GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2130 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1140 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,767
N/A
geekbench_opencl
78,074
48,703
geekbench_vulkan
83,360
46,782
passmark_directx_10
82
N/A
passmark_directx_11
138
N/A
passmark_directx_12
71
N/A
passmark_directx_9
216
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,072
N/A
passmark_g3d
16,927
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
7,834
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

Gaming performance tests between NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card and NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile graphics indicate a definite leader. NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card provides considerably higher frame rates over modern games. The video memory advantage and technical advances translate into clearly enhanced gameplay results. Benchmark numbers validates this finding. Gamers seeking maximum performance might factor this in.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile graphics encounters issues to compete with NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card's sheer performance. For value-focused builders, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile graphics might still deliver reasonable results, though those seeking maximum experience should gravitate toward NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card. This performance margin is too large to dismiss. Intensive scenarios particularly highlight this gap. This premium provides dividends in frame rates.

NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile graphics cannot be dismissed entirely, however the benchmark deficit compared to NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card is challenging to ignore. For price-aware builders, NVIDIA's NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile graphics may yet make a choice when its smaller cost compensates for its reduced performance. Nevertheless, when peak rendering power, NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card represents the clear champion. The assessment is straightforward. Performance hunters might shift toward NVIDIA RTX 2000 graphics card.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX A1000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,816
2,048 -27.3%
Shaders
2,816
2,048 -27.3%
TMUs
88
64 -27.3%
ROPs
48
32 -33.3%
SM Count
22
16 -27.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
1620 MHz
630 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1140 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1375 MHz 11 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
176.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
12 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
36.48 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
72.96 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
12.00 TFLOPS
4.669 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
187.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
72.96 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.00 TFLOPS (1:1)
4.669 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
22
16 -27.3%
Tensor Cores
88
64 -27.3%
Power
TDP
70 W
60 W
TDP (W)
70
60 -14.3%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ampere
GPU Name
AD107
GA107
Generation
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
18,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
159 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
118.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.6
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
649 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ampere
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Blackwell PRO W
Ada-MW
View RTX 2000 Ada Generation Details View RTX A1000 Mobile Details