GPU Comparison

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2130 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz

TDP 50 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

1,767

969

geekbench_opencl

78,074

52,078

geekbench_vulkan

83,360

49,574

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

138

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

216

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,072

N/A

passmark_g3d

16,927

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

7,834

N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

Analyzing the test numbers for RTX 2000 by NVIDIA and NVIDIA RTX A1000 from NVIDIA, an obvious story unfolds. RTX 2000 by NVIDIA steadily provides superior frame rates in the benchmarking. This speed edge extends from substantial to outstanding relative to the specific benchmark. Such reliability attests to core technical improvements. Buyers seeking gaming performance might pay attention.

This VRAM edge of RTX 2000 by NVIDIA becomes more critical at demanding settings. Ultra HD scenarios demands substantial video memory, and RTX 2000 by NVIDIA offers extra capacity. This translates into better gameplay in memory-intensive workloads. Next-gen games should only consume extra memory. This advantage grows over time.

Ultimately: RTX 2000 by NVIDIA takes this battle convincingly. Users wanting graphics power would definitely consider RTX 2000 by NVIDIA over NVIDIA RTX A1000 from NVIDIA. This test numbers confirms this assessment. The scenarios might execute noticeably more fluidly. This is a definite choice in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

RTX A1000

Core Specs

Shading Units

2,816

2,304 -18.2%

Shaders

2,816

2,304 -18.2%

TMUs

72 -18.2%

ROPs

32 -33.3%

SM Count

18 -18.2%

Clocks

Base Clock

1620 MHz

727 MHz

Boost Clock

2130 MHz

1462 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

8,192 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

192.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

12 MB

2 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

102.2 GPixel/s

46.78 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

187.4 GTexel/s

105.3 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

12.00 TFLOPS

6.737 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

187.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

12.00 TFLOPS (1:1)

6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

18 -18.2%

Tensor Cores

72 -18.2%

Power

TDP

70 W

50 W

TDP (W)

50 -28.6%

Suggested PSU

250 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

Ampere

GPU Name

AD107

GA107

Generation

Workstation Ada (x000A)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

5 nm

8 nm

Transistors

18,900 million

8,700 million

Die Size

159 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

118.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

8.9

8.6

Shader Model

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Single-slot

Length

168 mm 6.6 inches

163 mm 6.4 inches

Height

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Launch Price

649 USD

—

Production

Active

Predecessor

Workstation Ampere

Quadro Turing

Successor

Blackwell PRO W

Workstation Ada

View RTX 2000 Ada Generation Details View RTX A1000 Details

GPU Comparison

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

RTX A1000

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons