser selection for performance-oriented consumers. Factor in your personal workloads, yet this evidence points toward the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile. Base an educated determination. This gaming delta is measurable and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
RTX A2000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
2,560 +400.0%
Shaders
512
2,560 +400.0%
TMUs
32
80 +150.0%
ROPs
16
48 +200.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
20
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
1687 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
80.98 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
135.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)
8.637 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
20 +150.0%
Tensor Cores
80
Power
TDP
15 W
95 W
TDP (W)
15
95 +533.3%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Phoenix
GA107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
8,700 million
Die Size
178 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
142.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View Radeon 760M Details View RTX A2000 Mobile Details