NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA RTX 6000D and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The RTX 6000D has two documented benchmark scores, while the LX PRO has none. This absence of overlapping test results means a direct score-for-score comparison is not possible from the database.

What the data does show is a stark contrast in measured performance. The RTX 6000D scores 3,522 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 388,405 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 195,964. The LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no completed benchmark runs are present in the database.

The RTX 6000D sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, placing it in the top 2% of recorded hardware. The LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile, which in the database's ranking system represents the median position, though this percentile is based on zero recorded scores and therefore reflects an unmeasured status rather than a measured performance level.

Without head-to-head results, the nearest-rival data for the RTX 6000D provides the only comparative context available. The RTX 6000D's average score of 195,964 is 0.8% higher than the NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB's 194,415, 4.7% higher than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB's 187,147, and 6.1% higher than the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 184,664. Against the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB, the RTX 6000D trails by 5.4%, with that card scoring 207,124.

These deltas are modest, ranging from a 0.8% lead over the Tesla V100S to a 5.4% deficit against the A100 PCIe 80 GB. The RTX 6000D thus occupies a competitive position within its nearest-rival cluster, though it is not the outright leader of that group. The LX PRO has no nearest rivals listed, so no similar positioning can be established for it.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 6000D wins in every measurable category where data exists. Its FP32 compute of 97.04 TFLOPS is nearly four times the LX PRO's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output is 97.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the RTX 6000D maintains its lead even in half-precision workloads.

Memory capacity favors the RTX 6000D decisively: 84 GB of GDDR7 versus 24 GB of GDDR6. Bandwidth follows the same pattern, with the RTX 6000D reaching 1.40 TB/s over a 448-bit bus, compared to 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus for the LX PRO. That is a 3.2x advantage in raw memory throughput.

Rasterization throughput also favors the RTX 6000D. Its pixel rate is 466.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. The RTX 6000D has 19,968 shading units, 624 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs.

The RTX 6000D includes 156 RT cores and 624 tensor cores. The LX PRO lists no RT core or tensor core count in the database, indicating either their absence or a lack of recorded specification. The RTX 6000D also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 but only Vulkan 1.3.

The LX PRO does hold advantages in specific areas. Its FP16 performance is exactly double its FP32 performance, suggesting a different compute architecture optimized for half-precision workloads. Its power draw is 225 W versus 600 W for the RTX 6000D, and its suggested PSU is 550 W versus 1000 W. Its physical dimensions are smaller: 248 mm in length versus 304 mm, 118 mm in height versus 137 mm, though it is thicker at 48 mm versus 40 mm.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 6000D has an average benchmark score of 195,964, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 6000D compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 6000D is 0.8% ahead of the Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, 4.7% ahead of the A100 SXM4 40 GB, 6.1% ahead of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, and 5.4% behind the A100 PCIe 80 GB.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The RTX 6000D has 84 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 448-bit bus with 1.40 TB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 6000D has 19,968 shading units, compared to 6,144 for the LX PRO.

Q: What is the FP32 compute performance of each?

A: The RTX 6000D delivers 97.04 TFLOPS FP32. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: Do both cards support Ray Tracing and Tensor cores?

A: The RTX 6000D has 156 RT cores and 624 tensor cores. The LX PRO has no RT core or tensor core count listed in the database.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. Memory size differs: 84 GB versus 24 GB. Memory type differs: GDDR7 versus GDDR6. Bus width differs: 448 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth differs: 1.40 TB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Clock speeds show a similar split. The RTX 6000D has a base clock of 1992 MHz and a boost clock of 2430 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clock. The memory clock is 1560 MHz with 25 Gbps effective for the RTX 6000D, versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the LX PRO.

Compute resources differ substantially. Shading units: 19,968 versus 6,144. TMUs: 624 versus 192. ROPs: 192 versus 96. RT cores: 156 versus none listed. Tensor cores: 624 versus none listed.

Rates also differ. Pixel rate: 466.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 1,516.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 97.04 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 97.04 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power specifications differ. TDP: 600 W versus 225 W. Suggested PSU: 1000 W versus 550 W. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and are dual-slot cards.

Bus interface differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 6000D, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX PRO. Display outputs differ: 4x DisplayPort 2.1b versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Physical dimensions differ. Length: 304 mm (12 inches) versus 248 mm (9.8 inches). Height: 137 mm (5.4 inches) versus 118 mm (4.6 inches). Width: 40 mm (1.6 inches) versus 48 mm (1.9 inches).

The RTX 6000D has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD. The LX PRO has no launch MSRP recorded. Release dates differ: the RTX 6000D was released on July 13, 2025, and the LX PRO on March 16, 2026.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 6000D uses the GB202 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm².

The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, and no transistor density is recorded.

The RTX 6000D's predecessor is listed as Workstation Ada, while the LX PRO has no predecessor recorded. Neither card has a successor listed in the database.

The RTX 6000D supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The FP16 ratio differs between the two architectures. The RTX 6000D runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning no dedicated half-precision acceleration. The LX PRO runs FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, doubling its throughput in half-precision workloads. This indicates a different compute design philosophy: the RTX 6000D prioritizes uniform FP32 throughput, while the LX PRO allocates additional hardware for FP16 operations.

The RTX 6000D includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, features absent from the LX PRO's recorded specifications. This suggests architectural support for ray tracing and AI acceleration on the RTX 6000D that the LX PRO either lacks or does not document.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of use cases. The RTX 6000D is the higher-performance card in every recorded benchmark and nearly every specification category. Its 98th percentile ranking among all GPUs, its 3,522 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and its 388,405 score in Geekbench OpenCL establish it as a top-tier compute and graphics device. Its average benchmark score of 195,964 places it within 5.4% of the NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB, a card with a higher average score of 207,124.

The LX PRO presents a different profile. With no recorded benchmarks, its 50th percentile ranking is provisional. Its specifications indicate a lower-power, smaller-footprint card with 225 W TDP, 24 GB GDDR6 memory, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio suggests a design tuned for half-precision workloads, which could serve specific compute tasks despite the overall lower throughput.

For users requiring maximum compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth, the RTX 6000D is the only option with measured results. Its 84 GB memory capacity, 1.40 TB/s bandwidth, and 97.04 TFLOPS FP32 are the highest recorded figures in this comparison. Its 156 RT cores and 624 tensor cores add capabilities the LX PRO does not document.

For users prioritizing lower power draw, smaller physical size, and half-precision compute efficiency, the LX PRO offers a more compact alternative. Its 225 W power draw is 375 W lower than the RTX 6000D's 600 W, and its 248 mm length is 56 mm shorter. Its FP16 output at double its FP32 rate indicates a specialized compute orientation.

The absence of direct benchmark comparisons and the LX PRO's zero recorded scores mean the database cannot confirm the LX PRO's real-world performance. The RTX 6000D's measured results and nearest-rival positioning provide concrete reference points. The LX PRO's specifications suggest it occupies a different market segment, but its actual performance remains unverified in the recorded data.