GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 20 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,522
3,196
geekbench_opencl
388,405
141,837
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
129,980

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

The graphics card matchup between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A4500 and Radeon RTX 6000 indicates notably competitive benchmark scores. Both GPUs exchange victories across diverse benchmarks, with no securing a decisive advantage. The benchmark numbers demonstrates this observation. No graphics card leads repeatedly. Buyers encounter a genuine decision between them.

Over fixating on slight performance improvements, interested builders can consider other elements. thermal performance, cooling, design, and support terms typically count larger than minor FPS gaps. These factors might affect the scales. Consider past simply frame rates. The entire offering matters.

When frame rates is remarkably close, cost and functionality become the primary considerations. Consider RT performance quality, DLSS/FSR implementation, TDP, and platform stability when choosing between Radeon NVIDIA RTX A4500 and Radeon RTX 6000. The considerations might affect the scales. Consider holistically. The larger picture plays a role.

Ultimately: Radeon NVIDIA RTX A4500 and Radeon RTX 6000 are similarly comparable. Not one earns a obvious nod over the rival. Allow price and software preferences guide your ultimate decision. The two cards should fulfill you adequately. It's a win-win situation.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 6000D
RTX A4500
Core Specs
Shading Units
19,968
7,168 -64.1%
Shaders
19,968
7,168 -64.1%
TMUs
624
224 -64.1%
ROPs
192
96 -50.0%
SM Count
156
56 -64.1%
Clocks
Base Clock
1590 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
84 GB
20 GB
VRAM (MB)
86,016
20,480 -76.2%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
448 bit
320 bit
Bandwidth
1.57 TB/s
640.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
128 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
466.6 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,516.3 GTexel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
369.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
23.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
156
56 -64.1%
Tensor Cores
624
224 -64.1%
Power
TDP
600 W
200 W
TDP (W)
600
200 -66.7%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
GB202
GA102
Generation
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
92,200 million
28,300 million
Die Size
750 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
122.9M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ada
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View RTX 6000D Details View RTX A4500 Details